Page 95 - EER-2-1
P. 95

Explora: Environment
            and Resource                                                                    Artificial neural networks



            often face a trade-off between computational speed and   cycle life, are incorporated into the model, which is trained
            accuracy. 14,15  Low-level lifetime models, while fast to set   using extensive experimental data collected under various
            up and execute, often rely on mathematical equations with   operating conditions. The electrothermal component
            many coefficients and may struggle to capture intricate   employs a second-order Thévenin equivalent circuit
            electrochemical degradation mechanisms. 16-19  Conversely,   model (ECM), enhanced by advanced characterization and
            high-fidelity models offer detailed analysis but are time-  parameterization procedures.
            consuming in both model setup and simulation. 20-23  Validation of the coupled model demonstrates its

              To bridge this gap, there is a growing need for   effectiveness in estimating both electrical and thermal
            medium-fidelity  lifetime  models  that  balance  accuracy   performance across different stages of the cell’s lifespan.
            and computational efficiency. Data-driven methodologies,   The results revealed remarkable accuracy, with a maximum
            particularly artificial neural networks (ANNs), have   error of just 2% in voltage readings and 3% in temperature
            demonstrated promise in significantly improving    predictions during discharge. This comprehensive
            modeling accuracy while maintaining reasonable     modeling approach not only enhanced our understanding
            computational demands. 24-26  ANNs have demonstrated   of the long-term dynamics of Sony 3 Ah cells but also
            high accuracy in various battery estimation tasks. 27-31    served as a computationally efficient tool for battery
                        32
            Severson  et al.  demonstrated the potential of machine   management systems and control strategies.
            learning in predicting battery life cycles, achieving high
            accuracy  using  early-cycle  data.  Building  on  this,  Attia   2. Methods
            et al.  developed a closed-loop optimization system that   2.1. Battery feature
                33
            combined  machine  learning  with  Bayesian  optimization
            to optimize fast-charging protocols for LiBs efficiently.   The batteries tested were cylindrical Sony 18650-type
            In the realm of electrothermal modeling, Dai  et al.    lithium-ion cells (LiBs) with a capacity of 3 Ah (Sony,
                                                         34
            proposed a coupled electrothermal-mechanical model that   China).  These  cells  feature  a Li(NiMnCo)₁/₃O₂  cathode
            provided insights into the multi-physics behavior of LiBs.   and a graphite anode (G), with an average mass recorded at
            Their work highlighted the importance of considering   46.6 g. Their nominal capacity and voltage were 3 Ah and
            multiple physical domains in battery modeling. Similarly,   3.7 V, respectively. In this paper, the C-rate (C) is defined
            Guo et al.  developed a multiscale model that integrated   as 1C = 3 A.
                    35
            electrochemical, thermal, and aging effects, offering   A  Neware  CT-4008  system  (Neware,  China)  was
            a comprehensive approach to battery performance    employed to cycle the batteries, offering a voltage range
            prediction. The integration of data-driven methods with   of 25 mV – 5 V and a current range of 0.5  mA – 6 A.
            physics-based models has also gained traction. Wu et al.    This system was computer-controlled, and the charging/
                                                         36
            combined a physics-based model with machine learning to   discharging current was set based on the manufacturer’s
            improve the accuracy of state-of-health estimation. Their   specifications.  To monitor the temperature of the batteries,
                                                                          38
            hybrid approach demonstrated superior performance   a type-K thermocouple was affixed to the cells. Figure 1
            compared to  traditional methods.  In  a related study,  Li   illustrates the experimental setup for characterization.
            et al.  utilized a deep learning framework to enhance the
                37
            prediction of remaining battery lifespan, incorporating   2.2. Electrothermal characterization
            both static and dynamic features of battery degradation.   To parameterize the electrothermal model, several
            Despite these advancements, the specific combination of   characterization tests were conducted: (i) capacity test;
            semi-empirical electrothermal modeling with ANN-based   (ii) hybrid pulse power capability (HPPC); 39,40  (iii) open-
            lifetime estimation for 18650-type cells remains relatively   circuit voltage (OCV) (please send out + upload in GD)
            unexplored.                                        test; 41,42   (iv)  thermal  pulse  test; 43,44   and  high-current
                                                                  45
              Therefore,  this  study  presents  a  comprehensive   test.  These tests were derived from international battery
            electrothermal and lifetime model for Sony 3 ampere-  standards 46,47  and were conducted at various temperatures,
            hours (Ah) 18650 nickel manganese cobalt lithium-ion   with a rest period of 3 – 4 h used to precondition the cells
            cells, leveraging ANNs to predict the lifespan of these cells   to the desired temperature (−10, 10, 25, 35, 45, or 60°C).
            effectively. The proposed model integrates an electrothermal   The capacity test involves performing full charge and
            component with an ANN-based lifetime prediction    discharge cycles at varying discharge C-rates (C/5, C/4,
            approach, providing a holistic representation of cell   C/3, C/2, 1C, and 2C) and temperatures (−10, 10, 25, 35,
            behavior throughout its operational life. Key parameters,   45, and 60°C) to capture the data needed for modeling
            such as state of charge (SoC), temperature, current, and   battery capacity. During the test, the charging C-rate was


            Volume 2 Issue 1 (2025)                         2                                doi: 10.36922/eer.7228
   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100