Page 57 - AJWEP-22-6
P. 57

Statistical analysis of wind energy

                   P   1   ∞                                        (v)  Hysteresis analysis to detect phase lag or cyclical
                             3
                E =  =  ρ   v f  ( ) v dv                     (X)
                   A   2  ∫ 0                                           wind–temperature interactions. 30,37
                  where E is the power density (W/m²),  ρ is the air   This  methodology  aims  to  elucidate  the  role  of
                density (1.225 kg/m³), and f(v) is the wind speed PDF   temperature as a modulator of wind patterns in Mongo’s
                (Weibull  or  MEP).  Accurate  modeling  of  the  wind   Sahelian  climate,  supporting  refined  assessments  of
                speed distribution  is crucial  for realistic  energy yield   wind energy potential.
                estimates. 35
                                                                    3. Results and discussion
                2.3.2. Wind direction analysis using a wind rose
                An assessment of wind direction was performed using   3.1. Wind speed analyses
                monthly averaged data collected from 2012 to 2022.   Table 1 summarizes the monthly and annual mean wind
                The directional values were categorized into 16 equally   speeds over the 2012 – 2022 period. All annual mean
                spaced compass sectors, each covering 22.5°, to ensure   values  exceed the  minimum  exploitable wind speed
                adequate  angular  resolution  over the  full  360° range.   threshold of 2.0  m/s, demonstrating  that Mongo has
                This segmentation enables the systematic quantification   a usable, albeit modest, wind resource.  The highest
                of the directional distribution of the wind over the study   annual average wind speed was recorded in 2012, with
                period.                                             4.61 m/s, and the lowest in 2022, at 1.80 m/s. This range
                  The frequency of wind blowing from each sector is   aligns  with  wind  regimes  classified  as  Class  1  under
                calculated with Equation XI.                        International  Electrotechnical Commission standards,
                                                                    generally suited for small-scale or hybrid wind power
                    n                                               applications. 6,17,23,28
                f =  N i  ×100                               (XI)      Figure  1 illustrates  the  monthly  wind speed
                 i
                  where f  is the frequency (in percent) of wind coming   evolution over 11  years, presenting a 3D temporal
                         i
                from direction sector i; n  is the number of wind direction   profile  (Figure 1A) and a 2D  projection (Figure 1B).
                                     i
                observations in that sector, and N is the total number of   The temporal signal (Figure  2A) illustrates bursting
                valid wind direction records.                       behavior characterized  by short-term spikes in wind
                  The  data  were processed using meteorological    speed,  which  may  be  attributed  to  local  convective
                statistical  tools  capable  of  handling  directional   phenomena  and  regional  climate  influences. 6,14,18  The
                classification and frequency analysis. No filtering based   long-term monthly mean (Figure 2B) reveals a seasonal
                on wind speed threshold was applied in this computation   pattern with higher wind speeds during specific months,
                phase to preserve the full angular distribution of wind   consistent with similar patterns observed in semi-arid
                occurrence. The results of this procedure served as input   regions, such as Central  Iran and Northern India. 18,19
                for constructing a wind rose diagram, which reflects the   These temporal and seasonal variations underscore the
                statistical dispersion of wind direction at the site. 8,36  importance  of temporal  resolution in wind resource
                                                                    assessment and planning. The relatively low but stable
                2.4. Temperature analysis and wind temperature      wind speeds suggest Mongo’s wind energy applications
                relationship assessment                             should focus on micro or small wind turbine systems
                Air temperature affects atmospheric pressure gradients   designed for low-wind regimes. 17,23,28
                and  convective  flows,  shaping  wind  dynamics. 28,29
                Monthly average temperatures from 2012 to 2022 were   3.2. Probability distribution and wind power
                analyzed through:                                   The  Weibull distribution parameters, shape factor
                (i)  Time  series analysis to identify  seasonal  and   (k)  and  scale  factor  (c),  were  computed  numerically
                   interannual variability                          (Equations I – IV) and are presented in Table 2 for annual
                (ii)  Graphical superimposition of temperature and wind   data, and Table 3 for monthly data. These parameters
                   speed for concurrent trend detection             were used to construct the wind speed PDF shown in
                (iii) Scatter plots to assess preliminary correlations  Figure 3, where the mode centers around 3.25 m/s, close
                (iv) Regression modeling  (linear  and non-linear)  to   to  the  mean  wind  speed. This  confirms  the  adequacy
                   quantify relationships, evaluated by determination   of the Weibull model for this dataset, as supported by
                   coefficient (R²)                                 studies in Turkey, Iran, and Canada. 12,13,15,18,23




                Volume 22 Issue 6 (2025)                        51                           doi: 10.36922/AJWEP025070039
   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62