Page 67 - DP-2-3

Design+ Design chatbot using activity theory

Insurance Business; 2021. Available from: http://hdl.handle. 32. Kaptelinin V. Creating computer-based work environments:
net/10125/70679 [Last accessed on 2025 Jul 05]. An empirical study of Macintosh users. In: Proceedings of
the 1996 ACM SIGCPR/SIGMIS Conference on Computer
19. Feine J, Morana S, Gnewuch U. Measuring Service Encounter
Satisfaction with Customer Service Chatbots using Sentiment Personnel Research. New York: ACM; 1996. p. 360-366.
Analysis; 2019. Available from: https://aisel.aisnet.org/ 33. McMichael H. An Activity Based Perspective for Information
wi2019/track10/papers/2/ [Last accessed on 2025 Jul 05]. Systems Research. In: 10 Amsterdam Conference on
th
Information Systems; 1999.
20. Rese A, Ganster L, Baier D. Chatbots in retailers’ customer
communication: How to measure their acceptance? J Retail 34. Cameron G, Cameron D, Megaw G, et al. Back to the Future:
Consum Serv. 2020;56:102176. Lessons from Knowledge Engineering Methodologies
for Chatbot Design and Development. In: British HCI
doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102176
Conference 2018. BCS Learning and Development Ltd; 2018.
21. Aditya EW, Ismail S, Allias N. Implementation of intelligent
chatbot in student portal: A systematic literature review. In: 35. Weber I. Low-code from frontend to backend: Connecting
2022 International Visualization, Informatics and Technology conversational user interfaces to backend services via a low-
rd
Conference (IVIT). United States: IEEE; 2022. p. 47-51. code IoT platform. In: Proceedings of the 3 Conference on
Conversational User Interfaces. New York: ACM; 2021. p. 1-5.
22. Norman DA, Draper SW. User Centered System Design: New
Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction. New Jersey: L. 36. Wan S. Developing an engati-based library chatbot to improve
Erlbaum Associates Inc.; 1986. reference services. In: Innovation and Experiential Learning in
Academic Libraries: Meeting the Needs of Twenty-First Century
23. Engeström Y. An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Students. Urban: University of Alberta; 2022. p. 189.
Developmental Research. New Delhi: Orienta-Konsultit; 1987.
37. Engeström Y, Miettinen R, Punamäki-Gitai RL, editors.
24. Kuutti K. Activity theory as a potential framework for Perspectives on Activity Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge
human-computer interaction research. In: Context and University Press; 1999.
Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer
Interaction. United States: MIT Press; 1996. 38. Kaptelinin V, Nardi BA, Macaulay C. Methods & tools: The
activity checklist: A tool for representing the “space” of
25. Bødker S. Activity theory as a challenge to systems design. context. Interactions. 1999;6(4):27-39.
In: Proceedings of the IFIP TC. Berlin: Springer; 1991.
doi: 10.1145/306412.306431
26. Bødker S, Grønbæk K. Cooperative prototyping: Users
and designers in mutual activity. Int J Man Mach Stud. 39. Kaenampornpan M, O’Neill E, Ay BB. An Integrated Context
1991;34(3):453-478. Model: Bringing Activity to Context. In: Proceedings of
Workshop; 2004.
doi: 10.1016/0020-7373(91)90030-B
40. Radziwill NM, Benton MC. Evaluating Quality of Chatbots
27. Engeström Y. Developmental studies of work as a test bench of and Intelligent Conversational Agents. arXiv; 2017. Available
activity theory: The case of primary care medical practice. In: from: https://www.//arxiv.org/abs/1704.04579 [Last
Understanding Practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context. accessed on 2025 Jul 05].
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993. p. 64-103.
41. Cooper A, Reimann R, Cronin D, Noessel C. About Face:
28. Jonassen DH, Rohrer-Murphy L. Activity theory as The Essentials of Interaction Design. United States: John
a framework for designing constructivist learning Wiley and Sons; 2014.
environments. Educ Technol Res Dev. 1999;47(1):61-79.
42. Munday P. Duolingo: Gamified learning through translation.
doi: 10.1007/BF02299477 J Span Lang Teach. 2017;4(2):194-198.
29. Bødker S. Computers in mediated human activity. Mind doi: 10.1080/23247797.2017.1396071
Cult Act. 1997;4(3):149-158.
43. Compare Aivo and Engati on Revoyant. See Side-by-Side
doi: 10.1207/s15327884mca0403_2 Comparisons of Features, Pricing, and Customer Reviews.
30. Bernard RG, Enyedy ND. Activity centred design: Towards Available from: https://www.revoyant.com/compare/aivo-
a theoretical framework for CSCL. In: Paper Presented at vs-engati [Last accessed on 2025 Jul 05].
the Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 44. Kofod-Petersen A, Cassens J. Using activity theory to model
Conference. United States: University of California at context awareness. In: International Workshop on Modeling
Berkeley; 1999. p. 12-15. and Retrieval of Context. Berlin: Springer; 2005. p. 1-17.
31. Engeström Y, Brown K, Engeström R, Koistinen K. 45. Engeström Y. Learning by Expanding: An Activity-
Organizational Forgetting: An Activity-Theoretical Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research.
Perspective. London: Sage Publications Inc.; 1990 Cambridge University Press; 2014.

Volume 2 Issue 3 (2025) 17 doi: 10.36922/DP025060009