Page 76 - GPD-1-2
P. 76
Gene & Protein in Disease Recent advances and challenges of network biology
Conflict of interest 10. Huttlin EL, Bruckner RJ, Paulo JA, et al., 2017, Architecture
of the human interactome defines protein communities and
The author declares no conflict of interest. disease networks. Nature, 545(7655): 505–509.
Author contributions https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22366
This is a single-authored paper. 11. Luck K, Kim DK, Lambourne L, et al., 2020, A reference
map of the human binary protein interactome. Nature,
Ethics approval and consent to participate 580(7803): 402–408.
Not applicable. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2188-x
12. Wan C, Borgeson B, Phanse S, et al., 2015, Panorama of
Consent for publication ancient metazoan macromolecular complexes. Nature,
525(7569): 339–344.
Not applicable.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14877
Availability of data 13. Wang P, Chen Y, Lü JH, et al., 2016, Graphical features of
Not applicable. functional genes in Human protein interaction network.
IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst, 10(3): 707–720.
References https://doi.org/10.1109/TBCAS.2015.2487299
1. Barabási AL, 2016, Network Science. Cambridge: Cambridge 14. Lee TI, Rinaldi N, Robert F, et al., 2002, Transcriptional
University Press. regulatory networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science,
https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.2010.5634435 298(55943): 799–804.
2. Chen GR, Wang HF, Li X. 2015, Introduction To Complex https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1075090
Networks: Models, Structures And Dynamics. 2 ed. 15. Bhler J, Marguerat S, 2013, Transcriptional Regulatory
nd
Beijing: Higher Education Press. Network. Berlin, New York: Springer.
3. Chen LN, Wang RS, Zhang XS, 2009, Biomolecular https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9863-7_737
Networks: Methods and Applications in Systems Biology.
Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons. 16. Guelzim N, Bottani S, Bourgine P, et al., 2002, Topological
and causal structure of the yeast transcriptional regulatory
https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470488065.ch5 network. Nat Genet, 31(1): 60–63.
4. Lü JH, Wang P, 2020, Modeling and Analysis of Bio- https://doi.org/10.1038/ng873
Molecular Networks. Singapore, Berlin: Springer.
17. Ravasz E, Somera AL, Mongru DA, et al., 2002, Hierarchical
5. Alon U, 2007, An Introduction to Systems Biology: Design organization of modularity in metabolic networks. Science,
Principles of Biological Circuits. London: Chapman and 297(5586): 1551–1555.
Hall, CRC.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1073374
6. Costanzo M, VanderSluis B, Koch EN, et al., 2016, A global
genetic interaction network maps a wiring diagram of 18. Pols T, Sikkema HR, Gaastra BF, et al., 2019, A synthetic
cellular function. Science, 353(6306): aaf1420. metabolic network for physicochemical homeostasis. Nat
Commun, 10(1): 4239.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf1420
https://doi.orgt/10.1038/s41467-019-12287-2
7. Wang P, Zhang YH, Lü JH, et al., 2015, Functional
characteristics of additional positive feedback in genetic 19. Soyer OS, Salathé M, Bonhoeffer S, 2006, Signal transduction
circuits. Nonlinear Dyn, 79(1): 397–408. networks: Topology, response and biochemical processes.
J Theor Biol, 238(2): 416–425.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-014-1673-x
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.05.030
8. Rolland T, Taşan M, Charloteaux B, et al., 2014, A proteome-
scale map of the human interactome network. Cell, 20. Ikeda F, Lahav G, 2013, Signal transduction and signaling
159(5): 1212–1226. networks. Mol Biol Cell, 24(6): 676.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.050 https://doi/.org/10.1091/mbc.E12-12-0877
9. Huttlin EL, Ting L, Bruckner RJ, et al., 2015, The BioPlex 21. Papin JA, Hunter T, Palsson BO, et al., 2005, Reconstruction
network: A systematic exploration of the human interactome. of cellular signalling networks and analysis of their
Cell, 162(2): 425–440. properties. Nat Rev Mol Cell Bio, 6(2): 99–111.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.06.043 https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm1570
Volume 1 Issue 2 (2022) 10 https://doi.org/10.36922/gpd.v1i2.101

