Page 77 - BH-2-1
P. 77

Brain & Heart                                                        Lutembacher’s percutaneous treatment




                         A                                   B













                                         C













            Figure 3. (A) Continuous Doppler tracing across MV post-BMV; (B) Peak RV systolic pressure post-procedure as estimated from the peak of TR
            velocity jet; (C) ASD device in situ at 3 months of follow-up.
            Abbreviations: ASD: Atrial septal defect; BMV: Balloon mitral valvuloplasty; MV: Mitral valve; RV: Right ventricle; TR: Tricuspid regurgitation.

            technique,  and retrograde balloon insertion through   apparent ease of performing BMV and ASD device closure
                    13
            the arterial approach.  We employed the modified Inoue   in contemporary practice should not overshadow the
                             14
            technique to achieve an optimal BMV result by leveraging   unique challenges faced when combining these procedures
            our available hardware and the previous experience in   in a patient with LS. Thorough pre-procedure planning,
            treating such cases.                               an in-depth understanding of the various balloon
                                                               manipulation techniques to cross the MV, and precise sizing
              In the presence of good TTE images and ASD sizes
            <20  mm in diameter, we usually avoid trans-esophageal   of the device for ASD closure are paramount. Neglecting
            imaging during ASD closure, as was done in this case. As   these considerations may lead to potential catastrophes
                                         6
            previously suggested by Bagga et al.,  we usually oversize   due to the underestimation of procedure difficulty.
            the ASD occluder by at least 4 mm (instead of the routinely   Acknowledgments
            used 2  mm) in LS as the LA pressure is higher with
            co-existing MS and predisposes to device embolization.  None.
              The above case report, along with the previous   Funding
            publications, suggests that  definitive percutaneous
            treatment in carefully selected LS cases is safe and effective,   None.
            thereby reducing mortality and morbidity risks associated   Conflict of interest
            with cardiac surgery. Percutaneous treatment also
            decreases the physiologic trauma due to the thoracotomy   The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
            scar and the length of hospital stay.  At the same time, the
                                        15
            unique hemodynamic and anatomic aspects of co-existing   Author contributions
            MS and ASD should be given due consideration while   Conceptualization: Abhimanyu Uppal, Rambabu Sharma
            planning definitive percutaneous intervention for these   Investigation: Gyarsi L. Sharma, Ashok Garg
            cases.                                             Writing – original draft: Abhimanyu Uppal
                                                               Writing – review & drafting: Rambabu Sharma, Ashok Garg
            4. Conclusion
                                                               Ethics approval and consent to participate
            The adage “one plus one perhaps does not equal two”
            applies  to  the  percutaneous  management  of  LS.  The   Not applicable.


            Volume 2 Issue 1 (2024)                         4                         https://doi.org/10.36922/bh.1701
   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82