Page 136 - {PDF Title}
P. 136

Vardhini and Nakka

                 Table 4. Results of MGs under various conditions
                 Specification                                    Without RERs      ZOA        MFOA         SFSN
                 Energy losses (kWh)                                 1.4×10 5     7.434×10 4  7.98140×10 4  7.74459×10 4
                 The amount of procurement energy from substation (kWh)  3.2088×10 6  1.3802×10 6  1.5356×10 6  1.4434×10 6
                 PV unit (kW)                                           -           215          295         230
                 WT unit (kW)                                           -           147          135         208
                 Cost of energy loss ($)                            7.0341×10 3  4.7888×10 3  4.6876×10 3  4.6467×10 3
                 Cost of purchase energy ($)                        8.8403×10 5  3.1426×10 5  2.9426×10 5  3.0915×10 5
                 Cost PV ($)                                            -        3.71928×10 4  3.23764×10 4  2.90563×10 4
                 Cost of wind turbine ($)                               -        7.15469×10 4  1.25469×10 5  1.05425×10 5
                 Total cost ($)                                    0.89106×10 6  0.4277×10 6  0.4567×10 6  0.4482×10 6
                 Abbreviations: MFOA: Moth-flame optimization algorithm; MGs: Microgrids; PV: Photovoltaic; RERs: Renewable energy resources;
                 SFSN: Stochastic fractal search Network; ZOA: Zebra optimization algorithm.

                               A                                  B










                    Figure 10. Input profile under probabilistic conditions: (A) PV solar irradiance, and (B) wind speed
                                                    Abbreviation: PV: Photovoltaic.


                              A                                    B









                Figure 11. Per unit voltage of a microgrid under probabilistic conditions: (A) without RER, and (B) with RER
                                             Abbreviation: RER: Renewable energy resource.


                                                                    emphasis  with  and  without  considering  RERs  under
                                                                    probabilistic circumstances. The proposed Ideal REEM,
                                                                    regardless  of  RERs,  prompts  a  better  voltage  profile.
                                                                    Figure 12 further shows that RERs essentially cut down
                                                                    on power losses (kW). Figure 13A portrays the PV yield
                                                                    power and Figure 13B shows the WT yield power, with
                                                                    both fluctuating with PV illumination and wind speed
                                                                    (Figure 10). A correlation of the two variables uncovers
                Figure 12. Power losses under probabilistic scenario  that PV power changes with contrasts in irradiance while
                                                                    WT power changes  with  variations  in  turbine  speed.
                into consideration, the ideal sizes (kW) of the PV and   Microgrid  framework  execution  and  sustainable  asset
                WT are 386 and 60, respectively, which are recorded in   use are both upgraded by the streamlined EM approach
                Table 3. Figure 11 portrays the voltage profiles at various   that considers vulnerabilities and the RER combination.





                Volume 22 Issue 1 (2025)                       130                           doi: 10.36922/AJWEP025050030
   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141