Page 97 - EER-2-1
P. 97

Explora: Environment
            and Resource                                                                    Artificial neural networks




            Table 1. Number of samples per characterization test
            Test                                                 Number of samples at different temperatures
                                                     −10 and 10°C             25 and 35°C           45 and 60°C
            Capacity                                      3                       3                     3
            HPPC
            OCV
            Thermal pulse
            Electrical and thermal model validation
            High-current                                                        3
            Abbreviations: HPPC: Hybrid pulse power capability; OCV: Open-circuit voltage.
            Table 2. Lifetime testing matrix

            Condition   Number of samples  Temperature (°C)    C‑rate         Rest time (min)  Depth of discharge (%)
                                                         Discharge   Charge
            I                 3               25             1        0.5          60               100
            II                3               25             1        0.5          15               100
            III               3               25             1         4           60               100
            IV                3               25             4        0.5          60               100
            V                 3               45             1        0.5          60               100
            VI                3               25                         Dynamic profile for validation
            VII               3               10             1        0.5          60               100


            the impact of the charging rate, the charging current was   approach for dynamic systems, making them suitable for
            increased from 0.5C (3 A) to 4C (12 A), while other factors   modeling battery degradation. FNNs excel in predicting a
            remained unchanged.                                single output, such as capacity degradation, which aligns
              Moreover, a dynamic discharging profile, instead of a   with the requirements of this study. Therefore, a FNN
            constant one, was applied to validate the lifetime model.   architecture was employed to build the lifetime model.
            Finally, the end-of-life of the cell was fixed at 60% of the   Figure 3 illustrates a typical two-layer FNN configuration,
            initial capacity.                                  with the corresponding mathematical expressions
                                                               presented below: 48
            2.4. Electrothermal model development
                                                                          ij (∑
                                                                i (∑
                                                                                       v
            A comprehensive battery model was developed by     y =σ     L l=1 ω σ  L j=1 v x + ) + w i ) i =12,, …, m  (I)
                                                                                        lj
                                                                                   lj
                                                                                     j
                                                                                             0
            integrating and validating specialized sub-models into a
            unified modeling framework. This framework incorporates   where V and W represent the weight matrices, while
            electrical, thermal, and lifetime models  (Figure  2). The   v  and  w  denote the firing thresholds. The function
                                                                       j0
                                                                i0
            entire model was created using the MATLAB/Simulink®   σ(.) serves as the mapping function. The inputs to the
            2024 platform. The electrothermal component simulates   network are the n signals x , x ..., x , and the outputs are
                                                                                            n
                                                                                     1
                                                                                        2
            both the electrical and thermal behaviors of the battery   y ,  y ...,  y . After initializing the network’s weights and
                                                                  2
                                                                       m
                                                                1
            cell, capturing key parameters, such as voltage, SoC, and   biases, it is ready for training. Within this framework,
            temperature. Meanwhile, the aging model is designed   the FNN was trained using three input parameters:
            to estimate the degradation of the cell over time and to   temperature, current, and cycle number, alongside the
            update the cell’s capacity and IR using results from both   lifetime characterization data (Section 3.2). The network
            the electrical and thermal models.                 utilized 10 hidden neurons, and the dataset was divided
                                                               accordingly, with 75% used for training and 25% for
            2.5. Lifetime model development                    validation and testing. All these processes—training,
            ANNs have demonstrated high accuracy in battery    validation, and testing—were conducted in the MATLAB/
            estimation tasks. 27-31  Among these, feed-forward neural   Simulink® 2024 environment to ensure compatibility with
            networks (FNNs) stand out as a particularly effective   the electrothermal model.
            Volume 2 Issue 1 (2025)                         4                                doi: 10.36922/eer.7228
   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102