Page 99 - ESAM-1-1
P. 99

Engineering Science in
            Additive Manufacturing                                               Mechanical property of metal-based IPC



            for its excellent mechanical properties, was selected as   and 75 MPa, respectively.  The model was discretized
                                                                                     37
            the matrix material for the truss lattices. Following the   using 4-node linear tetrahedron elements (C3D4),
            completion of printing, the as-printed metal specimens   with mesh sizes of 0.3  mm for the truss microlattices
            underwent post-processing procedures, including the   and 0.5  mm for the epoxy resin after considering mesh
            removal of residual powder, stress relief treatment,   convergence. General contact conditions were applied,
            ultrasonic cleaning, and drying in a convection oven.  assigning dynamic and static friction coefficients of 0.2 and
                                                               0.15, respectively.
            2.2.2. Epoxy infiltration

            The IPC specimens for each structure were fabricated   2.3.3. Evaluation indicators
            through a vacuum  epoxy infiltration method, as shown   To quantitatively evaluate the compressive performance
            in  Figure  1B. The epoxy resin was prepared by mixing   of the metamaterials, total energy absorption (TEA),
            EPOLAM 2040 resin with the hardener at a weight ratio   SEA, and compressive strength were introduced as key
            of 100:39. The SLM-fabricated metal lattice specimens   performance indicators. TEA represents the total energy
            were then placed in custom-designed molds, which were   absorbed during deformation, whereas SEA normalizes
            subsequently filled with thoroughly mixed epoxy resin.   this  value  by  the  specimen  mass.  Energy  absorption
            To eliminate trapped air and ensure complete infiltration,   efficiency (EAE) is introduced to identify the densification
            the molds underwent a vacuum treatment at −0.1 MPa   point. Beyond the final EAE peak, the structure exhibits
            for 30 min. This process was repeated 3 times. Then, the   significant hardening. Compressive strength refers to the
            molds were placed in an oven for thermal curing at 80°C   maximum stress that the metamaterials can sustain before
            for 30 min, allowing the epoxy resin to solidify properly.   failure. The mathematical definitions of these evaluation
            After curing, excess resin was removed, and the specimens   indicators are summarized as follow:
            were carefully cut and polished to achieve the final IPC    d
            metamaterials.                                        TEA  0  F xdx()                        (I)
            2.3. Evaluation methods                              SEA = TEA/m,                              (II)
            2.3.1. Mechanical testing                            EAE = TEA/F (x),                         (III)
            Quasi-static compression tests were performed using   Where d and F(x) represent the compression distance
            the Shimadzu AG25-TB testing machine (Shimadzu     and instantaneous load during the quasi-static tests, and m
            Corporation, Japan). The specimens were positioned   denotes the specimen mass.
            between two rigid  plates,  with  the upper  plate applying
            downward compression at a strain rate of 0.001/s until the   3. Results and discussion
            structure fully collapsed, according to ISO 13314:2011.    3.1. Compressive response
                                                         39
            Three independent repeat experiments were conducted for
            each specimen to ensure the consistency and reliability of   Figure 2 illustrates the mechanical response and indicators
            the statistical results. The compressive load-displacement   for various metamaterials.  Figure  2A-C present the
            data were recorded throughout the testing process, while   engineering stress-strain relationships and von Mises
            the  deformation  behavior  was  captured  using  a  digital   stress distribution patterns of the truss metamaterials
            camera. The data were presented with standard deviations   (FCC, FCCR, and FCCH).
            at the 95% confidence interval.                      All three truss microlattices exhibit a layer-by-layer
                                                               catastrophic collapse behavior with fractures primarily
            2.3.2. Finiment element analysis method            occurring at the node positions. Due to structural disorder
            To complement the experimental tests, finite element   caused by damage, the subsequent von Mises stress is
            analysis (FEA) was performed using Abaqus/CAE 2022   distributed predominantly near the fractured locations.
            (Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp., USA). The simulation   The FCCR unit cell demonstrates a more uniform
            setup replicated the experimental conditions by placing   stress distribution, indicating the positive role of ribs in
            the lattice metamaterials between two rigid plates. With   optimizing the load flow path. In contrast, the failure of
            the kinetic energy to internal energy ratio considered to be   diagonal struts results in the loss of connectivity between
            <5%, the loading velocity was set to 1 m/s to ensure quasi-  the inner small-scale geometry and the overall structure
            static  deformation  conditions.  Material  properties  for   in  the  FCCH  microlattice.  This  causes  excessive  stress
            Ti-6Al-4V and epoxy resin were assigned based on their   to concentrate on the thinner external struts, which are
            respective densities 4.42  g/cm³ and 1.18  g/cm³, Young’s   designed to maintain constant relative density, leading to
            moduli 110 GPa and 2 GPa, and yield strengths 880 MPa   premature structural collapse.


            Volume 1 Issue 1 (2025)                         4                              doi: 10.36922/esam.8554
   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104