Page 97 - EER-2-2
P. 97

Explora: Environment
            and Resource                                               Assessing ecosystems by land cover and landscapes




                         A                                              B

















            Figure 5. Assessment of landscape-land cover class rarity according to the Environmental Systems Research Institute 2023 data. (A) Ranking landscape-
            land cover class (LLCC) types by their area. LLCCs occupying no more than 5% of the zone’s area are marked with a “●” symbol. (B) The map of LLCCs
            rarity. Colors correspond to those in the diagram.
            Abbreviations: N-W: Non-woody; W: Woody.

            dry steppe LLCCs. Although these LLCCs formally cover   province (Shirak) remain consistent. The positions of other
            a large area, natural vegetation occupies only a small area   provinces vary within the rankings. Syunik is significantly
            due to significant anthropogenic transformation. The most   ahead of other provinces, as it contains many rare LLCCs
            widespread LLCCs are located in the central part of the   and retains a large share of their area in Armenia. In
            country.                                           contrast, Shirak province has the smallest area of rare

              The  pattern  of  distribution  of  N-W  LLCCs  across   LLCCs  (Figure  7).  Notably, according  to  ESA data,  the
            provinces generally mirrors the distribution of landscape   total share of LLCCs in Syunik is 1.5 times larger than that
            zones, while the distribution of woody LLCCs in some   calculated using ESRI data.
            provinces  differs significantly.  Syunik  and Vayots  Dzor   When using the indicator of the total share of landscape
            contain  a  larger  proportion  of  woody  LLCCs  than   and LLCC areas within each province, the rankings are
            expected based on landscape distribution. In contrast,   largely influenced by the rarest LLCCs, which may be errors
            Shirak, Gegharkunik, and Aragatsotn have a smaller area   in the land cover datasets. For example, Syunik province
            of woody LLCCs. 45                                 ranks exceptionally high based on ESA data because almost
                                                               all pixels of three rare LLCCs (woody areas in high-altitude
            3.3. Assessment of the role of administrative      snowy and  alpine zones  and sub-mountain semi-desert)
            provinces in preserving landscape-land covers class   are concentrated there. This pattern is not observed in ESRI
            diversity in Armenia                               data (Figure 7B). Conversely, Gegharkunik province ranks
            To assess the importance of provinces for conserving   second in the ESRI-based ranking because almost all woody
            natural  landscapes  and  LLCCs  in  Armenia, we  used  an   pixels in the high-altitude snowy zone are concentrated
            indicator based on the total share of landscape and LLCC   there (Figure 7A). These discrepancies suggest that ultra-rare
            areas located within each province. Unlike the LLCC rarity   LLCCs may represent land cover interpretation errors. If the
            ranking  (Figure  5),  which  considers  the  share  of LLCC   rarest LLCCs, occupying no more than 5% of the landscape
            areas relative to their total area in Armenia, this approach   zone’s area (marked with a “●” symbol in  Figure  5), are
            calculated the share of landscape and LLCC areas within   excluded from the calculations, the province rankings based
            each province relative to their total area in Armenia.   on ESRI and ESA data become more similar. However,
            This method was adopted to ensure that the value of rare   some provinces  with  similar indicators occupy different
            landscapes and LLCCs is not diminished.            positions in the middle of the list (Figure 7C and D). Despite
                                                               this alignment, these rankings differ from the provincial
              The rankings of provincial importance for conserving   rankings for landscapes (Figure 6).
            natural landscapes based on ESRI and ESA data are very
            similar, differing only in the positions of certain provinces   3.4. Changes in landscapes and LLCCs extents and
            with similar values in the middle of the list (Figure 6).  their provincial conservation importance in Armenia
              Based on the rankings of provincial importance for   Land cover changes recorded by ESRI data from 2017
            conserving LLCCs derived from the ESRI and ESA data,   to  2023  have  resulted  in  changes  in  the  area  of  natural
            only the first-ranked province (Syunik) and the last-ranked   landscapes and LLCCs (Figure  8). The data on LLCC


            Volume 2 Issue 2 (2025)                         7                                doi: 10.36922/eer.4996
   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102