Page 88 - AIH-1-4
P. 88

Artificial Intelligence in Health                                 Robotics and Vivaldi AI for ALS assessment



            and efficacy of using robotic devices for administering the   Funding
            ALSFRS-R questionnaire and tracking disease progression
            over time. In addition, it can be assumed that high levels   This research received no specific grant from any funding
            (not clinically significant) of anxiety were initially due   agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
            to the novelty and curiosity of the first experience that   Conflict of interest
            triggered a momentary state of activation and tension but
            decreased subsequently because they became familiar with   The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
            the experience. Specifically, before the robot-administered
            questionnaire, 60.71%  of  ALS patients  exhibited no   Author contributions
            clinical state  anxiety,  while  39.29% reported  mildly   Conceptualization: J.L. Casiraghi, A. Lizio, F. Cerri
            elevated anxiety levels. In post-robotic administration,   Investigation: S. Bolognini, A. Lizio, J.L. Casiraghi, D.
            17.86% experienced a reduction in anxiety levels below   Tessaro, M. Xia, G. Sommavilla, M. Cestari, E. Carraro,
            the clinical threshold. Furthermore, in the longitudinal   F. Gerardi, V.A. Sansone, F. Cerri
            study involving 16 patients who underwent psychological   Methodology: J.L. Casiraghi, A. Lizio
            evaluations at both baseline and follow-up, no significant   Formal analysis: S. Bolognini, A. Lizio, F. Cerri, R. Pugliese
            differences in state anxiety were observed before and after   Writing–original draft: J. Casiraghi, F. Cerri, S. Bolognini,
            robotic administration at either time point. However, there   A. Lizio, V.A. Sansone, R. Pugliese
            was a more pronounced trend of anxiety reduction during   Writing–review & editing: R. Pugliese, S. Regondi, F. Cerri
            the initial evaluation (effect size = 0.42) compared to the
            final assessment (effect size = 0.36).             Ethics approval and consent to participate
              However, further research is needed to validate these   Before participation, all patients provided informed
            findings and explore the long-term impact of robotic   consent, which was approved by the Local  Ethics
            technology on patient outcomes in ALS management; using   Committee (Protocol Number: 404-092019).
            a larger sample size would provide greater statistical power
            and enhance the generalizability of the findings. Despite   Consent for publication
            this, ongoing advancements in robotics and AI technology   All patients provided written informed consent, which
            present exciting opportunities for further innovation in   was approved by the Local Ethics Committee (Protocol
            ALS care. Research efforts should focus on refining robotic   Number: 404-092019).
            systems to address specific needs and challenges faced
            by ALS patients, such as respiratory support, mobility   Availability of data
            assistance, and communication aids. Collaborative   Data are available from the corresponding author on
            efforts  between  clinicians,  engineers, and  patients  are   reasonable request.
            essential to develop tailored solutions that maximize
            the benefits of robotic technology while addressing the   References
            unique  requirements  of  individuals  living  with  ALS.  In   1.   Hardiman  O, Al-Chalabi  A,  Chio  A,  et al.  Amyotrophic
            addition,  longitudinal  studies  tracking  the  real-world   lateral sclerosis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3:17071.
            implementation of robotic AI-enabled systems in ALS
            and neuromuscular diseases in general will be crucial to      doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.71
            evaluate their long-term efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and   2.   Kiernan MC, Vucic S, Cheah BC, et al. Amyotrophic lateral
            impact on patient outcomes.                           sclerosis. Lancet. 2011;377(9769):942-955.

              Finally, the assistive and collaborative robots have the      doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61156-7
            potential to take on a larger role in various tasks in the   3.   Brown RH, Al-Chalabi A. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
            future. We believe that our research can contribute to   N Engl J Med. 2017;377(2):162-172.
            this by exploring how humans and robots can effectively      doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1603471
            collaborate in a clinical setting. The goal is not necessarily
            a complete replacement,  but rather  a  complementary   4.   Chio A, Calvo A, Moglia C, Mazzini L, Mora G, PARALS
            approach where robots handle repetitive or hazardous   Study Group. Phenotypic heterogeneity of amyotrophic
            tasks, freeing humans for more strategic endeavors.   lateral sclerosis: A  population based study.  J  Neurol
                                                                  Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011;82(7):740-746.
            Acknowledgments                                       doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2010.235952
            None.                                              5.   Franchignoni F, Mora G, Giordano A, Volanti P, Chio A.


            Volume 1 Issue 4 (2024)                         82                               doi: 10.36922/aih.3732
   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93