Page 107 - EER-2-3
P. 107

Explora: Environment
            and Resource                                                                     Enzymatic degradation



            from a total of over 450 million tons produced annually   then further metabolize these units into end products,
            worldwide. 11,12  This increase in production is mainly due   such as CO , H O, CH , and N . Ehrhardt and Rothenberg
                                                                                                            35
                                                                        2
                                                                           2
                                                                                4
                                                                                      2
            to the manufacturing of single-use disposable plastics,   noted that green hydrogen is also a realizable outcome.
            which make up around 50% of all plastic products. The   The by-products of microbial plastic degradation offer
            significant increase in plastic waste disposal, which   significant potential for addressing plastic pollution by
            consists of materials that do not easily break down   repurposing these products in other applications, thereby
            and thus remain in the environment, has resulted in   creating  a  recycling  loop  for  these  harmful  materials
               13
            land  and ocean pollution. 14,15  Due to their practical   that are otherwise difficult to eliminate and contribute
            physicochemical qualities (e.g., crystallinity, molecular   to environmental pollution. Municipal and public waste
            weight, hydrophobicity, and additive composition), some   management is currently the biggest environmental issue
            polymers, such as low-density PE (LDPE), are utilized in a   affecting emerging countries, especially Nigeria, 36-39  where
            variety of applications.  At present, PE is derived from thin   some  cities  are  stench-filled  with  tons  of  uncontrollable
                              16
            polyolefin plastic sheets and films utilized in the packaging   solid and plastic waste. 40-44  As a result of Nigeria’s current
            of products. Furthermore, plastic bags constitute 60% of   economic state, LDPE sachets are commonly used for
            the total plastic production, which includes LDPE, and are   packaging water, popularly known as “pure water.”  These
                                                                                                       45
            considered the most common form of solid waste.  LDPE   pure water sachets (PWS) represent the most affordable
                                                    17
            is characterized by good strength, chemical resistance,   packaging option.  While the use of LDPE has gained
                                                                              46
            flexibility,  and  transparency.  Its  hydrophobic  nature   widespread acceptance across various communities, it has
                                              18
            prevents microorganisms from accessing it.  The resistance   unfortunately resulted in the rise of a solid waste stream, as
            of LDPE to microbial degradation is largely due to its high   LDPE degrades at an extremely slow rate.
            molecular weight, which limits enzyme accessibility, and   This study was initiated to investigate how Lip and
            the absence of functional groups, which prevents effective   laccase (Lac) enzymes impact the degradation rate of
            microbial attachment or breakdown.  In addition, its low   LDPE wastes (specifically PWS). While several studies
                                         19
            surface  energy  further  hinders  microbial  colonization   have explored LDPE degradation using microbial enzymes,
            by reducing surface wettability and interaction with   most have focused on either enzyme concentration or
            enzymes.  LDPE is characteristically inert, and its rate   polymer structure in isolation. For instance, Liu  et al.
                   20
                                                                                                            47
            of degradation is extremely slow, taking several decades,   examined LDPE  degradation using  Yarrowia lipolytica,
            which causes it to remain in nature for an extended period.   but without optimizing for both enzyme load and particle
            Due to its complicated 3D structure and large molecular   size simultaneously. Mazaheri and Nazeri  reported the
                                                                                                 48
            weight, it is recalcitrant to degradation.  Despite being   effectiveness of Stenotrophomonas spp. and Alcaligenaceae
                                             21
            widely used for managing LDPE waste, incineration and   in degrading LDPE, demonstrating microbial potential,
            landfilling methods are  linked  to several environmental   though their work did not incorporate enzymatic
            drawbacks. Thus, biodegradation has been demonstrated   concentration gradients or particle size variations as
            to be the optimal choice for managing plastic waste. 22  interactive variables. Khandare  et  al.  used marine
                                                                                                49
              Since it is virtually impossible to eliminate their   bacteria for LDPE biodegradation and highlighted
            manufacture, there is growing interest in developing more   particle preparation and treatment time, but lacked an
            effective and rapid methods for reducing the accumulation   integrative assessment of enzyme-specific parameters,
            of these widely used yet environmentally harmful plastic   such as those studied with Aspergillus flavus enzymes in
                                                                                     50
            items. 23,24  It is highly likely that scientists, who are constantly   this research. DSouza et al.  worked with an Aspergillus
            engaged in researching and developing biologically safe   consortium to degrade LDPE under controlled conditions,
            methods, will identify a solution to address the rapid   yet did not combine enzyme concentration and plastic
            accumulation of plastic waste. Researchers have identified   size optimization, a gap this study aims to bridge using a
            particular  microorganisms  that  can  generate  enzymes   bifunctional Lip-Lac system. The novelty of the study is
            capable of decomposing these polymers. 25-28  Enzymes that   that it is the first to simultaneously optimize both enzyme
            degrade the carbon backbone of polymers are classified   concentration and plastic particle size to maximize
            under  the  hydrolase  family,  including  esterases,   lipases   LDPE degradation using enzymes from  A. flavus. The
                                                   29
            (Lips),  depolymerases,  and PETases.  Buchholz et al.    study supports Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 12
                               31
                 30
                                                         33
                                           32
            enumerated and  discussed enzymes  that  require  water   (Responsible Consumption and Production) and SDG
            to function. These enzymes can break down the plastic   13 (Climate Action). By utilizing microbial enzymes
            polymer into simpler monomeric units that are easily   from  A. flavus (a naturally occurring fungus) for the
            decomposable within the environment and can serve as a   degradation of LDPE plastic waste, our study promotes
            carbon source for microorganisms.  The microorganisms   the development of green technologies aligned with the
                                        34
            Volume 2 Issue 3 (2025)                         2                           doi: 10.36922/EER025220042
   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112