Page 66 - BH-2-2
P. 66

Brain & Heart                                                  The relationship between LE8 score and ASCVD



            specifically on the initial day of the study. The Healthy   diagnoses of any myocardial infarction, angina pectoris,
            Eating  Index-2015  (HEI-2015),  serving  as  a  metric  for   congestive heart failure, stroke, or CHD were reported.
            diet quality, was computed with a scale ranging from
            0 to 100, where elevated scores signify improved diet   2.5. Covariates
            quality.  The HEI-2015 scores were utilized as a surrogate   During home interviews, demographic characteristics,
                  13
            for  evaluating  healthy  dietary  patterns,  derived  from  a   such as age, ethnicity, highest level of education, self-
            1 -day 24-h dietary recall. HEI-2015 scores, constituting   reported sex, race, marital status, and annual household
             st
            a 13-component index, spanned from 0 to 100, with   income, were collected. Participants were categorized
            elevated scores reflecting greater adherence to a healthy   into four age groups: 20 – 39 (young adulthood), 31 – 50
            diet. The components comprised various dietary elements,   (middle age), 51-65, or ≥66  years (older age). Race and
            including total fruit, whole fruit, grains, total vegetables,   ethnicity information, as reported by the participants,
            beans, dairy, whole grains, plant protein, total protein   followed NHANES protocols and included categories, such
            foods, seafood, fatty acids, refined grains, sodium, and   as NH Asian, NH black, NH white, Mexican American,
            empty  calories. Participants were  stratified based  on   or multiracial groups. Family income level was assessed
            their HEI-2015 score: ≤50 for poor health, 51 – 80 for   using a monthly poverty level index, where participants
            intermediate health, and >80 for ideal health.  Certain   reported the total family income for the previous month
                                                  14
            variables necessary for calculating these components   in dollars. This variable indicated the ratio of reported
            were directly sourced from the Food Patterns Equivalents   monthly income to the poverty threshold. Household
            Database (FPED) and NHANES totals files. The FPED   poverty status was established by comparing monthly
            and NHANES Total Nutrient Intake datasets provided   family income to poverty thresholds set by the Department
            the following components directly used in computing   of Health and Human Services and is classified into very
            HEI-2015: data on total fruit, whole grains, dairy, refined   low income (<1.0), low income (1.01 – 2.0), low middle
            grains, and added sugars, as well as sodium and saturated   income (2.01 – 3.0), middle income (3.01 – 4.0), and high
            sats (Table S2).
                                                               income (>4.0).
              Physical activity was assessed through a 3-day scale,
            transforming activity duration into weekly  minutes  of   2.6. Statistical analysis
            moderate-  or higher-intensity physical activity. Sleep   Descriptive statistics were utilized to summarize the
            health was evaluated by self-reported usual sleep duration.   frequency  distributions,  employing  corresponding
            Tobacco  use,  aligned  with  the  AHA’s  nicotine  exposure   weighted proportions and stratified by ASCVD and non-
            definition, included inquiries about current/former/non-  ASCVD status. The statistical analyses followed NHANES
            cigarette-smoker status and cohabitation with regular   analysis and reporting standards, incorporating sample
            cigarette smokers (Table S1). 15                   weights, stratification, and clustering considerations
                                                               as stipulated. Continuous variables were expressed as
            2.3.2. Health factors assessment
                                                               mean (95% confidence interval [CI]), while categorical
            Health factors underwent assessment following NHANES   variables were delineated as counts (percentages). Baseline
            protocols. BMI (kg/m²) was calculated by dividing   characteristics between the two groups based on CVH were
            the weight (kg) by the  square of the  standing height   compared using a t-test for continuous variables and a χ
                                                                                                             2
            (m ). Systolic and diastolic blood pressure values were   test for categorical variables, respectively. The relationship
              2
            determined  as  the  mean  of  all  available  measurements   between LE8 and ASCVD was assessed using multivariate
            at the baseline assessment. Enzymatic methods were   linear regression. All statistical analyses were performed
            employed to measure serum cholesterol, while non-high-  using Stata SE, version 18, and a two-sided p-value of <0.05
            density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol was determined by   was deemed statistically significant.
            subtracting HDL cholesterol from the total cholesterol
            value.  Glycated  hemoglobin  levels  were  measured  using   3. Results
            high-performance  liquid  chromatography  methods.
            Comprehensive  details  regarding  each  CVH  metric,   3.1. Characterization of the sample
            including the scoring algorithm, are available in the   The study population consisted of 5042 individuals,
            supplementary file and in previous studies. 15     representing a total of 102,388,285 individuals, with
                                                               and without ASCVD. Within the ASCVD subgroup, the
            2.4. Main outcome measure                          average age was 66.1 years (95% confidence interval [CI]:
            The assessment of ASCVD prevalence involved participants   65.44 – 66.90), while in the non-ASCVD subgroups,
            completing a self-administered questionnaire, where the   it was 32.40  years (95% CI: 32.0 – 32.80), with females


            Volume 2 Issue 2 (2024)                         3                                doi: 10.36922/bh.2915
   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71