Page 93 - AIH-2-4
P. 93

Artificial Intelligence in Health                            Federated learning health stack against pandemics



            90% attack accuracy in FL environments. To mitigate   supporting equitable participation. Nonetheless, system
            these attacks, a membership inference defense mechanism   heterogeneity  continues  to  extend  training  time  due  to
            named DefMIA was introduced, which adds adversarial   hardware capabilities and network disparities, increase
            perturbations to global model parameters, reducing attack   client dropout rates, and introduce latency, all of which
            accuracy to approximately 50% without affecting model   hinder overall FL performance. These challenges warrant
            performance. Overall, GAN-based FL remains susceptible   further research.
            to accuracy degradation and privacy concerns when
            applied to non-IID medical data, necessitating critical   5. Conclusion
            evaluation and ongoing refinement.                 In this article, a hierarchical FL framework is

              Model heterogeneity refers to differences across model   proposed, designed to enhance scalability, security, and
            architectures, capacities, and training approaches across   computational efficiency through multilevel aggregation
            medical centers. Before FL implementation, architectural   and HE, enabling effective responses to future pandemics.
            compatibility  must be  ensured to  facilitate  effective   FL is a decentralized ML paradigm in which each client
            knowledge transfer across diverse model structures without   trains a model on local data and shares only model updates
            compromising performance. Scale adaptability should also   with a central server, thus preserving data privacy. The
            be enabled in the platform to accommodate the varying   hierarchical structure, consisting of client nodes, local
            computational capabilities of institutions by enabling   servers, and a central server, supports distributed learning
            flexible model sizes. In addition, knowledge alignment   and  efficient  communication.  Local  servers  perform
            mechanisms are needed to coordinate learning across   intermediate aggregation, reducing communication costs
            heterogeneous models. Personalization support should   and enhancing scalability. The proposed framework
            be enabled to address institution-specific requirements or   supports dynamic data and can be extended to train
            patient groups without compromising the global model’s   specialized models at the central unit based on data
            integrity or performance. Therefore, to address model   characteristics. It ensures secure model updates through
            variation, a hierarchical self-distillation approach, such as   parameter encryption and seamless integration with
            HierarchyFL,   is recommended.  This  method  facilitates   ByITFL, which incorporates Byzantine fault tolerance and
                      70
            architecture compatibility by enabling resource-limited   information-theoretic privacy protection, strengthening
            centers to efficiently learn from advanced models deployed   the integrity and confidentiality of updates during
            at major sites. However, conventional aggregation   aggregation.
            techniques, such as FedAvg, cannot be directly applied in   To address the demands of medical image-based
            this setting. In addition, model architecture inconsistencies   diagnostics, the framework is adaptable to advanced
            reduce knowledge transfer, as some clients may be unable   CNN architectures, such as ResNet34, DenseNet121, and
            to contribute weights, leading to performance degradation   EfficientNet, which have demonstrated high accuracy
            and inconsistency.                                 in tasks such as COVID-19 detection. Similarly, in lung
              System heterogeneity refers to differences in    nodule detection, the incorporation of modular clustering
            computational  resources,  storage  capacity,  and  and transfer learning enhances imaging operations by
            communication bandwidth. Strategies to manage these   efficiently identifying ROI, reducing resource usage
            differences are essential. Resource-conscious participation   while improving diagnostic accuracy. On the other
            should be prioritized, with computational overhead   hand, blockchain-based smart contracts facilitate trusted
            adapted to each institution’s hardware and network   coordination among participants, while GANs contribute
            capacity. Efficiency in communication is also required for   to standardized data processing. Experiments conducted
            optimal data transfer, particularly within low or unstable   using the Flower framework and TenSEAL on the MNIST
            bandwidth settings. Furthermore, storage efficiency should   dataset demonstrated improved model accuracy, reduced
            accommodate institutions with limited infrastructure   training time per round, and lower communication
            to ensure broad participation. Power efficiency is also   overhead due to the scope of optimized intermediate
            important, especially for edge devices,  to reduce power   aggregation.
            consumption with consistent performance within clinical   Overall, the  proposed  framework  offers a  scalable,
            settings. A  framework incorporating client selection   privacy-preserving,  and  computation-efficient  solution
            through reinforcement learning and resource-aware   for digital healthcare. These advancements collectively
            metrics, such as that proposed in personalized FL,  is   position the proposed framework as a robust approach for
                                                       71
            recommended. This framework performs federation tasks   addressing future healthcare challenges and responding
            dynamically according to each center’s available resources,   effectively to potential pandemics.



            Volume 2 Issue 4 (2025)                         87                          doi: 10.36922/AIH025080013
   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98