Page 49 - ARNM-1-1
P. 49

Advances in Radiotherapy
            & Nuclear Medicine                                                CCRT plus nimotuzumab for cervical cancer



               radiotherapy  in  patients  with  locoregionally  advanced   Duodenal and other gastrointestinal toxicity in cervical and
               nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Onco Targets Ther, 8: 3383–3390.   endometrial cancer treated with extended-field intensity
                                                                  modulated radiation therapy to paraaortic lymph nodes. Int
               https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S93238
                                                                  J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 85: 1262–1268.
            23.  You B, Brade A, Magalhaes JM, et al., 2011, A dose-escalation      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.10.004
               phase I trial of nimotuzumab, an antibody against the
               epidermal growth factor receptor, in patients with advanced   30.  Lee J, Lin JB, Chang CL,  et al., 2017, Prophylactic lower
               solid malignancies. Invest New Drugs, 29: 996–1003.   para-aortic  irradiation  using  intensity-modulated
                                                                  radiotherapy mitigates the risk of para-aortic recurrence
               https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-010-9444-0
                                                                  in locally advanced cervical cancer: A 10-year institutional
            24.  Crombet T, Osorio M, Cruz T,  et al., 2004, Use of the   experience. Gynecol Oncol, 146: 20–26.
               humanized  anti-epidermal growth  factor receptor      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.04.016
               monoclonal  antibody  h-R3  in  combination  with
               radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced head and   31.  Choi S, Hsu ICJ, 2018, Cervial cancer. In: Hansen EK, Roach
               neck cancer patients. J Clin Oncol, 22: 1646–1654.   M, (eds). Handbook of Evidence-Based Radiation Oncology.
                                                                  3 ed. New York: Springer International Publishing, p623–
                                                                   rd
               https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2004.03.089            644.
            25.  Hasselle MD, Rose BS, Kochanski JD, et al., 2011, Clinical   32.  Wang W, Zhang F, Hu K, et al., 2018, Image-guided, intensity-
               outcomes of intensity-modulated pelvic radiation therapy   modulated radiation therapy in definitive radiotherapy
               for carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 80:   for 1433 patients with cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol, 151:
               1436–1445.                                         444–448.
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.04.041       https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.09.024
            26.  Yu C, Zhu W, Ji Y,  et al., 2015, A comparative study of   33.  Pötter R, Georg P, Dimopoulos JCA, et al., 2011, Clinical
               intensity-modulated radiotherapy and standard radiation   outcome of protocol based image (MRI) guided adaptive
               field with concurrent chemotherapy for local advanced   brachytherapy combined with 3D conformal radiotherapy
               cervical cancer. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol, 36: 278–282.  with or without chemotherapy in patients with locally
            27.  Gandhi AK, Sharma DN, Rath GK,  et al., 2013, Early   advanced cervical cancer. Radiother Oncol, 100: 116–123.
               clinical outcomes and toxicity of intensity modulated versus      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2011.07.012
               conventional pelvic radiation therapy for locally advanced
               cervix carcinoma: A prospective randomized study.  Int J   34.  Yoon HI, Cha J, Keum KC, et al., 2015, Treatment outcomes
               Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 87: 542–548.               of extended-field radiation therapy and the effect of
                                                                  concurrent chemotherapy on uterine cervical cancer with
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.06.2059      para-aortic lymph node metastasis. Radiat Oncol, 10: 18.
            28.  Erpolat OP, Alco G, Caglar HB, et al., 2014, Comparison      https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-014-0320-5
               of hematologic toxicity between 3DCRT and IMRT
               planning in cervical cancer patients after concurrent   35.  Ng BH,  Rozita A, Adlinda A,  et al., 2015,  Extended  field
                                                                  radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy in patients
               chemoradiotherapy: A national multi-center study.  Eur J   with cervical cancer and positive para-aortic lymph nodes:
               Gynaecol Oncol, 35: 62–66.
                                                                  A single institution retrospective review. Asian Pac J Cancer
               https://doi.org/10.12892/ejgo23912014              Prev, 16: 3827–3833.
            29.  Poorvu PD, Sadow CA, Townamchai K,  et al., 2013,      https://doi.org/10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.9.3827























            Volume 1 Issue 1 (2023)                         8                       https://doi.org/10.36922/arnm.0408
   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54