Page 76 - AN-3-3
P. 76

Advanced Neurology                                                            mTOR inhibition in epilepsy



            mTOR dual kinase inhibitors, not only suppress mTOC1   6.2.2. Focal cortical dysplasia
            and mTORC2 but also target additional pathways—either   In recent years, there has been growing interest in
            vertically along the same pathway by inhibiting  PI3K   the use of mTOR inhibitors for treating FCD Type  II.
            activity or horizontally by targeting HDAC or ATR proteins   Leitner  et   al.   observed  lower  ribosomal protein  S6
                                                                           83
            in different pathways.  Despite these advancements, the   phosphorylation in the brain tissues of patients with FCD
                              59
            clinical use of these drugs is still far from being established.
                                                               type II (n=9) and tuberous sclerosis complex (n=5) who
              Temsirolimus, an intravenous rapalog, was approved   had undergone surgical resection and were treated with
            by the U.S. FDA in 2007 for the treatment of advanced   everolimus, compared to the control group. These patients
            renal cell carcinoma (Table 1).  Deforolimus has shown   also exhibited higher synaptic transmission and cellular
                                     55
            promising clinical responses in metastatic soft tissue or   respiration, as well as lower levels of neuron ensheathment,
            bone sarcoma, but further studies on its safety and efficacy   nuclear  mRNA  catabolism,  and  organophosphate
            are still needed. 58                               metabolism (Table 3). Shiraishi et al.  reported a case of a
                                                                                            84
                                                               2-year-old girl who had surgical resection of FCD type II
            6.2. mTOR inhibitor used in non-tuberous sclerosis   at the age of 4 months. Her seizures recurred at the age
            complex-related epilepsy
                                                               of 1 year and 10 months and were refractory to various
            6.2.1. PMSE and hemimegalencephaly                 antiseizure medications. Treatment with sirolimus resulted
            One of the earliest descriptions of mTOR inhibitor use in non-  in a 95% seizure reduction over 92 weeks. 84
            tuberous sclerosis complex-related epilepsy was reported in   An open-label, multicenter clinical trial involving
            2013.   Parker  et al.  demonstrated that fibroblasts from   16 patients with FCD type II initiated oral sirolimus at an
                            80
                80
            skin biopsies of patients with PMSE had higher mTORC1   initial dose of 1 mg/d for patients with a weight of <40 kg
            activity compared to those from the control group and   and 2 mg/d for those weighing ≥40 kg, with subsequent
            their asymptomatic heterozygous parents. The mTORC1   titration to achieve a blood trough level of 5 – 15 ng/mL.
                                                                                                            85
            activity level and migration defects in these fibroblasts were   The trial reported a response rate of 33%, defined as the
            normalized with sirolimus. The authors further described   percentage of patients showing a seizure reduction of
            the clinical experience of sirolimus use in five patients with   ≥50% during the 12-week maintenance period. 85
            PMSE. Three patients achieved seizure freedom, whereas
            one experienced a 75% reduction in seizures (Table 3).  All   A recent double-blinded, crossover, randomized
                                                      80
            treated patients were more interactive or socially engaged   clinical trial involved 22 patients with FCD type II-related
            than untreated historical controls.  In this cohort, a   seizures, in which a population pharmacokinetic model of
                                         80
            3-month-old patient who received prophylactic sirolimus   everolimus was developed to explore its optimal dosage
                                                                     86
            treatment at 3  months of age remained seizure-free   regime.  The authors suggested that an initial everolimus
                                                                                2
            throughout the follow-up period, highlighting its potential   dose of 7 – 9 mg/m  should be used for patients with a
                                                                                                     2
                                                                                     2
            role as a disease-modifying agent. 80              body surface area of <1 m , and 6 – 7  mg/m  for those
                                                               with a body surface area between 1 and 2 m , to meet
                                                                                                     2
                        81
              Xu  et al.  reported a 6-day-old girl with       the target trough concentration of 5 – 15  ng/mL.  In
                                                                                                         86
            hemimegalencephaly due to a mosaic MTOR variant    a prospective,  randomized,  double-blinded, placebo-
            with 16% mosaicism. Her seizures were initially resistant   controlled, crossover, phase 2 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov:
            to nine antiseizure medications. While awaiting for   NCT03198949), the anti-epileptic efficacy of everolimus
            hemispherectomy, sirolimus treatment led to a >50%   was evaluated in patients aged 4 – 40  years who had
            reduction in seizures within 1  week and improved   pathologically confirmed FCD Type  II and drug-
            neurodevelopment in 2 weeks. 81                    resistant epilepsy with at least three seizures per month
                                                                          87
              On the other hand, Hadouiri et al.  reported a conflicting   for 2 months.  In the 4-week baseline phase, antiseizure
                                        82
            case involving a 12-year-old girl with hypomelanosis of Ito,   medications were kept constant, and seizure burden was
            focal cerebral hypertrophy involving the left hemisphere,   monitored. Patients were then randomly assigned in a 1:1
            and an  MTOR missense variant with 41% mosaicism   ratio to either the everolimus-first or placebo-first group
                                                                                        87
            in her skin-derived DNA. No seizure reduction was   for the 12-week core phase 1,  followed by a crossover
            observed after 5 months of everolimus treatment, and her   to the other treatment arm for another 12 weeks of core
            clinical condition continued to deteriorate.  The authors   phase 2. A 29-week unblinded extension phase was offered
                                               82
            hypothesized that the degree of mutation mosaicism, as   to all patients, during which they received everolimus if
                                                                            87
            well as the severity of epilepsy, might impact the efficacy of   they consented.  In the 1  4 weeks (titration period) of
                                                                                    st
            mTOR inhibitors, underscoring the challenges in treating   both core phases, everolimus was started at a daily dose
            this heterogeneous clinical entity of mTORopathies. 82  of 4.5 mg/m  and titrated to attain a trough concentration
                                                                         2
            Volume 3 Issue 3 (2024)                         12                               doi: 10.36922/an.3568
   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81