Page 56 - ARNM-1-1

Advances in Radiotherapy
& Nuclear Medicine Barcode system for immobilization device

Conflict of interest radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 34: 213–219.

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(95)02094-2
4. Bissonnette JP, Medlam G, 2010, Trend analysis of radiation
Author contributions therapy incidents over seven years. Radiother Oncol,

Conceptualization: Satoko Saotome, Fumiyasu 96: 139–144.
Matsubayashi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2010.05.002
Formal analysis: Satoko Saotome 5. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, 2000, To Err is
Investigation: Satoko Saotome Human Building a Safer Health System, Committee on
Methodology: Satoko Saotome, Minoru Yoshioka, Takeo Quality of Health Care in America. Washington, D.C.:
Hashimoto Institute of Medicine National Academy Press, p49–68.
Writing – original draft: Satoko Saotome 6. Terezakis SA, Harris KM, Ford E, et al., 2013, An evaluation
Writing – review & editing: Yasushi Ito, Masahiko Oguchi, of departmental radiation oncology incident reports:
Yasuo Yoshioka Anticipating a national reporting system. Int J Radiat Oncol
Biol Phys, 85: 919–923.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.09.013
This study was approved by the institutional review board
of our institution (IRB no. 2015 – 1025). 7. Yamamoto T, Oka K, 2019, A human factors study using
VTA for incident cases in radiotherapy. Nihon Hoshasen
Consent for publication Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi, 75: 1249–1259.
https://doi.org/10.6009/jjrt.2019_JSRT_75.11.1249
Not applicable.
8. Ihaka R, Gentleman R, 1996, R: A language for data analysis
Availability of data and graphics. J Comput Graph Stat, 5: 299–314.

Supporting data can be obtained from the corresponding https://doi.org/10.2307/1390807
author following formal request. 9. R Core Team, 2017, R: A Language and Environment for
Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for
Further disclosure Statistical Computing. Available from: https://www.r-project.org
The entire set of findings has been presented in the 68 Kanto 10. Scott-Brown M, Miah A, Harrington K, et al., 2010,
th
Conference Japanese Society of Radiological Technology. Evidence-based review: Quality of life following head and
neck intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol,
References 97: 249–557.

1. Radiation Therapy Subcommittee, 2015, Practice of https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2010.08.004
Immobilization and Verification for External Beam 11. Suzuki J, Takeoka K, Shima K, et al., 2012, Uncertainty in
Radiation Therapy. Japan: Japanese Society of Radiological patient set-up margin analysis in radiation therapy. J Radiat
Technology, p97–143 [Article in Japanese].
Res, 53: 615–619.
2. Fiorino C, Reni M, Bolognesi, et al., 1998, Set-up error in https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrs003
supine-positioned patients immobilized with two different
modalities during conformal radiotherapy of prostate 12. Duteau J, 2014, Blood specimen labelling errors: Implications
cancer. Radiother Oncol, 49: 133–141. for nephrology nursing practice. CANNT J, 24: 25–28.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-8140(98)00127-3 13. Najafpour Z, Hasoumi M, Behzadi F, et al., 2017, Preventing
blood transfusion failures: FMEA, an effective assessment
3. Song PY, Washington M, Vaida F, et al., 1996, A comparison
of four patient immobilization devices in the treatment of method. BMC Health Serv Res, 17: 453.
prostate cancer patients with three dimensional conformal https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2380-3

Volume 1 Issue 1 (2023) 7 https://doi.org/10.36922/arnm.1036