Page 87 - {PDF Title}

Water quality and health risks

District. GUB J Sci Eng. 2021;7:36-41. doi: 10.5620/eaht.2020019
doi: 10.3329/gubjse.v7i0.54019 38. United States Environmental Protection Agency
26. Department of Public Health Engineering (DPHE). (USEPA). Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund
SFD (Lite) Report - Kushtia Municipality, Bangladesh. Volume I: Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part A).
SUSANA. Department of Public Health Engineering; United States Environmental Protection Agency;
2024. Available from: https://www.susana.org/ 1989. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/risk/risk-
knowledge-hub/resources?id=5287 [Last accessed on assessment-guidance-superfund-rags-part [Last accessed
2025 Feb 08]. on 2024 Jul 29].
27. Janardhanan S, Islam MM, Islam MT, et al. Groundwater 39. Dayananda NR, Liyanage JA. Quest to assess potentially
balance and long-term storage trends in the regional Indo- nephrotoxic heavy metal contaminants in edible wild and
Gangetic aquifer in Northwest Bangladesh. J Hydrol Reg commercial inland fish species and associated reservoir
Stud. 2023;49:101500. sediments; A study in a CKDU prevailed area, Sri Lanka.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejrh.2023.101500 Expo Health. 2021;13(3):567-581.
28. Abanyie SK, Apea OB, Abagale SA, Amuah EEY, doi: 10.1007/s12403-021-00403-x
Sunkari ED. Sources and factors influencing groundwater 40. Shaibur MR, Howlader M, Ahmmed I, Sarwar S,
quality and associated health implications: A review. Hussam A. Water quality index and health risk
Emerg Contam. 2023;9(2):100207. assessment for heavy metals in groundwater of Kashiani
doi: 10.1016/j.emcon.2023.100207 and Kotalipara upazila, Gopalganj, Bangladesh. Appl
29. Fayshal MA, Jarin TT, Rahman MA, Kabir S. From Water Sci. 2024;14(5):106.
Source to Use: Performance Evaluation of Water doi: 10.1007/s13201-024-02169-4
Treatment Plant in KUET, Khulna, Bangladesh. In: 41. Rice EW, Bridgewater L, American Public Health
Proceedings of International Conference on Planning, Association, editors. Standard Methods for the
Architecture and Civil Engineering; 2023. Examination of Water and Wastewater. Vol. 10. United
30. Kopp JF. Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and States: American Public Health Association; 2012.
Wastes. United States: Environmental Monitoring and 42. Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH). Commonly
Support Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, Found Substances in Drinking Water and Available
US Environmental Protection Agency; 1979. Treatment. Illinois Department of Public Health; 2024.
31. Von Sperling M, Verbyla ME, Oliveira SM. Assessment Available from: https://dph.illinois.gov/topics-services/
of Treatment Plant Performance and Water Quality Data: environmental-health-protection/private-water/fact-
A Guide for Students, Researchers and Practitioners. sheets/common-substances-drinking-water.html [Last
United Kingdom: IWA Publishing; 2020. accessed on 2024 Jul 15].
doi: 10.2166/9781780409320 43. Omer NH. Water Quality Parameters. London:
32. Horton RK. An index number system for rating water IntechOpen; 2020.
quality. J Water Pollut Control Fed. 1965;37(3):300-306. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.89657
33. Brown RM, McClelland NI, Deininger RA, Tozer RG. 44. Jung H, Kim U, Seo G, Lee H, Lee C. Effect of dissolved
A water quality index-do we dare. Water Sew Works. oxygen (DO) on internal corrosion of water pipes.
1970;117(10):339-343. Environ Eng Res. 2009;14(3):195-199.
34. Chatterjee PR, Raziuddin M. Studies on the water doi: 10.4491/eer.2009.14.3.195
quality of a water body at Asansol town, West Bengal. 45. Kumar R, Kumar A. Water Analysis. Biochemical
Nat Environ Pollut Technol. 2007;6(2):289-292. Oxygen Demand. In: Encyclopedia of Analytical Science.
35. Monira U, Sattar GS, Mostafa MG. Assessment of Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2005. p. 315-324.
surface water quality using the Water Quality Index doi: 10.1016/b0-12-369397-7/00662-2
(WQI) and Multivariate Statistical Analysis (MSA), 46. Islam M, Shafi S, Bandh SA, Shameem N. Impact of
around tannery industry effluent discharge areas. H2Open environmental changes and human activities on bacterial
J. 2024;7(2):130-148. diversity of lakes. In: Freshwater Microbiology:
doi: 10.2166/h2oj.2024.099 Perspectives of Bacterial Dynamics in Lake Ecosystems.
36. United States Environmental Protection Agency Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2019. p. 105-136.
(USEPA). Human Health Risk Assessment. United States doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-817495-1.00003-7
Environmental Protection Agency; 2023. Available from: 47. Yuen H, Becker W. Iron toxicity. In: StatPearls. Treasure
https://www.epa.gov/risk/human-health-risk-assessment Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2025. Available from:
[Last accessed on 2024 Jul 30]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459224 [Last
37. Sharma SD. Risk assessment via oral and dermal accessed on 2024 Aug 01].
pathways from heavy metal polluted water of Kolleru 48. Egorova NA, Kanatnikova NV. Effect of iron in drinking
Lake - A Ramsar wetland in Andhra Pradesh, India. water on the morbidity rate in the population of the city
Environ Anal Health Toxicol. 2020;35(3):e2020019. of Orel. Gig Sanit. 2017;96(11):1049-1053.

Volume 22 Issue 1 (2025) 81 doi: 10.36922/ajwep.8163