Page 60 - GTM-2-1
P. 60

Global Translational Medicine                                                ABE gene therapy for CVDs




            Table 2. Representative methods to determine genomic off‑target effects
            Classification   Name         Advantage                   Disadvantage
            Computational    Cas-OFFinder [67]  Simple, cheap and expedient  Biased toward sgRNA- dependent off-target sites. Still
            prediction       CasOT [68]                               require further experimental validation.
                             DeepCRISPR [69]
                             Elevation [70]
            In vitro detection on   Digenome-seq [73]  Unbiased and sensitive  Only applicable in vitro. With false positive and false
            purified genomic DNA  CIRCLE-seq [74]                     negative hits due to the lack of intracellular factors.
                             SITE-seq [72]
                             EndoV-seq [71]  Specifically designed for ABE
            Label and capture in cell  IDLV capture [76]  Unbiased, sensitive and in living cells  Only applicable in cell culture. With false positive and false
            culture          GUIDE-seq [75]                           negative hits due to the lack of physiological relevance.
            Direct detection in   WGS [77]  Unbiased and suitable for clinical samples Expensive and relatively low sensitivity
            animal tissues   DISCOVER-seq [78]  Unbiased and suitable for clinical samples Relatively low sensitivity
                             GUIDE-tag [79]  Unbiased and in animal tissues  Technically complicated and not suitable for clinical samples
            Digenome-seq: In vitro Cas9-digested whole-genome sequencing, CIRCLE-seq: Circularization for reporting of cleavage effects by sequencing,
            SITE-seq: Selective enrichment and identification of adapter-tagged DNA ends by sequencing, IDLV: Integrase-deficient lentivirus,
            GUIDE-seq: Genome-wide, unbiased identification of DSBs enabled by sequencing, WGS: Whole genome sequencing. DISCOVER-seq: Discovery of
            in situ Cas off-targets and verification by sequencing

            and accurate enough to evaluate ABE-induced off-target   editing tools such as ABE, therapeutic genome editing in
            effects in gene therapy remain to be determined.   human bodies has entered clinical trials and will likely become
              So far, two major approaches have been applied to reduce   a reality in near future. In this review, we showcase the power
            the off-target effects by ABE. The first method harnesses   of ABE in CVD therapy and recommend more cardiovascular
            protein structure information or directed evolution   researchers to embrace ABE as a new weapon to tackle CVDs.
            technology to engineer more accurate ABE mutants. For   Acknowledgments
            example, arginine 153 (R153) within TadA was reported
            to mediate its RNA editing activity; thus, R153 deletion   None.
            was implemented in ABEs to minimize its RNA off-target
            effects . Importantly, the recently established ABE9 also   Funding
                 [81]
            drastically reduced both RNA off-target effects and Cas9-  This work was funded by the National Key R&D Program
            independent DNA off-target effects, in addition to the   of China (2022YFA1104800), the National Natural
            aforementioned impact on bystander effects .       Science  Foundation  of  China  (82222006,  32100660,
                                               [59]
              Another plausible method to reduce the off-target effect   82170367, 82100349 and 82200405), Beijing Nova
            works by controlling the duration of ABE expression.   Program (Z211100002121003 and 20220484205), and the
            Because RNA exhibits a high turnover rate, RNA off-  Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China (2021M692253).
            target effects will gradually taper off once the ABE stops   Conflict of interest
            expressing. Similarly, once the on-target DNA editing
            is accomplished, ABE activities should be terminated   No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
            to avoid further accumulation of off-target edits in the
            genome. Based on this rationale, LNP vectors are more   Author contributions
            suitable than AAV vectors in delivering ABEs to the liver,   Conceptualization: Zihao Tao, Yuxuan Guo, Fei Gao
            as LNP-mediated ABE expression only persists for days,   Writing – original draft: Luzi Yang, Zihao Tao, Xiaoteng
            while AAV-mediated gene expression can last for years.  Ma, Xuanhui Zhang, Yuxuan Guo
                                                               Writing – review & editing: Luzi Yang, Zihao Tao, Xiaoteng
            5. Conclusions                                        Ma, Yuxuan Guo, Fei Gao
            CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing has revolutionized
            biomedical research, including cardiovascular research, in the   Ethics approval and consent to participate
            past decade. With the emergence of more advanced genome   Not applicable.


            Volume 2 Issue 1 (2023)                         9                         https://doi.org/10.36922/gtm.232
   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65