Page 146 - GHES-3-2
P. 146

Global Health Economics and
            Sustainability
                                                                             Vaccine hesitancy in the US, India, and China


            Pulse Survey (HPS). The estimation was carried out using   2.2. HPS data
            hesitancy responses as the dependent variable in the   The  data  for  this  study  was  collected  from  the  HPS
            multinomial and binary logistic regression models. In the   (Household Pulse Survey, n.d.), which spans the period
            multinomial logistic regression (MLR) model, the response   from July 21, 2021, to October 11, 2021. The HPS is
            variable had three categories: “Hesitant,” “Non-hesitant,”   designed for rapid deployment, collecting data to measure
            and “Unsure,” but the binomial logistic regression (BLR)   how emerging issues impact US households from social
            model had only two categories for the response variable,   and economic perspectives. This initiative is collaboration
            namely, “Hesitant” and “Not hesitant.” The purpose of this   between  the  Census  Bureau  and  the  National  Center
            study was to gain insight by comparing multinomial and   for Health Statistics (NCHS) focused on the effects of
            binomial logistic response probabilities. Further insight   COVID-19 in the US. Data collection started on April 23,
            into the response probabilities can be obtained by using   2020,  and  follows  a  2-week  on,  2-week  off  schedule  for
            recently developed penalized methods. In these methods,   collection and dissemination. The data are of good quality
            regression parameters are pulled toward zero based on the   and maintained by the US government agencies. This
            contribution of independent variables. Additional details   ongoing effort addresses various COVID-19-related issues,
            on the penalized methods are discussed under Model 4.
                                                               including long COVID, hospital data, and long-term care.
            2. Data description                                We chose the HPS dataset because it has several variables
                                                               that provide a measure of household experiences and the
            Here we analyzed  two cohorts: (i) The  Inter-University   social and economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.
            Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR)   The dataset’s large sample size across the US is particularly
            COVID-19 database that focuses on the global vaccine   valuable for studying COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. By
            hesitancy data; and (ii) HPS data that concentrates on   utilizing the HPS data and employing MLR analysis, we aim
            surveys of identified households in the USA. A detailed   to characterize the key aspects contributing to COVID-19
            overview of both datasets is addressed below:      vaccine hesitancy across different demographics and

            2.1. ICPSR data                                    regions in the US.
            The first dataset is extracted from the ICPSR COVID-19   The dataset contains 515,558 household samples from
            database (https://doi.org/10.3886/E130422V1)  (Zhang   weeks 34 to 39, with a total of 202 characteristics. Of
            et al., 2021). It is an open COVID-19 data repository where   these, 382,908 represent individual households. For the
            any researcher can deposit her/his dataset (s) following   analysis, we focused on those who had not received any
            the guidelines. The datasets are from around the world   vaccine, which comprised 43,859 samples (11.4%) and 202
            and cover different aspects of COVID-19. It is maintained   variables. After removing missing values, the population
            by the Institute of Social Research (ISR), University   was reduced to 5,758 samples and 202 factors. Households
            of Michigan. As of August 14, 2024, 104 datasets were   that responded to the “Question seen but category not
            deposited covering different aspects of COVID-19 from   selected” (−99) and “Missing/Did not report” (−88) were
            around the world. ICPSR is managed by ISR, University   not considered in the final analysis, resulting in a dataset of
            of Michigan, holds survey data from many organizations   5,758 unique participant households. Based on the existing
            of  the  US  government,  and  is  a  consortium  of  many   literature on vaccine hesitancy and an inspection of the
            universities. The data quality is excellent and available   datasets, we selected the following covariates to examine
            to researchers in the US and outside the US. The cross-  their relationship with vaccine hesitancy: Gender, region,
            sectional survey is conducted to assess the prevalence of   health insurance, income, MH service status, marital
            vaccine hesitancy in the US, India, and China, due to their   status, MH medicine prescribed, race, indicators of anxiety,
            large sample sizes. For India, there were 1,761 participants   interest in work, feeling down, worried, education, seeing,
            who completed the survey as of November 2020, of which   hearing, mobility, and memory. In addition, we defined two
            90.2%  indicated  acceptance  of  a  COVID-19  vaccine.   more variables: One for geographical regions (Northeast,
            In the US, 1,768 individuals participated in the survey   Mid-Atlantic, Southeast, Great Lakes, Midwest, Southwest,
            from August to November 2020. Of the individuals who   Northwest, West, and Mid-South) and another for political
            participated, 67.3% indicated that they would accept the   views (red, blue, or red/blue [mixed]) depending on the
            vaccine. A total of 1,129 of them either had a parent or a   election results from the past decade.
            child, of which 67.6% would accept the vaccine. In China,
            there were 1,727 participants, of which 1551 indicated that   3. Methods
            they would accept a vaccine. 90.1% of them who had either   Our investigation is motivated by the following research
            a parent or child were willing to accept a vaccine.  questions:


            Volume 3 Issue 2 (2025)                        138                       https://doi.org/10.36922/ghes.2958
   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151