Page 61 - BH-2-1
P. 61

Brain & Heart                                         Impact of ketogenic diet in adults with drug-resistant epilepsy




















            Figure 3. The comparison of the change of neuropsychological scale scores between responders and non-responders to modified Atkins diet treatment. An
            independent t-test was performed to compare the change in neuropsychological scale scores between non-responders and responders.
            Abbreviation: AVLT: Auditory verbal learning test.


















            Figure 4. The impact of modified Atkins diet treatment (MAD) on interictal epileptic discharge (IED) index in patients as-treated. A paired t-test or paired
            Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to analyze the difference in the IED index before and after MAD treatment. *P<0.05; ns: not significant.
            Abbreviations: NREM1: Non-rapid eye movement 1; NREM2: Non-rapid eye movement 2.

            Table 3. Correlation between electroencephalography   with drug-resistant epilepsy. We analyzed the impact of
            characteristics and clinical efficacy of modified Atkins diet   cognitive function using objective neuropsychological
            in patients as‑treated (N=8)                       scales and investigated EEG characteristics and the IED
                                                               index to identify predictive factors.
                             Responders  Non‑responders  P‑value*
                               (N=3)      (N=5)                  A considerable body of data has accumulated regarding
            Discharge pattern                        0.625     the efficacy of KD in both children and adults. A meta-
             Focal discharge   3 (100%)   4 (80%)              analysis of 12 studies reported a combined efficacy rate of
             Generalized discharge  0 (0%)  1 (20%)            42% for CKD in adults with intractable epilepsy, and the
                                                                                     18
            Distribution of ED                       0.643     efficacy rate of MAD is 34%.  Another meta-analysis of six
                                                               randomized  controlled trials indicated that  MAD,  when
             Frontal region    0 (0%)     2 (40%)              combined with standard ASM therapy, was associated
             Central region    0 (0%)     1 (20%)              with a higher rate of 50% or greater seizure reduction in
             Temporal region   3 (100%)   2 (40%)              frequency than standard ASM therapy alone.  Consistent
                                                                                                   19
            Slowing of the PDR  1 (33%)   2 (40%)    0.714     with other studies, 20,21  the efficacy observed in our study
            Focal slow wave    1 (33%)    3 (60%)    0.500     was 37.5%. However, 62.5% of patients as-treated did
            GPT                0 (0%)     3 (60%)    0.196     not benefit from MAD treatment, and one patient even
            GPFA               0 (0%)     2 (40%)    0.464     experienced worsening seizures. A  meta-analysis of 16
                                                               observational studies revealed a seizure reduction rate
            Prolonged ED       1 (33%)    3 (60%)    0.500     below 50%, ranging from 12% to 67%,  and the proportion
                                                                                             22
            Notes: Categorical variables are presented as percentages. *P-value was   of seizure worsening was not specified. The mechanisms
            calculated using Fisher’s exact test for categorical data.  underlying seizure deterioration remain unclear. Previous
            Abbreviations: ED: Epileptic discharges; GPFA: Generalized
            paroxysmal fast activity; GPT: Generalized polyspike train;   studies suggested several potential causes: (i) The
            PDR: Posterior dominant rhythm.                    resistance to KD, where KD may change EEG patterns by

            Volume 2 Issue 1 (2024)                         6                         https://doi.org/10.36922/bh.1978
   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66