Page 85 - GTM-2-1
P. 85

Global Translational Medicine                          Telomere length, mtDNA copy number and colorectal cancer



            ratios (ORs) of CRC per 1 decile decrease in LTL and   ORs of CRC risk per 1 decile decrease in adjusted LTL and
            mtDNA-CN as continuous variables. Incident CRC case   mtDNA-CN as continuous variables.
            status was the dependent variable. Model 1 was adjusted
            for baseline age and sex; Model 2 included additional   3. Results
            adjustments for smoking, BMI, systolic blood pressure   3.1. Basic phenotype characteristics of studied
            (SBP), and TC; Model 3 was additionally controlled by the   groups
            level of education.
                                                               Table  1  presents the basic characteristics of the studied
              Third, we conducted several sensitivity analyses. Analysis   case and control.
            stratified by sex was repeated based on the same models, and
            we conducted analyses separately for CRC at different sites   Participants with incident CRC were somewhat older;
            (colon and rectal). To eliminate the potential reverse effect   they had higher SBP, serum glucose level, and waist/hip
            of an early cancer stage on the reduction of biomarkers’   ratio but similar BMI; they were also more likely to have
            values, we excluded cancer cases with onset (i) within the   hypertension and diabetes mellitus type  2; in addition,
            first 2 years from the baseline and (ii) within the first 8 years   their level of education was lower compared with the
            from the baseline (i.e., below the median period value), and   control group; and women with CRC were more likely to
            repeated two variants of logistic regression analysis using   be in menopause.
            the same covariates and models as above.             In a structure of incident CRC, the proportion of
              The adjusted LTL and mtDNA-CN values were then   colon cancer was 66%, rectal cancer was 32%, and the
            generated to incorporate the possible non-linear joint   combination of both sites was 2%. The mean (SD; median)
            influence of the covariates and case–control status. This   onset age of cancer as registered was 68.5  (8.01; 69.7);
            was done by adding extra interaction terms between   the period between the time blood was drawn and the
            case–control and every covariate into the linear regression   identification of incident CRC was 7.74 years (4.53; 7.92).
            analyses of LTL or mtDNA-CN (dependent variable);    The mean (SD; median) of baseline LTL and
            for example, case-control status, baseline age, and the   mtDNA-CN was 1.27  (0.48; 1.26) and 1.23  (0.49; 1.12),
            interaction term between case-control and age. This was   respectively. The baseline LTL and mtDNA-CN values
            repeated for every covariate, including baseline age, sex,   were lower among cases compared to controls: 0.61 (0.31)
            smoking, BMI, SBP, TC, education, waist-hip ratio (WHR),   versus 1.39 (0.39), P < 0.001 for LTL; and 0.87 (0.29) versus
            and glucose level. The adjusted LTL and mtDNA-CN values   1.30  (0.49),  P  <  0.001  for  mtDNA-CN  (Figure  1).  Both
            were generated (i.e., adjusted for baseline age and sex;   biomarkers were correlated well between themselves and
            controlled for age, sex, smoking, BMI, SBP, TC, education;   negatively correlated with baseline age. The correlation
            and, additionally adjusted for WHR and glucose level).   coefficient  between  LTL  and  baseline  age  was  −0.211,
            Subsequently, we applied logistic regression to evaluate the   P < 0.001; between mtDNA-CN and age was −0.086,


























            Figure 1. Boxplot of leukocyte telomere length (LTL) and mitochondrial DNA copy number (mtDNA-CN) values in cases of colorectal cancer and control
            groups (cases/controls: n = 146/799 for LTL and n = 146/785 for mtDNA-CN).

            Volume 2 Issue 1 (2023)                         5                      https://doi.org/10.36922/gtm.v2i1.184
   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90