Page 92 - DP-2-2
P. 92

Design+                                                      Closed-form solution for pressurized obround shells



            stresses  based on  the tangential  forces  (Equations  I  and   Radial stress was in tension through most of the
            II) and bending moments (Equations XX and XXI) of   thickness of section C but in compression across the entire
            sections.                                          thickness of section D (Figure 6). Radial stress in the shell
              The hoop stress distribution was nonlinear in section C   was much smaller than hoop stress.
            and approximately linear in section D.               As sections C and D were located far from section B, the
              As there are no geometry and load boundary       proposed expressions of stress distribution were expected
            condition discontinuities from segments C to D, hoop   to be accurate.
            stress distribution on the section was expected to change   Figures  7 and  8 show the hoop and radial stress
            smoothly. When the section moved from section C to   distributions at section B across the thickness from both
            section D, the hoop stress distribution on the section would   sides of section B, (σ )   and (σ ) . The averaged curve
                                                                                θ θ=π/2
                                                                                          x x=L
            turn counterclockwise from the curve (σ )  in Figure 5 to   demonstrated in  Figure  7 was obtained by taking the
                                            θ θ=0
            curve (σ ) , and from significant nonlinear to linear. The   average of the results from Equations XXII and XXV.
                   x x=0
            tensile hoop stress should move from C  to D .       At the junction, the calculated stresses from the curved
                                           i
                                                o
              The ASME Code uses membrane plus bending stress as   beam and straight beam were inconsistent because only
            the design stress. The curves in Figure 5 show that using   consistency of displacement and rotation angle at the
            membrane plus bending stress as hoop stress may lead to
            an underestimation. In this case, the hoop stress was 27%
            higher than the membrane plus bending stress.


















                                                               Figure  7. Hoop stress, (σ ) θ=π/2  (green dashed line) and (σ x ) x=L  (blue
                                                                                θ
                                                               dashed line) sec. B
            Figure 5. Hoop stress, (σ ) θ=0  (green line) and (σ x ) x=0  (blue line), sec. C
                            θ
            Abbreviation: FEA: Finite element analysis.




















                                                               Figure  8. Radial stress, (σ r ) θ=π/2  (green dashed line) and (σ y ) x=L  (blue
            Figure 6. Radial stress, (σ r ) θ=0  (green line) and (σ y ) x=0  (blue line), sec. C  dashed line), sec. B
            Abbreviation: FEA: Finite element analysis.        Abbreviation: v y : Displacement of straight segment.


            Volume 2 Issue 2 (2025)                         8                            doi: 10.36922/DP025060010
   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97