Page 88 - {PDF Title}

Hossain, et al.

doi: 10.47470/0016-9900-2017-96-11-1049-1053 in Old Dhaka, Bangladesh. Int J Environ Prot Policy.
49. Rahman MA, Islam MR, Kumar S, Al-Reza SM. 2015;3(2):1.
Drinking water quality, exposure and health risk doi: 10.11648/j.ijepp.s.2015030201.11
assessment for the school-going children at school time 59. Mora R, Hopkins P, Cote E, Shie T. Pipeline Integrity
in the southwest coastal of Bangladesh. J Water Sanit Management Systems: A Practical Approach. New York:
Hyg Dev. 2021;11:612-628. ASME Press; 2016.
doi: 10.2166/washdev.2021.016 doi: 10.1115/1.861110
50. DeZuane J. Handbook of Drinking Water Quality. United 60. Hossain MA, Haque MI, Parvin MA, Islam MN.
States: John Wiley and Sons; 1997. Evaluation of iron contamination in groundwater with
51. Saisyo A, Shimono R, Oie S, Kimura K, Furukawa H. its associated health risk and potentially suitable depth
The risk of microbial contamination in multiple-dose analysis in Kushtia Sadar Upazila of Bangladesh.
preservative-free ophthalmic preparations. Biol Pharm Groundw Sustain Dev. 2023;21:100946.
Bull. 2017;40(2):182-186. doi: 10.1016/j.gsd.2023.100946
doi: 10.1248/bpb.b16-00688 61. Islam MN, Haque MI, Hossain MA. Spatial pattern of
52. Guo Q. Correlation of Total Suspended Solids (TSS) arsenic concentration and associated noncarcinogenic
and Suspended Sediment Concentration (SSC) Test health risk assessment: A case study on Gangni Union
Methods. Rutgers University, Department of Civil and of Chuadanga district of Bangladesh. Environ Syst Res.
Environmental Engineering; 2006. 2023;12(1):29.
53. Davis ML. Water and Wastewater Engineering: Design doi: 10.1186/s40068-023-00313-8
Principles and Practice. United States: McGraw-Hill; 62. Qin Q, Lu H, Zhu Z, Sui M, Qiu Y, Yin D. Reduction in
2010. arsenic exposure by domestic water purification devices
54. Minnesota Department of Health (MDH). Bacteria, in Shanghai area and related health Risk Assessment.
Viruses, and Parasites in Drinking Water. Minnesota Water. 2021;13(20):2916.
Department of Health; 2023. Available from: https:// doi: 10.3390/w13202916
www.health.state.mn.us/communities/environment/ 63. Ghosh S, Chaudhari S. Arsenic removal using
water/contaminants/bacteria.html [Last accessed on electrocoagulation followed by a hematite granular filter.
2024 Jul 15]. Water Supply. 2022;22(12):9041-9047.
55. Ezeki̇El S, Joshua W, Wi̇Lli̇Ams AG. Assessing the doi: 10.2166/ws.2022.383
efficiency of the drinking water treatment plant and 64. Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh,
the impact of broken distribution systems on the water Ministry of Environment and Forest (MoEF).
quality of the Wukari-Ibi plant. Environ Res Technol. Environment Conservation Rules (ECR). New Delhi:
2022;5(2):155-164. Ministry of Environment and Forest; 1997.
doi: 10.35208/ert.1044500 65. Suslow TV. Oxidation-Reduction Potential (ORP) for Water
56. Plumb J, Puzon G, Ginige M. The impact of biofilms Disinfection Monitoring, Control, and Documentation.
on water quality in long pipelines. Microbiol Aust. California: UC Agriculture and Natural Resources; 2004.
2009;30(1):16. 66. United States Environmental Protection Agency
doi: 10.1071/ma09016 (USEPA). Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund
57. Müller A, Österlund H, Marsalek J, Viklander M. The Volume I: Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part E,
pollution conveyed by urban runoff: A review of sources. Supplemental Guidance for Dermal Risk Assessment).
Sci Total Environ. 2019;709:136125. United States Environmental Protection Agency;
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136125 2004. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/risk/risk-
58. Hossain T, Sikder MT, Jakariya M. Assessment of assessment-guidance-superfund-rags-part-e [Last
public health affected by municipal piped water supply accessed on 2024 Jul 29].

Volume 22 Issue 1 (2025) 82 doi: 10.36922/ajwep.8163