Page 137 - GPD-4-2
P. 137

Gene & Protein in Disease                                         Binding of 11q to DENV and WNV proteases



            (Table 1), indicating a strong and energetically favorable   These results are in agreement with earlier biochemical
            binding affinity. Per residue decomposition of binding free   studies, where 11q was found to be safe for humans. 33
            energy suggests that T132, followed by Y161, substantially
            contributes to the binding free energy (Figure 6B).  4. Conclusion
              If we compare the docking scores and binding free   The NS2B–NS3 proteases of DENV and WNV are
            energies of different complexes studied herein (Table 1),   important targets for antiviral drug discovery. The present
            it is evident that 11q binds more favorably to the DENV   study highlights that 11q can bind to the substrate active
            protease  than  the  WNV  protease.  The  binding  affinity   site of the NS2B–NS3 proteases of the DENV and WNV
            of DENV–11q protease is similar to that of ZIKV–11q   firmly, with binding free energies ranging between ~−13.13
            protease complex (Table 1). This implies that 11q would   ± 2.56 kcal/mol and −15.80 ± 3.34 kcal/mol. The binding
            bind to DENV protease as strongly as the ZIKV protease,   of 11q was found to be mainly stabilized by stacking
            which in turn will be more stable than the known protease   interactions  involving  Y161  and  H51  and  hydrogen
            inhibitor SYC–1307.  In an earlier study,  an antiviral   bonding  interactions  involving  S135,  G133, and  T132.
                             34
                                               22
            drug,  ritonavir, was  shown to bind to  the proteases  of   Notably, despite identical structures and sequences of the
            DENV and WNV with binding free energies of −11.51   active site of the DENV and WNV proteases, their protein
            ± 2.82 kcal/mol and −7.43 ± 2.16 kcal/mol, respectively.   dynamics were distinct. Because of this, 11q adopted
            Similarly, another antiviral drug, paritaprevir, was shown   different conformations in the DENV and WNV protease
            to bind to DENV and WNV proteases with binding free   active sites. Remarkably, the binding affinity of 11q was
            energies of −12.76 ± 2.91 kcal/mol and −17.3 ± 2.55   found to be identical for ZIKV and DENV proteases, which
            kcal/mol, respectively.  These results indicate that 11q   is significantly higher than that of SYC–1307. The binding
                              22
            would form complexes with DENV protease that are about   affinity of 11q bound to WNV was also higher than that of
            4 kcal/mol more stable than those formed with ritonavir,   SYC–1307 bound to the ZIKV protease. Due to its higher
            and about 3 kcal/mol more stable than with paritaprevir   binding affinity and excellent bioavailability, 11q is likely
            (Table 1). Similarly, 11q binds to the WNV protease with   to act as a pan-antiviral against DENV, WNV, and ZIKV
            a binding free energy approximately 6 kcal/mol more   infections. However, biochemical evaluations of protease
                                                               activities in the presence of 11q are necessary to gain more
            favorable than ritonavir, but about 4 kcal/mol less favorable   insights into its inhibitory potential.
            than paritaprevir (Table 1). Therefore, 11q would serve as
            a better inhibitor of DENV protease than ritonavir and   Acknowledgments
                      22
            paritaprevir.  However, although 11q would be a more
            efficient inhibitor of WNV protease than ritonavir, it would   None.
            be less effective than paritaprevir. 22            Funding
              In an earlier study, the drug-likeness of 11q was
            assessed by calculating all parameters defined by   Nihar Ranjan Jena is thankful to the Council of Scientific
            Lipinski’s Rule of 5.  It was found that the computed   and Industrial Research (CSIR, New Delhi) and the Science
                             34
                                                               and Engineering Research Board (SERB, New Delhi) for
            molecular weight, lipophilicity (measured by logP), and   the financial support (Grant No. for CSIR: 01/3061/21/
            the number of hydrogen bond donors and acceptors of   EMR-II and Grant No. for SERB: EMR/2016/005110).
                                             34
            11q did not violate Lipinski’s Rule of 5.  Similarly, the
            pharmacokinetic properties of 11q were computed using   Conflict of interest
            absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion
            properties. Notably,  the gastrointestinal absorption,   The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
            blood–brain barrier permeability, potential interactions   Author contributions
            with key cytochrome P450 enzymes, and activity of efflux
            transporters are factors in predicting drug metabolism   Conceptualization: Nihar Ranjan Jena
            and safety. It was found that 11q exhibits favorable   Investigation: Ramprakash Yadav
            gastrointestinal absorption, limited blood–brain barrier   Methodology: Nihar Ranjan Jena
            penetration, no central nervous system-related side effects,   Supervision: Nihar Ranjan Jena
            and no significant inhibitory interaction with major   Writing – original draft: All authors
            cytochrome P450 isoforms.  The combined absorption,   Writing – review & editing: All authors
                                  34
            distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity profile
            indicates that 11q may act as a promising and safe   Ethics approval and consent to participate
            therapeutic candidate against DENV and WNV infections.   Not applicable.


            Volume 4 Issue 2 (2025)                         8                               doi: 10.36922/gpd.8293
   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142