Page 91 - AN-4-1
P. 91

Advanced Neurology                                             Tetrapleura tetraptera protects the hippocampus




            Table 3. Seizure score differences on alternate day 11 between experimental groups after pentylenetetrazol administration
            Groups             PTZ            PTZ+SV         PTZ+TT (LD)        PTZ+TT (ID)       PTZ+TT (HD)
                               (n=7)           (n=7)            (n=7)              (n=7)             (n=7)
            Seizure scores    4.29±1.60       3.50±1.76       1.20±0.84**       1.00±0.63*** b      3.25±0.96
            Notes: One-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni’s post-hoc tests were performed. Values are expressed as mean±standard deviation. F=8.52,
            p<0.001. **Indicates a significant difference from the PTZ group at p<0.01. ***Represents a significant difference from the PTZ group at p<0.001.
            b Significantly different from the PTZ+SV group at p<0.05.
            Abbreviations: HD: High dose; ID: Intermediate dose; LD: Low dose; PTZ: Pentylenetetrazol; SV: Sodium valproate; TT: Tetrapleura tetraptera.


            Table 4. Quantal protection and mortality rate of the experimental groups after pentylenetetrazol administration
            Groups              Quantal protection  Percentage protection (%)  Mortality rate  Percentage mortality (%)
            PTZ (n=7)                 4/7                  57.14               3/7                42.86
            PTZ+SV (n=7)              6/7                  85.71               1/7                14.29
            PTZ+TT (LD) (n=7)         5/7                  71.42               2/7                28.58
            PTZ+TT (ID) (n=7)         6/7                  85.71               1/7                14.29
            PTZ+TT (HD) (n=7)         4/7                  57.14               3/7                42.86
            Abbreviations: HD: High dose; ID: Intermediate dose; LD: Low dose; PTZ: Pentylenetetrazol; SV: Sodium valproate; TT: Tetrapleura tetraptera.

                                                               the test groups and the control group, or among the test
                                                               groups. However, the number of other cresyl violet-stained
                                                               cell types in the sodium valproate and intermediate-dose
                                                               T. tetraptera-pretreated groups was significantly lower
                                                               (p<0.05) compared to the control group (Figure 3).

                                                               3.7. Neuron-specific enolase immunoreactivity
                                                               Expression of NSE was observed in the hippocampal CA3
                                                               region of the control group (Figure 4A). The hippocampal
                                                               CA3 regions of the T. tetraptera-alone and the low-dose
            Figure  1.  Spontaneous alternation behavior test. A  repeated measure   T. tetraptera-pretreated groups showed increased NSE
            analysis of variance and Tukey’s post-hoc tests. No significant differences   expression intensity throughout the layers compared to
            were observed among the groups (F=1.751; p=0.1475). Notes: Values are
            expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean. Sample size per group:   the control group (Figure 4B and E). The CA3 region of
            Control=5; TT=5; PTZ=4; PTZ+SV=4; PTZ+TT (low)= 4; PTZ+TT   the PTZ group also exhibited increased NSE expression
            (int)=5; PTZ +TT (high)=4.                         intensity throughout the layers compared to the control
            Abbreviations: PTZ: Pentylenetetrazol; SV: Sodium valproate;   group (Figure  4C). In contrast, the CA3 regions of
            TT: Tetrapleura tetraptera.                        the sodium valproate and the intermediate-  and high-
                                                               dose  T. tetraptera-pretreated groups showed reduced
            to the control group (Figure 2C). The hippocampal CA3   NSE expression intensity in some neurons of the layers
            layers in the groups pre-treated with sodium valproate   compared to the control group (Figure 4D, 4F, and 4G).
            or high-dose  T. tetraptera showed no apparent Nissl
            substance staining intensity compared to the control group   A  repeated  measures  analysis  of  variance  and
            (Figure 2D and G). Similarly, the CA3 region in the low-  post-hoc  tests  revealed  that  the  number  of  NSE-positive
            dose  T.  tetraptera-pretreated group showed no apparent   pyramidal cells was significantly higher (p<0.05) in the
            difference in Nissl substance staining intensity compared   T. tetraptera group, but significantly lower (p<0.05) in
            to the control group (Figure 2E). The CA3 region of the   the  PTZ  group  and  the  intermediate-  and  high-dose
            intermediate-dose  T.  tetraptera-pretreated group also   T. tetraptera-pre-treatment groups compared to the control
            showed no apparent difference in Nissl substance staining   group. There were significantly fewer (p<0.05) NSE-positive
                                                               pyramidal cells in the PTZ group compared to the  T.
            intensity compared to the control group (Figure 2F).
                                                               tetraptera-alone and sodium valproate-pretreated groups,
              A repeated measure analysis of variance and a Tukey’s   with no significant differences (p>0.05) when compared to
            post-hoc test revealed no significant difference (p>0.05) in   the low, intermediate, and high-dose T. tetraptera groups
            the number of cresyl violet-stained pyramidal cells between   (Figure 5).



            Volume 4 Issue 1 (2025)                         85                               doi: 10.36922/an.6862
   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96