Page 16 - TD-3-4
P. 16

Tumor Discovery                                                        Expert consensus of NUT carcinoma



            and hemorrhage  (13.25%, 11/83), resulting  from local   patterns accompanied by extensive necrosis. Regarding
            tumor compression and invasion of surrounding tissues.  specific differentiation, 25% of cases demonstrated
                                                               neuroendocrine  differentiation,  15%  exhibited
            3.2. Tumor characteristics                         myoepithelial features, and 60% showed no specific

            Tumor diameter: The average tumor diameter of NUT   differentiation. Many cases presented with numerous
            carcinoma patients was 6.04 cm. The average diameter in   mitotic figures and were often associated with geographic
            thoracic NUT carcinoma (6.86 cm) was larger than that of   necrosis. The stromal component varies from minimal to
            head-and-neck NUT carcinoma (4.08 cm).             fibrotic, with occasional infiltration of inflammatory cells.
                                                               The most prevalent IHC findings for NUT carcinoma
            3.2.1. NUT carcinoma fusion partners               included tumor protein p63  (43.84%, 153/349),
            Among   patients  with  known  specific  NUTM1     cytokeratin AE1/AE3 (26.65%, 93/349), ribonucleic acid-
            fusion partners, bromodomain-containing protein 4   binding protein p40  (24.36%, 85/349), and cytokeratin
            (BRD4)::NUTM1 was the most common (56.4%, 167/296),   5/6 (CK5/6; 22.92%, 80/349). The average Ki-67 index
            followed by nuclear receptor binding SET domain protein   expression was approximately 55.16% (15 – 95%).
            3  (NSD3)::NUTM1  (9.80%, 29/296), and  bromodomain-
            containing protein 3 (BRD3)::NUTM1 (6.76%, 20/296).  3.3. Treatment strategy
                                                               We identified 17 primary treatment modalities for current
            3.2.2. NUT carcinoma metastasis                    NUT carcinoma patients based on the patient’s previous
            A total of 29 metastatic sites were identified. About 52.28%   treatment histories. NUT carcinoma is generally insensitive
            (275/526) of all patients had distant metastasis. Among   to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. 1,18,28  Evidence suggests
            thoracic NUT carcinoma patients, 60.25% (144/239) had   that  surgery,  BET  inhibitors,  HDAC  inhibitors,  and
            distant metastasis, while 40.85% (67/164) of head-and-  immunotherapy  may  be  potentially  effective  against
            neck NUT carcinoma patients had distant metastasis.   NUT carcinoma. 1,18,28  However, the sample sizes for BET
            These findings suggest that thoracic NUT carcinoma may   inhibitors, HDAC inhibitors, and immunotherapy are
            be more prone to distant metastasis than head-and-neck   generally limited. When combined with chemotherapy
            NUT  carcinoma.  Based  on  the  available  data,  the  bones   and radiotherapy, the sample size for each group was
            were the most common site of distant metastasis (37.09%,   insufficient  (<10  patients).  Therefore,  we  grouped
            102/275). The likelihood of bone metastasis in thoracic   patients who received surgery, BET inhibitors, HDAC
            NUT carcinoma patients (48.61%, 70/144) was higher   inhibitors,  and immunotherapy  into a  category  labeled
            than in head-and-neck NUT carcinoma patients (35.82%,   “include surgery/BET/immunotherapy.” For example,
            24/67). In addition, NUT carcinoma, found in both   patients treated with BET inhibitors in combination with
            thoracic and head/neck regions, was prone to metastasize   chemotherapy or radiotherapy were collectively assigned
            to the liver (13.45%, 37/275).                     to the “include BET” group.

            3.2.3. NUT carcinoma histopathology and            3.3.1. Current treatment modalities
            immunohistochemistry                               Approximately 59.32% (312/526) of patients have relatively
            Based on our comprehensive analysis of the available   comprehensive treatment data. Among the various
            literature,  the  histopathology  of  NUT  carcinoma   therapeutic approaches, patients received chemotherapy
            predominantly  demonstrates  poor  differentiation  (18.59%,  58/312),  chemotherapy  combined  with
            (81.90%) and undifferentiation (3.02%). Notably, 72   radiotherapy (11.54%, 36/312), chemotherapy combined
            studies reported partial or focal squamous differentiation,   with surgery and radiotherapy (9.94%, 31/312), and
            while 32 studies indicated the absence of squamous   surgery combined with immunotherapy (9.62%, 30/312).
            differentiation. The remaining studies did not specifically   In thoracic NUT carcinoma patients, chemotherapy
            address this  aspect. Among  the literature  reporting   (28.28%, 41/145) and chemotherapy combined with
            tumor cell morphology of NUT carcinoma, tumor cells   radiotherapy (14.48%,  21/145)  were  the  most  common
            primarily  present  with  three  morphological  patterns:   approaches, with 10.34% (30/312) of patients receiving
            round cell morphology (approximately 40%), spindle   chemotherapy combined with surgery. Conversely, head-
            cell features (30%), and epithelioid characteristics   and-neck  NUT  carcinoma  patients  more  commonly
            (30%). The cells typically exhibit monomorphic growth   received treatment plans based on surgery, including
            patterns characterized by vesicular nuclei, prominent   chemotherapy/radiotherapy/surgery (20.34%, 24/118),
            nucleoli, and varying amounts of cytoplasm. Microscopic   radiotherapy/surgery (19.49%, 23/118), and surgery
            examination frequently reveals sheet-like growth   combined with immunotherapy (16.95%, 20/118).


            Volume 3 Issue 4 (2024)                         8                                 doi: 10.36922/td.4904
   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21