Page 121 - EJMO-9-3
P. 121

Eurasian Journal of
            Medicine and Oncology                                     Zercepac  + pyrotinib versus pertuzumab in HER2+ BC
                                                                             ®


            2.4. Safety assessment                             3.3. Multivariate predictors of pCR

            Adverse events were evaluated according to the World   Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that
            Health Organization Toxicity Grading Scale. The following   both age and TNM stage independently influenced the
            parameters were assessed:                          likelihood of achieving tpCR:
            (i)  Laboratory parameters: Complete blood count,   (i)  Patients aged >50 years had 3.82 times higher odds
               hepatic/renal function, and electrolyte profiles.  of achieving tpCR compared to those aged ≤50 years
            (ii)  Cardiac monitoring: Electrocardiogram (ECG) and   (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.104 – 13.225,
               echocardiogram (performed quarterly).              p=0.034).
            (iii) Clinical symptoms: Alopecia, nausea/vomiting,   (ii)  Conversely, patients with advanced-stage (cTNM
               diarrhea, abdominal pain, and arthralgia.          IIb – IIIc) showed a 91.2% reduction in the odds of
                                                                  achieving tpCR compared to those with stage IIa
            Notably,  no  significant  LVEF  decline  (>10%)  or  cardiac   disease (odds ratio [OR] = 0.088, 95% CI: 0.023 –
            dysfunction was observed. Cardiac events were defined as:  0.338, p<0.001) (Table 3).
            (i)  ST-T segment abnormalities.
            (ii)  Clockwise/counterclockwise rotation on ECG.  3.4. Univariate predictors of pCR
            (iii) Premature atrial/ventricular contractions.   Univariate analysis based on post-operative pathological
            (iv)  Sinus arrhythmia.                            assessment identified five significant predictors of tpCR
            (v)  Conduction block.                             achievement:
            (vi) Low QRS voltage.                              (i)  Advanced age (>50 years).
            (vii) Left axis deviation.                         (ii)  Clinical nodal involvement (cN ≥1).
            (viii)  Left ventricular hypertrophy.              (iii) Advanced TNM stage (IIb – IIIc).
            2.5. Statistical analysis                          (iv)  Hormone receptor-negative status.
                                                               (v)  Non-use of dual-target therapy.
            Data were analyzed using SPSS 26.0 (IBM Corp.,
            United States). Categorical variables were compared   Detailed comparisons between tpCR and non-tpCR
            using  the  chi-square  test  or  Fisher’s  exact test.  Binary   groups are presented in Table 4.
            logistic regression was used to identify independent   3.5. Adverse events
            clinicopathological predictors of neoadjuvant therapy
            efficacy. A  two-tailed  p-value <0.05 was considered   Treatment-related adverse events occurred in over 40% of
            statistically significant.                         patients, with the most frequent being alopecia (91.7%),
                                                               followed by nausea (48.4%), diarrhea (41.9%), and fatigue
            3. Results                                         (35.5%). Cardiovascular events, though generally mild,
                                                               included arrhythmias (19.4%), T-wave abnormalities
            3.1. Baseline clinicopathological characteristics
                                                               (12.9%), and transient LVEF fluctuations (a >10% change
            The study cohort comprised 62  patients with HER2-  in 6.5% of cases). Notably, no symptomatic heart failure or
            positive breast cancer, classified into the following   grade ≥3 cardiac events were observed (Table 5).
            histopathological subtypes:
            (i)  Invasive ductal carcinoma: 45 cases (72.6%).  3.6. Comparative analysis of TCbHP versus TCbHPy
            (ii)  Invasive carcinoma with intraductal component:   regimens
               11 cases (17.7%).                               3.6.1. Efficacy outcomes
            (iii) Invasive carcinoma with ductal carcinoma in situ: Five   No statistically significant differences were observed between
               cases (8.1%).
            (iv)  Invasive carcinoma with mucinous features: One case   the TCbHP and TCbHPy regimens (Table 6) in terms of:
                                                               (i)  tpCR rate (55.2% versus 37.5%, p=0.25).
               (1.6%).
                                                               (ii)  Magnitude of Ki-67 index reduction (p=0.67).
              Detailed baseline characteristics are presented in   (iii) Miller–Payne pathological regression grading (p=0.07).
            Table 1.
                                                               3.6.2. Safety profile
            3.2. Predictors of pCR
                                                               While both regimens demonstrated comparable toxicity
            Univariate logistic regression analysis identified age,   profiles  (Table  6),  the  incidence  of  diarrhea  differed
            tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, and hormone     markedly:
            receptor (HR) status as independent predictors of total   (i)  TCbHPy group: 100% (8/8).
            pCR (tpCR) (Table 2).                              (ii)  TCbHP group: 3.4% (1/29) (p<0.001).


            Volume 9 Issue 3 (2025)                        113                         doi: 10.36922/EJMO025100044
   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126