Page 125 - EJMO-9-3
P. 125

Eurasian Journal of
            Medicine and Oncology                                     Zercepac  + pyrotinib versus pertuzumab in HER2+ BC
                                                                             ®



            Table 5. Treatment‑related adverse events by regimen
            Regimen                            TCbH (n=16)   TCbHP (n=29)  TCbHPy (n=8)  THP (n=9)  χ   2  p
            Adverse cardiac events (n [%])
             ST-segment changes                 3 (18.75%)     1 (3.45%)    1 (12.50%)   0 (0%)    4.30  0.23
             Clockwise or counterclockwise rotation  2 (12.50%)  3 (10.34%)  0 (0%)      0 (0%)    2.12  0.55
             Premature atrial/ventricular contractions  1 (6.25%)  2 (25.00%)  0 (0%)   2 (22.22%)  8.14  0.04
             Sinus arrhythmia a                 2 (12.50%)    5 (17.24%)     0 (0%)      0 (0%)    3.21  0.36
             Conduction block                   3 (18.75%)      0 (0%)       0 (0%)      0 (0%)    9.06  0.03
             Low QRS voltage                     1 (6.25%)     1 (3.45%)     0 (0%)      0 (0%)    1.04  0.79
             Left axis deviation                  0 (0%)        0 (0%)      1 (12.50%)  1 (11.11%)  5.50  0.14
             Left ventricular hypertrophy       2 (12.50%)     1 (3.45%)     0 (0%)      0 (0%)    3.03  0.39
            Adverse reactions (n [%])
             Alopecia                           15 (93.75%)   25 (86.21%)   8 (100%)     9 (100%)  2.85  0.42
             Nausea                             5 (31.25%)    17 (58.62%)   3 (37.50%)  5 (55.56%)  3.66  0.30
             Diarrhea                             0 (0%)       1 (3.45%)    8 (100%)    1 (11.11%)  48.29  < 0.001
             Abdominal pain                      1 (6.25%)    4 (13.80%)     0 (0%)      0 (0%)    2.85  0.42
             Low white blood cell count          1 (6.25%)    5 (17.24%)    2 (25.00%)   0 (0%)    3.49  0.32
             Low hemoglobin                     5 (31.25%)     2 (6.90%)     0 (0%)      0 (0%)    9.09  0.03
             Low platelet count                 3 (18.75%)    5 (17.24%)     0 (0%)      0 (0%)    3.49  0.32
             Abnormal liver function            3 (18.75%)    9 (31.03%)    1 (12.50%)  1 (11.11%)  2.46  0.48
             Arthralgia                         2 (12.50%)    3 (10.34%)     0 (0%)     1 (11.11%)  1.04  0.79
             Anemia                             2 (12.50%)    14 (48.28%)   3 (37.50%)  3 (33.33%)  5.80  0.12
            Notes:  Sinus arrhythmia refers to irregular heart rhythm or tachycardia. Data are presented as n (%). Statistical method: Chi-square test.
                 a
            Abbreviations: TCbH: Docetaxel + carboplatin + trastuzumab; TCbHP: Docetaxel + carboplatin + trastuzumab + pertuzumab; TCbHPy: Docetaxel +
            carboplatin +trastuzumab + pyrotinib; THP: Docetaxel + trastuzumab + pertuzumab.

            ongoing. As early as 2020, Xuhong et al.  conducted a phase   response to adverse reactions such as diarrhea, thus affecting
                                          17
            II clinical trial involving 19 patients, reporting a tpCR rate   treatment efficacy. In a study involving 267 patients with
            of 73.7% for Py combined with the EC-TH (epirubicin/  advanced HER2-positive breast cancer, the PHOEBE
                                                                                                            20
            cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel/trastuzumab)   trial confirmed that the median progression-free survival
            regimen in the neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive   (PFS) was significantly longer in the Py group compared
            locally advanced breast cancer. The main adverse reactions   to the lapatinib group (median PFS: 12.5 months versus
            were diarrhea and leukopenia. Mao  et al.  found that   6.8 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.39, p<0.001). The ORR
                                               18
            among 97  patients treated with Py-based neoadjuvant   was also higher in the Py group than in the lapatinib group
            therapy, the tpCR rate was 48.5%. The incidence of grade 3   (67.2% versus 51.5%, p=0.016), with the median duration
            or higher adverse reactions was 35.1%, with diarrhea being   of the response being 11.1  months versus 7.0  months,
            the most common, occurring in 63.9% of patients. A real-  respectively. Subgroup analysis revealed that among
            world study by Fu et al.  reported a tpCR rate of 44.7%   patients with brain metastases, PFS remained significantly
                                19
            in the trastuzumab + Py group. The lower rate compared   prolonged in the Py group (HR = 0.32). In addition, the
            to the first prospective cohort study, and its similarity to   Phase II PERMEATE  study, which targeted patients with
                                                                                21
            the retrospective cohort study, may be attributed to dose   asymptomatic brain metastases, confirmed that Py could
            reductions or treatment discontinuation caused by grade 3   effectively cross the blood–brain barrier, achieving an ORR
            or higher adverse reactions. The study further confirmed   of 74.6% and improving the prognosis of patients with
            that there was a statistically significant difference in tpCR   brain metastases from HER2-positive breast cancer.
            rates based on Py dose reductions and the occurrence of
            grade 3 or higher adverse reactions in the trastuzumab + Py   In our study, the tpCR rate for the trastuzumab + Py
            group. In addition, patient compliance was lower in real-  group combined with six cycles of TCb chemotherapy was
            world settings than in strictly controlled clinical studies;   37.5% (3/8), which was lower than the rates reported in
            some  patients  reduced  or discontinued medication  in   the aforementioned prospective and real-world studies.


            Volume 9 Issue 3 (2025)                        117                         doi: 10.36922/EJMO025100044
   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130