Page 20 - manuscript_ijb05583
P. 20

intensity, the peak intensity value is validated. Depending on whether it’s below or above a

               threshold, the event gets flagged for sorting (green flag) or discarded (red flag).


               The values for classifying microscaffolds as either intact or debris were derived from Figure 5
               c, whereas the minimum distance between microscaffolds was calculated as the sum of events

               within the sorting cascade without the time required to move the microscope stage between the
               wells. For a liquid pressure of 20 mbar, this time was determined to be 900 ms, therefore a time

               threshold of 1 s between events was chosen.

               Once  microscaffolds  were  flagged  sortable  (green),  a  sorting  sequence  was  started.  This

               sequence  consisted  of  an  initial  waiting  period  that  would  allow  the  BB  to  arrive  at  the

               bifurcation (values chosen from Figure 4 l). Just before actuating the valve, the flag of the BB
               event was checked one last time. This double-flagging system was introduced to abort sorting

               events in the last moment, due to a subsequent BB following too closely. This double-flagging
               greatly  reduced  the  amount  of  microscaffolds  stuck  in  the  PDMS  valve.  After  a  BB  was

               secluded in the ejection channel, it was dispensed into a cell culture well plate beneath using

               pressurized  air.  Repeatable  droplet  ejection  was  possible  at  60  mbar  for  500  ms.  Shorter
               ejection times did not fully clear the channel, whereas higher pressures resulted in sideways

               spraying of the droplet.

               The sorting efficiency of the system was determined as percentage of wells containing exactly

               one microscaffold  and amounted to  95%,  measured on  a total  of 250 microscaffolds.  The

               system’s capability to effectively distinguish between intact microscaffolds and debris was
               assessed by sorting a mixed sample containing intact BBs and buckyball halves simulating

               debris. Next, a sample size of 96 sorting events emulating the production of a fully loaded 96-
               well microtiter plate was analyzed with only intact microscaffolds being dispensed, leading to

               100% sorting efficiency. Once the sorting efficiency was determined for 96-well plates, 384-
               well plates and 1536-well plates were sorted to increase the amount of sorted microscaffolds

               while keeping the same plate form factor (Figure 7 a). The process from event detection to

               scaffold  ejection  and moving  to  the next  microwell took  approx.  2.5 s. Depending  on the
               microscaffold concentration in the reservoir, sorting a full 96-well plate typically took between

               12 and 15 minutes, whereas 384-well plates required between 50 – 60 minutes. Microscaffold
               reservoirs were loaded at 400 BB per 50 mL of liquid. An even distribution of the BBs in the

               reservoir was crucial to keep the concentration stable. This was especially important when






                                                           19
   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25