Page 101 - EER-2-2
P. 101

Explora: Environment
            and Resource                                               Assessing ecosystems by land cover and landscapes



            croplands and natural N-W classes. For ecosystem   IOER, Dresden, Germany, with a service contract effective
            accounting, accurately identifying the location and area of   from June 1, 2024, according to Section 631 and the
            croplands is critical, as their expansion is one of the main   following sections of the German Civil Code.
            threats to natural ecosystems. According to ARMSTAT
            regional statistics, data are available for arable land   Conflict of interest
            (including all lands intended for plowing, even if not used   The authors declare they have no competing interests.
            annually) and annually plowed areas. The land cover data
            aligns better with the first indicator, exceeding arable area   Author contributions
            by 18% and 23%, according to ESRI and ESA, respectively.   Conceptualization: Elena Bukvareva
            However, in different provinces, the discrepancies between   Formal analysis: Maxim Dubinin, Eduard Kazakov, Elena
            land cover data and statistics range from −62% to 70%. 41  Bukvareva
              In this study, we tested the ESRI and ESA land cover   Investigation:  Maxim  Dubinin,  Eduard  Kazakov,  Elena
            datasets, which, in the preliminary assessment, showed   Bukvareva
            relatively smaller discrepancies with ARMSTAT statistics   Methodology: Elena Bukvareva, Maxim Dubinin, Eduard
            on agricultural areas.  However, discrepancies between   Kazakov
                              41
            land cover data and official statistics remain significant.  Project administration: Armen Grigoryan
                                                               Writing-original draft: All authors
              Open harmonized statistics on agricultural and forest   Writing-review & editing: All authors
            areas at smaller administrative units than provinces, as
            well as within the boundaries of agricultural and forestry   Ethics approval and consent to participate
            enterprises can help refine land cover data across different
            classes. For an adequate interpretation of the inaccuracy of   Not applicable.
            some classes in land cover, a graduated scale of threshold   Consent for publication
            reliability in the analysis of relative changes in the extent of
            ecosystems may be helpful. 23                      Not applicable.
            5. Conclusion                                      Availability of data

            The  tested  approach of  intersecting  a map of  landscape   Digital maps and statistical tables are available on the BCC-
            zones with land cover data to create maps of LLCCs   Armenia website under the section “Ecosystem Extent”
            offers a valuable tool for ecosystem accounting. It takes   https://biodiversity-armenia.am/en/extent
            into account the landscape and geographical specificity
            of terrestrial ecosystems, tracking changes in their area if   References
            land cover data are updated. LLCCs serve as proxies for   1.   IPBES. In: Brondizio ES, Settele J, Díaz S, Ngo HT, editors.
            ecosystems, and the resulting LLCC map can be considered   IGlobal Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem
            a prototype ecosystem map for ecosystem accounting.   Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on
                                                                  Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. IPBES Secretariat; 2019.
              However, the LLCC-based approach faces a significant
            challenge, particularly in evaluating rare LLCCs that may be      doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3831673
            classification errors, which could be due to the low accuracy   2.   Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Global
            of land cover data. Alternative mapping methods are   Biodiversity Outlook 5. Montreal; 2020. Available from:
            required to assess rare and unique ecosystems. Nevertheless,   https://www.cbd.int/gbo5 [Last accessed on 2024 Jun 04].
            the LLCC-based approach provides additional information   3.   Visconti P, Elias V, Sousa Pinto I,  et al. Chapter  3:
            compared to landscape extent data and enables the     Status, trends  and  future dynamics of biodiversity and
            assessment of the extent and changes in relatively common   ecosystems underpinning nature’s contributions to people.
            ecosystem types, which are less affected by land cover errors.  In: Rounsevell M, Fischer M, Torre-Marin Rando A,
                                                                  Mader A, editors. The IPBES Regional Assessment Report on
            Acknowledgments                                       Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services for Europe and Central
                                                                  Asia. Secretariat of the IPBES; 2018. p. 187-382. Available
            None.                                                 from: https://zenodo.org/records/3237429 [Last accessed on
                                                                  2024 Jun 04].
            Funding
                                                               4.   Arneth А, Shin YJ, Leadley P, et al. Post-2020 biodiversity
            Funding allocation from the Federal Environment Agency   targets need to embrace climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci
            (UBA), Germany. The principal organization is the Leibniz   U S A. 2020;117(49):30882-30891.


            Volume 2 Issue 2 (2025)                         11                               doi: 10.36922/eer.4996
   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106