Page 35 - GHES-1-2
P. 35

Global Health Econ Sustain                                               Fast-track drug approvals in Brazil



            conducting Phase III clinical studies is not feasible,   is 30  days, extendable for an  additional 30  days on
            acceptance may be granted if there is demonstrated high   justification.
            therapeutic  or preventive efficacy and  no comparable   For our study, in February 2023, we requested
            therapy or alternative drug exists for that disease (Brasil,   information regarding the quantity and the medications
            2017a). Resolução RDC n° 204, de 27 de Dezembro de   that were registered under the fast-track process (RDC
            2017. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (Anvisa).   204/2017 and RDC 205/2017) in Brazil from 2017 to 2022.
            However, for drugs approved based on Phase II studies
            or with Phase III studies still in progress, the company   2.2. Anvisa Medication Consultation Portal
            must submit a commitment letter pledging to present   The Anvisa Medication Consultation Portal provided
            the results of the studies to Anvisa. The final approval of   additional insights and data for this study. The portal offers
            drug registration will be contingent on the submission of   a monthly overview of the analysis queues, based on the
            these results (Brasil, 2017b). Resolução RDC n° 205, de   current rules applied to the historical document statuses.
            28 de Dezembro de 2017. Agência Nacional de Vigilância   The following information is presented within the panel:
            Sanitária (Anvisa).                                a.  Quantity of documents in the queue at the beginning
              Table 1 presents a comprehensive overview of the fast-  and the end of each month
            track process characteristics implemented by the primary   b.  Median time between document entry to and exit
            international regulatory agencies. Given the intricate   from the queue
            regulatory environment in the health-care market, our   c.  Quantity of documents that exited the queue within
            study aims to evaluate the implications of expedited   specific time intervals: Up to 90 days, between 90 and
            drug registration through Anvisa in Brazil. The primary   180 days, between 180 and 360 days, between 360 and
            objective of this investigation is to assess the impact of the   720 days, and over 720 days
            recent drug registration legislation in Brazil, by comparing   d.  Monthly balance between the number of documents
            the quantity of new drug registrations by Anvisa, both   entering the queue and the number exiting
            through regular and fast-track processes, spanning from   e.  Other related indicators
            2017 to 2022.                                        These indicators allow for the analysis of the current
            2. Methods                                         queue’s evolution, enabling the assessment of queue size,
                                                               trends in queue growth or reduction, and the median time
            The data collection for this study involved accessing and   documents spent in the queues. It is important to note that
            retrieving public registration data from Anvisa through two   this panel focuses on analyzing the queues based on the
            primary sources: the Transparency Portal and the Anvisa   current rules applied to the historical document statuses.
            Medication Consultation Portal (Line, 2021). The period   Therefore, the historical analysis of the queue may not
            of  data collection spanned from  2017  to 2022,  focusing   accurately represent the queue as it was presented on the
            specifically on medications registered by Anvisa through   Anvisa website, as the queue rules may have been different
            the  fast-track  process,  as  outlined  in  RDC  204/2017   in the past.
            (prioritization) and RDC 205/2017 (rare diseases).
                                                               2.3. Data analysis
            2.1. Transparency portal                           The parameters of interest for this study were focused on
            The Brazilian Transparency Portal, a comprehensive tool   medication registration, further divided into different types
            for accessing public administration information, was   of registration and those falling under the purview of RDC
            utilized to request data on medications registered by   204/2017 and RDC 205/2017. These specific subsets of
            Anvisa. To obtain the relevant information, the following   medication registration were chosen to assess the impact and
            steps were followed:                               efficiency of the fast-track process introduced by Anvisa. By
            a.  Visiting the Brazilian Transparency Portal website.  employing the Transparency Portal and the Anvisa Medication
            b.  Locating  the  section  dedicated  to  “Information   Consultation Portal, we were able to collect a comprehensive
               Request” or a similar option.                   dataset that provided insights into the registration process for
            c.  Completing the required form with detailed     medications, including the analysis duration and the volume
               specifications regarding the requested data.    of requests received and processed by Anvisa.
            d.  Submitting the information request electronically   For the analysis of the collected data, linear regression
               through the portal.                             was  chosen  as  the  statistical  method.  Linear  regression
            e.  The information request is processed by Anvisa   is a widely used technique in data analysis that allows for
               analysts, and they have a deadline for a response   the examination of the relationship between a dependent


            Volume 1 Issue 2 (2023)                         4                        https://doi.org/10.36922/ghes.0995
   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40