Page 56 - AJWEP-22-6
P. 56

Bahar, et al.

                         v                                          wind speed modeling. 14,20,32   The  MEP maximizes  the
                v  = =                                       (III)  Shannon entropy subject to constraints derived from
                   c
                      Γ      + 1  1   
                          k                                       empirical data, resulting in the least-biased probability
                                                                    distribution consistent with known information.
                                                                       To provide a more intuitive understanding, the
                                  1      2  2 
                σ =  v    + 1     −       Γ  + 1         Γ    c  (IV)  MEP can be viewed as a method for deriving the most
                            k       k                     unbiased probability  distribution  when only limited
                                                                    information  (such as average  values  or moments)  is
                  where  Γ denotes the gamma function.  The EPF     known. By maximizing  entropy, the  approach  avoids
                method, based on the ratio of the third moment to the   introducing  unwarranted assumptions or bias beyond
                cube of the first moment of the wind speed, is defined   the  constraints  imposed  by  the  data.  This  leads  to  a
                in Equation V. The shape parameter k is calculated with   distribution  that best represents the true uncertainty
                Equation VI, followed by parameter c derived from k   inherent in the wind speed data. The advantage of using
                and the mean wind speed.                            MEP  lies  in  its  flexibility  and  minimal  assumptions,
                                                                    allowing it to adapt to complex wind speed behaviors
                          1    n  3 )                               that may not be well captured by standard parametric
                                v
                      v 3  n  (∑ i =1 i                             models, such as Weibull. This makes MEP especially
                EPF  =  =                                     (V)
                      v  3    1  n    3                           useful in environments where wind regimes are highly
                                v
                              =1 i   ∑ i                          variable or poorly characterized by simple distributions.
                                  n
                                                                    The constraints are: (i) The total probability within the
                      3.69                                          defined speed interval must be equal to one, as shown
                 = +
                k   1                                        (VI)   in Equation VII; (ii) The M-low statistical orders for the
                     (EPF ) 2                                       theoretical and empirical distributions must be equal, as
                                                                    shown in Equation VIII. The general solution is shown
                  By applying both methods, the parameter estimates   in Equation IX.
                were cross-validated to ensure consistency and to improve
                the fit of the Weibull model to the observed wind speed   ∫  maxf  ()v  f  ( ) v dv = 1         (VII)
                data. Beyond the  Weibull distribution, several other   0
                statistical models have been proposed for calculating
                wind speed distributions, each with its specific advantages   maxf v () vf vdvv                (VIII)

                and limitations. The Rayleigh distribution, a special case    0
                of Weibull with k = 2, has been used due to its simplicity,     M  i )                           (IX)
                                                                                    i
                but may lack flexibility for complex wind regimes. 11,19    fv () = exp  i (∑  =1 a v
                The Lognormal distribution has also been employed,
                especially when the Weibull does not efficiently capture   where  α  is the  Lagrangian  multiplier found using
                                                                              i
                skewness in data. 17,24  Advanced parametric models, such   the Newton-Raphson method.  Other non-parametric
                as the Gamma and Beta distributions, can fit wind speed   methods,  including  kernel  density  estimation  and
                data with multimodal features or specific skewness and   empirical  distribution functions, have also been used
                kurtosis patterns. 18,27,31  However, these models typically   to  model  wind  speed  without  assuming  a  predefined
                require more data and computational effort, which may   functional  form.  These data-driven  approaches  can
                not always be feasible.                             capture  complex  distribution  shapes,  but  they  might
                  Weibull distribution is chosen in this study due to   require large datasets to achieve their effectiveness. 13,27,33,34
                its proven robustness, simplicity, and widespread   The combined use of Weibull distribution and MEP in
                acceptance  in wind energy studies, which makes it   this  study leverages  the  robustness and  simplicity  of
                suitable for the available Mongo dataset. Nevertheless, to   a  classical  parametric  model  with  the  flexibility  of  a
                overcome limitations linked to parametric assumptions,   non-parametric  approach,  providing  a  comprehensive
                complementary methods are considered.               characterization of the wind speed regime at Mongo.

                2.3. Statistical modeling using the MEP             2.3.1. Wind power density estimation
                In addition to parametric  methods, non-parametric   The wind power density represents the kinetic energy
                approaches,  such  as  the  MEP  have  been  applied  to   flux per unit area, as shown in Equation X.



                Volume 22 Issue 6 (2025)                        50                           doi: 10.36922/AJWEP025070039
   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61