Page 54 - GTM-4-3
P. 54

Global Translational Medicine                                             Evolution of tunneling techniques




                         A                       B                       C






                         D                       E                       F






                        G                        H                       I








            Figure 9. Multi-surface tunnel preparation for the connective tissue graft wall technique. (A) Lingual recession at mandibular central incisors. The left central
            incisor exhibited 9-mm probing depths at the mesiolingual and direct lingual aspects. (B) Intrasulcular incisions were made with ophthalmic microblades,
            and a lingual subperiosteal tunnel was established to facilitate debridement of the defect, thorough root planing, and positioning of a de-epithelialized
            gingival graft (DGG). (C) The tunnel preparation extended to the interproximal and facial surfaces to permit complete instrumentation of the affected
            root surfaces and coronal advancement of the midline papilla. (D) Appearance of the root surface after debridement. (E) The DGG was harvested from
            the palate, de-epithelialized extraorally, and tailored to the dimensions of the site. (F) A demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) was applied
            through the facial tunnel access against the lingual connective tissue graft wall. The DFDBA helped maintain the midline papilla in a coronal position.
            The DGG and lingual tunnel flap were stabilized using a subpapillary continuous sling suture (7-0 polyglycolic acid). (G) Immediate post-operative
            appearance, facial view. The two mandibular central incisors were splinted, and occlusion was adjusted to avoid excessive force on the affected tooth.
            (H) 3 months following the procedure, all probing depths were ≤3 mm. (I) Facial view of mandibular anterior teeth 3 months following the procedure.

              Evidence supporting tunnel-based ARA procedures is   Despite generally consistent reports that tunneling can
            limited to case reports/series. 14-18  However, positive results   favorably  influence  PROMs,  available  evidence  does
            documented in initial reports suggest that controlled   not imply that tunnel procedures should completely
            clinical studies are warranted. The most common post-  replace more established methods. Thus, students must
            operative complication of GBR is wound dehiscence and   become proficient in using both conventional and tunnel
            membrane  exposure  at  the  incision  line.   It  is  possible   flap designs. However, tunnel-based procedures may
                                              33
            that accomplishing GBR without the need for a horizontal   be more technique-sensitive and thus challenging for
            incision at the alveolar crest may reduce the occurrence of   inexperienced operators. A reasonable approach may be to
            wound dehiscence. Achieving ARA using a subperiosteal   start new residents using conventional flaps and introduce
            tunnel may also simplify closure, reduce the procedure   tunneling after the students have gained additional surgical
            duration, and limit patient morbidity.             experience and confidence.
              Tunnel applications in regenerative periodontal surgery   Multiple tunnel-based procedures have utilized
            represent iterations of prior minimally invasive procedures   specialized surgical instruments. For example, in
            that have been validated through long-term clinical   the modified microsurgical tunnel technique, Zuhr
            investigation. 3,41,42  All these procedures balance two critical   et  al.   utilized special  tunneling  knives  during  tunnel
                                                                   7
            concerns—clot stability and access to the root surface for   preparation. Meanwhile, Chao  and Chao et al.  utilized
                                                                                                      31
                                                                                       11
            addressing the etiology. Additional controlled clinical   a specialized transmucosal papilla elevator to accomplish
            research and comparative analyses are needed to define   the pinhole procedure for root coverage. Both the MiTT
            the relative efficacy of emerging techniques. In principle,   and the MCAT relied upon specifically designed tunneling
            however, the conditions for periodontal regeneration   instruments. 9,13,24  Certainly, it is possible to establish a
            that clinicians must establish intraoperatively have not   tunnel preparation without the benefit of specialized
            changed. 37,38  Tunneling is merely a means of establishing   instrumentation. Nevertheless, such instruments may
            these conditions.                                  augment the operator’s ability to achieve adequate flap
              Integrating tunnel-based techniques into graduate   reflection and release without causing undue trauma to the
            dental education presents a dilemma for educators.   delicate marginal gingiva.


            Volume 4 Issue 3 (2025)                         46                          doi: 10.36922/GTM025220048
   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59