Page 62 - AIH-2-1
P. 62

Artificial Intelligence in Health                                Algorithm and metal oxide nanoparticle in MRI




                         A                          B
















            Figure 1. Phantom and its respective magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for signal intensity analysis of the metal oxide nanoparticles (NPs). (A) Phantom
            used in the experiment. (B) MRI slice, with various metal oxide NPs being marked using different colors

            2.5. Manual evaluation: MRI signal quantification   segmentation, the algorithm autonomously calculated T1
            and relaxation time evaluation                     based on Equation I. For this, the algorithm detected and
            The MRI scans, obtained in the digital imaging and   stored the signal intensity value Y by treating A and B as
            communications in medicine (DICOM) format, were    constants, and the TI value was input by the operator. Using
            manually analyzed using Image J and 3D Slicer software.   these parameters, the algorithm automatically calculated
            A quantitative assessment of the mean signal intensity was   and outputted the  T1 value. To validate and ensure the
            performed for each compartment of the phantom, across   reproducibility of quantification, a Bland‒Altman plot was
            various concentrations and TE. The manual calculation of   created to compare automated T1 quantification, with the
            T1 relaxation time was executed using Equation I:  manual approach using Equation I and Image J. 49,50

                       − TI                                  3. Results
            Y =  A Be−      1 T                     (I)
                                                               3.1. Characterization of the NPs
              where  Y denotes the signal intensity,  TI represents   The chemical structures, crystal lattice indices, and
            the inversion time,  A signifies a scaling factor for each   crystallite sizes of the five NPs were determined using
            signal intensity, and B denotes the quality of inversion.    XRD and FTIR analyses. Figure 2 illustrates the combined
                                                         45
            Furthermore,  T2 relaxation times were determined by   chemical (FTIR) and structural (XRD) results of all NPs.
            fitting the ET signal curve using Equation II:
                                                               The characteristic absorption bands of the metal‒oxygen
                       TE                                      bond   were  prominently  observed  at  1500  –  400  cm .
                                                                                                            −1
                                                                   51
            S ( ) =TE  S máx e T 2  + S ,              (II)    Furthermore, in all FTIR spectra, absorption bands
                            n
                                                               were consistently observed at 2341 and 2358 cm , likely
                                                                                                       −1
              where S  corresponds to the noise level in the image. 45
                     n                                         attributable to atmospheric CO  absorption on metallic
                                                                                         2
            2.6. Automatic evaluation: Algorithm development   cations, a phenomenon that may have occurred within the
                                                               apparatus during analysis.
            The MRI images, obtained in the DICOM format, underwent
            preprocessing in three stages: (I) Reconfiguration to   The XRD spectrum of Co O  NPs in Figure 2A reveals
                                                                                        4
                                                                                      3
            1-mm  resolution, (II) application of an anisotropic   distinct peaks at 2θ values of 31.45°, 37.17°, 38.79°, 45.10°,
                 3
            diffusion filter, and (III) intensity correction for magnetic   59.72°, 65.54°, and 74.43°, corresponding to the lattice
            field inhomogeneity.  First, T1-weighted and T2-weighted   planes (220), (311), (222), (400), (511), (440), and (620),
                            11
            images were resliced to an isotropic resolution of 1 mm³   respectively. These peaks confirm the cubic phase of Co O
                                                                                                             4
                                                                                                           3
            using cubic spline interpolation. Second, an anisotropic   (JCPDS: 65-3103), with lattice parameters a = b = c = 8.056
            diffusion filter was employed to mitigate potential noise in   Å. 38,52  The FTIR spectrum of these NPs in Figure 2B displays
            the images. 46,47  Finally, image homogeneity was enhanced   two vibrational modes at 667 and 561 cm , indicative of
                                                                                                 −1
            through bias correction using an N4ITK filter. 48  Co‒O bonds. 53,54
              After preprocessing, the algorithm segmented the   Figure  2C presents the XRD spectrum of CuO NPs,
            region of interest (ROI) for the automatic determination of   where 2θ peaks aligned with the lattice planes (110), (111),
            the longitudinal relaxation time (T1). Following this ROI   (−112), (−202), (020), (202), (−113), (−311), (113), (311),
            Volume 2 Issue 1 (2025)                         56                               doi: 10.36922/aih.3947
   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67