Page 119 - AJWEP-v22i2
P. 119

Assessing drought impacts for adaptive response

                   motivational  roots of farmers’ adaptation  to  climate   60.  Savari  M, Khaleghi  B.  Application  of the  extended
                   change induced water stress through incentives or norms.   theory of planned behavior in predicting the behavioral
                   Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):15208.                           intentions of Iranian local communities  toward forest
                   doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19384-1                      conservation. Front Psychol. 2023;14:1121396.
                48.  Callejas Moncaleano DC, Pande S, Rietveld L. Water use      doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1121396
                   efficiency: A review of contextual and behavioral factors.   61.  De Leeuw A, Valois P, Ajzen I, Schmidt P. Using the
                   Front Water. 2021;3:685650.                          theory of planned behavior to identify key beliefs
                   doi: 10.3389/frwa.2021.685650                        underlying  pro-environmental  behavior  in high-school
                49.  Khoshnodifar Z, Karimi  H,  Ataei  P. Mechanisms  to   students:  Implications  for educational  interventions.
                   change farmers’ drought adaptation behaviors in Sistan   J Environ Psychol. 2015;42:128-138.
                   and Baluchistan Province, Iran. Front Sustain Food Syst.      doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.03.005
                   2023;7:1121254.                                  62.  Han H. The norm activation model and theory-broadening:
                   doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2023.1121254                      Individuals’ decision-making  on environmentally-
                50.  Layani G, Bakhshoodeh M. Water security in Kowsar   responsible convention attendance.  J  Environ Psychol.
                   Dam basin under climate  variability:  Application   2014;40:462-471.
                   of system dynamics approach.  Agric Econ (Karaj).      doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.10.006
                   2019;13(1):47-72.                                63.  Zhang L, Ruiz-Menjivar J, Luo B, Liang Z, Swisher ME.
                   doi: 10.22034/IAES.2019.98544.1649                   Predicting  climate  change  mitigation  and adaptation
                51.  Regional  Water Company of Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-   behaviors in agricultural  production: A  comparison of
                   Ahmad. Comprehensive Reports of Water Resources of   the  theory  of planned  behavior  and the  Value-Belief-
                   Kowsar Basin; 2019. (In Persian)                     Norm Theory. J Environ Psychol. 2020;68:101408.
                52.  Luís S, Lima ML, Roseta-Palma C, et al. Psychosocial      doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101408
                   drivers  for change:  Understanding  and  promoting   64.  Yazdanpanah  M, Forouzani M.  Application  of the
                   stakeholder engagement in local adaptation  to climate   theory of planned behaviour to predict Iranian students’
                   change in three European Mediterranean  case studies.   intention  to purchase organic food.  J  Clean Prod.
                   J Environ Manag. 2018;223:165-174.                   2015;107:342-352.
                   doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.06.020                   doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.071
                53.  Yates D, Sieber J, Purkey D, Huber-Lee A. WEAP21 - a   65.  Hair JF, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M, Thiele KO.
                   demand-,  priority-,  and  preference-driven  water   Mirror, mirror on the wall: A comparative evaluation of
                   planning model. Part 1: Model characteristics. Water Int.   composite-based structural equation modeling methods.
                   2005;30(4):487-500.                                  J Acad Mark Sci. 2017;45:616-632.
                   doi: 10.1080/02508060508691893                       doi: 10.1007/s11747-017-0517-x
                54.  Sieber  J, Purkey D.  WEAP, Water Evaluation  and   66.  Khoshmaram M, Shiri N, Shinnar RS, Savari M.
                   Planning  System. User Guide. Sweden: Stockholm      Environmental  support and entrepreneurial  behavior
                   Environment Institute, U.S. Center; 2011.            among  Iranian  farmers:  The  mediating  roles  of
                55.  Howitt R. Positive mathematical  programming.  Am J   social  and human  capital.  J  Small  Bus Manag.
                   Agric Econ. 1995;77:329-342.                         2020;58(5):1064-1088.
                56.  Heckelei T. Calibration and Estimation of Programming      doi: 10.1111/jsbm.12501
                   Models  for Agricultural  Supply  Analysis. PhD thesis.   67.  Reidsma P, Ewert F, Lansink AO, Leemans R. Adaptation
                   Germany: University of Bonn; 2002.                   to  climate  change  and  climate  variability  in  European
                57.  Heckelei T, Britz W. Positive mathematical programming   agriculture: The importance of farm level responses. Eur
                   with multiple data points: A cross-sectional estimation   J Agron. 2010;32:91-102.
                   procedure. Cahiers Econ Sociol Rural. 2000;57:27-50.     doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2009.06.003
                   doi: 10.3406/reae.2000.1649                      68.  Westerhoff L, Smit B.  The rains are disappointing
                58.  Greaves M, Zibarras LD, Stride C. Using the theory of   us: Dynamic  vulnerability  and  adaptation  to  multiple
                   planned behavior to explore environmental  behavioral   stressors in the Afram Plains, Ghana. Mitig Adapt Strateg
                   intentions in the workplace.  J  Environ Psychol.    Glob Chang. 2008;14:317-337.
                   2013;34:109-120.                                     doi: 10.1007/s11027-008-9166-1
                   doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.02.003                 69.  Yaghoubi J, Yazdanpanah M, Komendantova N. Iranian
                59.  Azarm H, Bakhshoodeh M, Zibaei  M, Nasrnia F.      agriculture  advisors’ perception and intention  toward
                   Incorporating land use changes and pastoralists’ behavior   biofuel:  Green way toward energy security, rural
                   in  sustainable  rangeland  management:  Evidence  from   development  and climate  change  mitigation.  Renew
                   Iran. Rangeland Ecol Manag. 2022;80:48-60.           Energy. 2019;130:452-459.
                   doi: 10.1016/j.rama.2021.09.009                      doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.06.081





                Volume 22 Issue 2 (2025)                       113                                 doi: 10.36922/ajwep.8381
   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124