Page 85 - GTM-4-1
P. 85

Global Translational Medicine                                Gelatin-based cell carriers for tooth-germ organoids



            material and structural properties in tooth-germ   of growth factors, immune modulators, or cytokines.  This
                                                                                                        22
            organoids. This property is crucial, as material distribution   dual-functionality carrier holds promise for applications in
            during differentiation directly influences tooth germ   other tissue regeneration contexts as well.
                       38
            development.  Staining intensity was semi-quantitatively
            analyzed using ImageJ software, examining over five   4. Conclusion
            images per sample (>15 images per group) to assess   Tooth organoids hold great promise for supporting tooth
            levels of osteogenic differentiation (Figure 4B). Across all   regeneration, creating a demand for cell carriers that are not
            groups except GelMA HG, cells subjected to osteogenic   only biocompatible and effective but also scalable for clinical
            induction showed significantly stronger staining compared   applications. In this study, we  compared four different
            to those in growth medium (+ versus -). Notably, induced   gelatin-based cell carriers to evaluate their ability to support
            cells on Gel MS (Gel MS+) exhibited stronger staining   the  growth  and  differentiation  of  hDPSCs.  Our  results
            compared to those on GelMA MS or  GelMA MP. The    demonstrate that Gel MS, produced through a reproducible
            higher cell density on Gel MS may contribute to these   and scalable process, most effectively supported cell growth
            observed differences in intensity. In addition, factors such   and osteogenic differentiation of hDPSCs compared to
            as sphere diameter, curvature, and size distribution have   GelMA-based carriers (GelMA MS and GelMA MP). While
            been  shown  to influence the  osteogenic  differentiation   further research is needed to elucidate the mechanisms
            of stem cells.  Substrate stiffness is also known to affect   underlying the differential effects of these carriers, Gel
                       39
            the  osteogenic  differentiation  of  stem  cells,  as  reported   MS has emerged as a strong candidate for tooth organoid
            in several studies. 40-42  The Gel MS, GelMA MP, GelMA   generation. Moving forward, pre-clinical studies using Gel
            MS, and GelMA HG synthesized in this study have not   MS will be crucial to determine its effectiveness in vivo and
            been characterized for mechanical properties such as   its potential to support tooth regeneration in clinical settings.
            stiffness, which may differ due to the various crosslinking
            methods used.  Exploring the role of these features in   Acknowledgments
                        43
            cell differentiation on cell carriers could provide valuable
            insights into their impact on hDPSC differentiation and   The  authors  would  like  to express  their  gratitude to
            their potential as scaffolds.                      Dr. Pamela Yelick and Dr. Weibo Zhang at Tufts University
                                                               for providing hDPSCs. The authors also thank Dr.  Derya
              The mechanisms underlying the differential effects of   Ozhava, Peter Winkler, and Krishi Patel for their technical
            various cell carriers on hDPSCs require further investigation.   assistance. Anisha Jackson acknowledges the support of the
            Once these mechanisms are fully understood, it will be   Aresty Research Center at Rutgers University. All illustrations
            possible to develop cell carriers with optimized features that   in this report were created using Biorender software.
            facilitate tooth-germ organoid formation and harness the
            advantages of multiple attributes. Using a combination of   Funding
            heterogeneous cell carriers to maximize the benefits of diverse   None.
            features could also be a viable approach. Future studies will
            assess contributing factors such as base materials (gelatin   Conflict of interest
            versus GelMA) and particle sizes. In addition, to determine
            whether these in vitro observations are translatable to in vivo   The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
            conditions and whether these organoids can support tooth   Author contributions
            regeneration, pre-clinical studies will be essential.
                                                               Conceptualization: All authors
              Our results suggest that Gel MS not only provides
            superior support for cell growth but also promotes   Methodology: All authors
            osteogenic differentiation in organoid-like aggregates of   Investigation: Anisha Jackson, Yong Mao
                                                               Visualization: All authors
            hDPSCs. Among the four cell carriers tested, Gel MS stands   Writing – original draft: Anisha Jackson, Yong Mao
            out as a promising candidate for dental organoid formation.
            Notably, GelMA MS and GelMA MP showed similar      Writing – review & editing: All authors
            capabilities in supporting cell growth and differentiation.   Ethics approval and consent to participate
            However, given that the production of GelMA MP is simpler,
            more reproducible, and scalable than that of GelMA MS,   Not applicable.
            GelMA MP may serve as a practical alternative. Importantly,
            the photocrosslinking of GelMA MP does not compromise   Consent for publication
            protein integrity, making it suitable for the incorporation   Not applicable.


            Volume 4 Issue 1 (2025)                         77                              doi: 10.36922/gtm.5897
   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90