Page 82 - DP-2-1
P. 82

Design+                                                                    Evaluating a building code app



            Author contributions                               7.   Eshrati P, Mokaberian A. Studying the current status of
                                                                  teaching national building codes in bachelor of architectural
            Conceptualization: Hebatalla Nazmy                    engineering and providing solutions to strengthen it. J Fine
            Formal analysis: All authors                          Arts Arch Urban Plan. 2022;27(2):73-82.
            Investigation: Hebatalla Nazmy                        doi: 10.22059/jfaup.2022.324279.672632
            Methodology: Hebatalla Nazmy
            Writing – original draft: All authors              8.   Dunham  BD.  Assessment of the Status of Model Building
            Writing – review & editing: Hebatalla Nazmy           Codes in Interior Design Curricula. United States: Texas Tech
                                                                  University; 1998.
            Ethics approval and consent to participate         9.   Homer BD, Plass JL, Blake L. The effects of video on
            This study was approved by the Oklahoma State University   cognitive load and social presence in multimedia-learning.
            Institutional Review Board (IRB) under the application   Comput Human Behav. 2008;24(3):786-797.
            number IRB-22-30. The IRB granted approval on January      doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2007.02.009
            24, 2022, and processed the  application as expedited.   10.  Kirschner PA, Park B, Malone S, Jarodzka H. Toward a
            Human subjects were involved in this study, and written   cognitive  theory  of  multimedia  assessment  (CTMMA).
            consent was obtained from all participants, ensuring their   In:  Learning, Design, and Technology: An International
            informed participation.                               Compendium  of Theory,  Research,  Practice, and  Policy.
                                                                  Berlin, Germany: Springer Nature; 2023. p. 153-175.
            Consent for publication
                                                                  doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-17461-7_53
            Human subjects were involved in this study, and written   11.  Zhampeissova K, Gura A, Vanina E, Egorova E. Academic
            consent was obtained from all participants, ensuring their   performance and cognitive load in mobile learning.  Int J
            informed participation and permission was obtained from   Interact Mobile Technol. 2020;14:78-91.
            each of the subjects to publish their data and/or images.
                                                                  doi: 10.3991/ijim.v14i21.18439
            Availability of data                               12.  Jiang D, Renandya WA, Zhang LJ. Evaluating ELT
                                                                  multimedia courseware from the perspective of cognitive
            Not applicable.
                                                                  theory of multimedia learning. Comput Assist Lang Learn.
            References                                            2017;30(7):726-744.
                                                                  doi: 10.1080/09588221.2017.1359187
            1.   Ching FD, Winkel SR. Building Codes Illustrated: A Guide to
               Understanding the 2021 International Building Code. United   13.  Tabbers HK, Martens RL, Van Merriënboer JJ. Multimedia
               States: John Wiley and Sons; 2021.                 instructions and cognitive load theory: Effects of modality
            2.   Harmon SK, Kennon KE. The Codes Guidebook for Interiors.   and cueing. Br J Educ Psychol. 2004;74(1):71-81.
               United States: John Wiley and Sons; 2006.          doi: 10.1348/000709904322848824
            3.   Federal Emergency Management Agency.  Building  Codes   14.  Sweller J. Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and
               Save:  A  National Study. Federal Emergency Management   instructional design. Learn Instr. 1994;4(4):295-312.
               Agency; 2020. Available from: https://www.fema.gov/sites/
               default/files/2020-11/fema_building-codes-save_study.pdf      doi: 10.1016/0959-4752(94)90003-5
               [Last accessed on 2024 Aug 01].                 15.  Van Merriënboer JJ, Ayres P. Research on cognitive load
                                                                  theory  and  its  design  implications  for  e-learning.  Educ
            4.   Bedigian L. How Building Codes Inform Architectural Design.   Technol Res Dev. 2005;53(3):5-13.
               Building Safety Journal; 2023. Available from: https://www.
               iccsafe.org/building-safety-journal/bsj-dives/how-building-     doi: 10.1007/BF02504793
               codes-inform-architectural-design/# [Last accessed on 2024   16.  Plotnick E.  Concept Mapping: A  Graphical System for
               Aug 01].
                                                                  Understanding the Relationship between Concepts. Syracuse,
            5.   Ismail AS, Ali KN, Iahad NA. A  Review on BIM-based   NY: Education Resources Information Center; 1997.
               Automated  Code  Compliance  Checking System.  In:  2017   17.  Yousoof M, Sapiyan M, Kamaluddin K. Reducing cognitive
               International Conference on Research and Innovation in   load in learning computer programming. Int J Comput Inf
               Information Systems (ICRIIS). IEEE; 2017. p. 1-6.
                                                                  Eng. 2007;1(12):4100-4103.
               doi: 10.1109/ICRIIS.2017.8002486
                                                               18.  Bruillard E, Baron GL. Computer-based Concept Mapping:
            6.   Solonsky RL. Advancing Critical Building Code Education   A Review of a Cognitive Tool for Students. In: Proceedings
               through Modularized Lectures. In:  2018  ASEE  Annual   of Conference on Educational Uses of Information and
               Conference and Exposition. Utah; 2018.             Communication Technologies. Beijing: House of Electronics


            Volume 2 Issue 1 (2025)                         14                               doi: 10.36922/dp.4730
   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87