Page 72 - AC-2-2
P. 72

Arts & Communication                                                      Japanese children’s musical flow



            spontaneously attempted to produce a sound by holding   infant, in her mother’s arms, tilted her head toward the
            the bow without placing the violin on her shoulder. She   source of the sound. Many children produced resonant
            held the bow in her right hand and placed the bow on the   metal sounds, occasionally raising the metal pieces high
            strings of the violin that was lying on the floor. Since the   and looking around while gesturing for others to observe.
            sound was scratchy, her mother held the bow and guided   Caregivers also attempted this after their children made
            her to the best position. The girl began moving the bow   sounds, enjoying the experience and listening to some
            back  and  forth  vigorously,  eventually  producing  a  nice   explanations provided by specialists and researchers on
            tone. For another example, a 5-year-old boy sat in front of   metallic materials. One mother compared several sounds
            a low table where researchers had prepared various-sized   and told her child, “It’s completely different,” and shared
            violins for children. The boy’s mother and grandmother   the observation with the researcher.
            attempted to select the best instrument size for him. They   In this section, a variety of flows were observed across
            carried many different-sized violins and tried placing them   children of all ages. For instance, a 3-year-old girl excitedly
            on his shoulder to assess which size fit him best. They   held a chopstick in her right hand while her mother provided
            repeated the action several times while the boy was looking   the  metal  materials.  She  repeatedly  struck  the  material,
            at another booth, which was a technology device producing   occasionally varying her speed, and continued playing for
            a rhythmical drum sound similar to a DJ. The caregivers   over 5 min. Another 5-year-old boy deliberately selected
            found a violin that fit the boy well and positioned it on his   materials and listened closely to the differences in sound by
            shoulder, guiding him to hold the bow in his right hand and   placing each material close to his ears. He remained focused
            move it. Although he managed to produce some sound, it   for 10 min, exploring the subtle differences in the sound.
            was scratchy. Meanwhile, the grandmother started playing   Similarly, a 7-year-old boy seated next to his mother engaged
            the violin and practicing, but the boy was always looking   in a similar manner to the 5-year-old boy. In his case, his
            at other booths. They eventually left the violin booth after   mother also enjoyed exploring the sound, and eventually,
            approximately 5  min. In another instance, a 9-year-old   he asked her to hold several materials as he played them
            boy who is a 3  grader successfully produced sound on   together, resembling wind chimes. Caregivers’ intervention
                        rd
            the violin. He sought guidance from his parents on how   was minimal; they mostly observed the children, or they
            to hold the violin, and they demonstrated by imitating a   also enjoyed the activity instead of supervising the children.
            violinist. He held the violin and produced some sound.   Table 2 indicates the most observable flow indicators in
            However, when his mother instructed him to place his   each category.
            fingers on the violin strings to change the pitch, the sound   Notice that although the result indicated that the
            became scratchy compared to when he played the open   children’s flow was stifled by the technology and the violin
            strings without fingers. He then left the booth and moved   sessions and facilitated mostly by the metallic materials,
            to another one.                                    we shall not generalize the result based on these findings.

            3.3. Metallic musical materials                    Rather, the result may imply the caregiver’s stance toward
                                                               each instrument, affecting whether it stifles or facilitates
            Self-assignment was clearly evident, as many children   the children’s flow. By contrasting the violin and metallic
            carried the materials and experimented with the sounds.   materials, it was noticeable that caregivers’ attention to
            Self-correction was observed as children adjusted their   teaching their children how to play the violin or even
            grip  on  the strings  or chopsticks.  The  subtle movement   how to make a sound on the violin was with a very strong
            resulted in varied timbres, and children listened attentively   intention,  while  both  caregivers  and children  shared
            to the different sounds produced by metallic materials.   the activity on the metallic materials; thus, children’s
            The gesture was particularly notable in this activity, with
            children carefully placing the chopsticks and striking   Table 2. Observable flow experience during the workshop
            them  lightly to  achieve  the  desired  ringing  tones.  Some
            anticipation was observed as children began touching   Flow indicators  Technology  Violin  Materials
            the materials before the session started. Expansion was   Self-assignment  ○    ∆         ○
            frequently observed. For example, a 5-year-old boy joyfully   Self-correction  ∆  ∆       ∆
            played with metal pieces in sync with the music playing   Gesture  ×            ∆         ○
            from the MIDI instruments. Extension was also evident,   Anticipation  ×        ×         ○
            as children stayed much longer than expected. Awareness   Expansion  ∆          ∆         ○
            of others was clearly observed, most often when other
            children were trying several different metallic musical   Extension  ×          ∆         ○
            materials one by one with the other participants. Even an   Others  ∆           ○         ∆


            Volume 2 Issue 2 (2024)                         5                                doi: 10.36922/ac.1782
   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77