Page 94 - AN-4-2
P. 94

Advanced Neurology                                                   PVT in Indonesian neurological patients



            one culture may not automatically apply to others. 13,24,25    semantic category as the ones on the first page (e.g., udang
            Finally, we anticipate a significant intercorrelation between   [prawn], terasi [prawn paste], ikan [fish], kaviar [caviar],
            PVT scores, as well as correlations between age, educational   cumi [squid]) are displayed. The examinee is then asked to
            level, and overall cognitive function.             identify and name three words that appeared on the first
                                                               page (i.e., udang [shrimp], ikan [fish], and cumi [squid]).
            2. Materials and methods                           The test administrator provides feedback by stating the
            2.1. Materials                                     number of correct responses. All stimuli are presented in
                                                               Bahasa Indonesia. Based on the original ASTM manual,
                                                                                                            28
            2.1.1. NV-MSVT (Green, 2008)                       the cut-off for determining invalid performance is a score
            The NV-MSVT is a computerized PVT that uses colored   below 85. However, in a previous simulation study,  we
                                                                                                         22
            images as stimuli. Several scores are obtained from this test:   suggested increasing the cut-off score to below 89.
            immediate recognition (IR), delayed recognition (DR),
            consistency (CNS), DR variations (DRV), DR archetypes   2.1.3. RDS, LDF-1, and LDF-2
            (DRA), paired associates (PA), and free recall (FR). More   The  RDS,  LDF-1,  and  LDF-2  are  embedded  validity
            detailed information on these scores is provided in the test   measures derived from the Digit Span (DS). This study
            manual. 26                                         used the DS from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-
                                                                                            29
              The NV-MSVT manual  classifies  “pass” or “fail”   Fourth  Edition-Indonesian  version.   Although  the  RDS
                                   26
            scores based on the examinee’s performance on the “easy”   was initially developed for the WAIS-R, its diagnostic
            subtests first, which are reflected in Criterion A (composed   ability has been established and found comparable to later
                                                                                 30
            of Criteria A1 and A2). Criterion A1 is met if the mean   versions of the WAIS.  The RDS is the most commonly
                                                                                                            31
            of IR, DR, CNS, DRA, DRV, and PA is ≤90. Criterion A2   used embedded PVT in neuropsychological assessment.
            is met if the mean of DR, CNS, DRA, and DRV is ≤88.    The RDS score is calculated by summing the raw scores for
                                                         26
            In addition to these original cut-off scores, our previous   the longest forward and backward DSs with no errors in
                                                                        32
            simulation study  suggested lowering Criteria A1 and A2   both trials.  The LDF-1 is the longest span in the forward
                         22
            to ≤87 and ≤81, respectively, to maintain a specificity of   condition in which at least one trial of a given pair is
            0.90. If an examinee fails either Criterion A1 or Criterion   repeated correctly, and the LDF-2 is the longest span in
            A2, the patient’s performance on Criterion B (composed of   the forward condition in which both trials are repeated
                                                                      33
            Criteria B1, B2, and B3) should be examined to determine   correctly.  The original cut-off scores for the RDS, LDF-
            whether the failure is due to invalid performance or severe   1, and LDF-2 were ≤6, ≤4, and ≤3, respectively. 33,34  In a
                                                                                    22
            cognitive impairment. This approach is also known as   previous simulation study,  an increased cut-off score for
                                                         26
            the “genuine memory impairment profile” approach.    the RDS of ≤7 was recommended, while the cut-off scores
            Criterion B1 is met if PA - (DR + CNS + DRA + DRV)/4   for LDF-1 and LDF-2 remained unchanged.
            is >−11. Criterion B2 is met if (IR + DR + CNS)/3 - (PA   2.2. Participants
            + FR)/2 is <20. Finally, Criterion B3 is met if the IR,
            DR, CNS, DRA, and DRV standard deviations are ≥12.   Our study was prospective in design. Eligible participants
            Failure on at least two of these criteria indicates invalid   were adults (≥18 years) with neurological disorders. A total
            performance.  We calculated Criteria A and B for all   of 141 participants were recruited for this study, and they
                       26
            participants according to the formulas outlined above.  were divided into three groups: those with a neurocognitive
                                                               disorder due to possible neurodegenerative disease (ND)
            2.1.2. TMJPI                                       (n  = 50), patients with a history of stroke (PS;  n  = 42),
            The TMJPI is a standalone, paper-and-pencil PVT    and a mixed-etiology group (n = 47). The mixed-etiology
            constructed based on the Amsterdam Short-Term Memory   group consisted of individuals diagnosed with epilepsy
            (ASTM) test. 27,28  The TMJPI test booklet consists of two   (n  = 20), TBI (n  = 7), brain tumor (n  = 6), Parkinson’s
            training items and 30 test items. Each item consists of three   disease  (n  =  5),  multiple  sclerosis  (MS;  n  =  4),  cerebral
            pages. On the first page, the examinee is presented with   small vessel disease (CSVD; n = 2), neuropathy (n = 2),
            five  stimulus  words  from  a  common  semantic  category,   and chronic migraine (n = 1). Participants with Parkinson’s
            such as seafood (e.g.,  ikan  [fish],  cumi  [squid],  kerang   disease were included in the mixed-etiology group, as they
            [oyster], kepiting [crab], udang [shrimp]). The examinee is   constituted a small subgroup, and their cognitive status was
            asked to read these words aloud and memorize them. On   likely better than that of the ND patients (e.g., Parkinson’s
            the next page, a distractor is shown in the form of a simple   disease participants were able to provide consent, while
            addition or subtraction task (e.g., 5 + 2 =  ?), which must   ND  participants were  not). Group  classifications  were
            be solved. On the third page, the five words from the same   based on the primary diagnosis made by the neurologist,


            Volume 4 Issue 2 (2025)                         88                               doi: 10.36922/an.5661
   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99