Page 66 - IJAMD-1-1
P. 66

International Journal of AI
            for Material and Design                                               Integrating physics data for DL in DED



               doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2021.117331                 Tschopp  MA, Bian L. Porosity prediction: Supervised-
                                                                  learning of thermal history for direct laser deposition.
            6.   Gan Z, Yu G, He X, Li S. Surface-active element transport
               and its effect on liquid metal flow in laser-assisted additive   J Manuf Syst. 2018;47:69-82.
               manufacturing. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2017;86:206-214.     doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.04.001
               doi: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2017.06.007   17.  Khanzadeh M, Chowdhury S, Tschopp MA, Doude HR,
                                                                  Marufuzzaman M, Bian L. In-situ monitoring of melt pool
            7.   “Grace” Guo W, Tian Q, Guo S, Guo Y. A physics-driven
               deep learning model for process-porosity causal relationship   images for porosity prediction in directed energy deposition
               and porosity prediction with interpretability in laser metal   processes. IISE Trans. 2019;51(5):437-455.
               deposition. CIRP Ann. 2020;69(1):205-208.          doi: 10.1080/24725854.2017.1417656
               doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2020.04.049                 18.  Garcia-Moreno AI. Automatic quantification of porosity
                                                                  using an intelligent classifier.  Int J  Adv Manuf  Technol.
            8.   Wei HL, Mukherjee T, Zhang, et al. Mechanistic models for
               additive manufacturing of metallic components. Prog Mater   2019;105(5-6):1883-1899.
               Sci. 2021;116:100703.                              doi: 10.1007/s00170-019-04067-5
               doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100703              19.  Wang S, Zhu L, Fuh JYH, Zhang H, Yan W. Multi-physics
                                                                  modeling and  Gaussian  process  regression analysis of
            9.   Goh GD, Huang X, Huang S, Thong JLJ, Seah JJ, Yeong WY.
               Data imputation strategies for process optimization of laser   cladding track geometry for direct energy deposition. Opt
               powder bed fusion of Ti6Al4V using machine learning.   Lasers Eng. 2020;127:105950.
               Mater Sci Addit Manuf. 2023;2(1):50.               doi: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2019.105950
               doi: 10.36922/msam.50                           20.  Seifi SH, Tian W, Doude H, Tschopp MA, Bian L. Layer-wise
                                                                  modeling and anomaly detection for laser-based additive
            10.  Wang  C,  Tan  XP,  Tor  SB,  Lim  CS.  Machine  learning  in
               additive manufacturing: State-of-the-art and perspectives.   manufacturing. J Manuf Sci Eng ASME. 2019;141(8):81013.
               Addit Manuf. 2020;36:101538.                       doi: 10.1115/1.4043898
               doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101538                21.  Lu ZL,  Li DC, Lu BH,  Zhang AF, Zhu GX, Pi G. The
                                                                  prediction of the building precision in the laser engineered
            11.  Feenstra DR, Molotnikov A, Birbilis N. Utilisation of   net shaping process using advanced networks.  Opt Lasers
               artificial neural networks to rationalise processing windows
               in directed energy deposition applications.  Mater Des.   Eng. 2010;48(5):519-525.
               2021;198:109342.                                   doi: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2010.01.002
               doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109342               22.  Zhang B, Hong KM, Shin YC. Deep-learning-based porosity
                                                                  monitoring of laser welding process. Manuf Lett, 2020;23:62-66.
            12.  Li J, Sage M, Guan X, Brochu M, Zhao YF. Machine
               learning-enabled competitive grain growth behavior study      doi: 10.1016/j.mfglet.2020.01.001
               in  directed  energy  deposition fabricated Ti6Al4V.  JOM.   23.  Hosseini E, Popovich VA. A review of mechanical properties
               2020;72(1):458-464.
                                                                  of additively manufactured inconel 718.  Addit.  Manuf.
               doi: 10.1007/s11837-019-03917-7                    2019;30:100877.
            13.  Han Y, Griffiths RJ, Yu HZ, Zhu Y. Quantitative microstructure      doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2019.100877
               analysis for solid-state metal additive manufacturing via   24.  Zhang J, Wang P, Gao RX. Deep learning-based tensile
               deep learning. J Mater Res. 2020;35(15):1936-1948.
                                                                  strength prediction in fused deposition modeling. Comput
               doi: 10.1557/jmr.2020.120                          Ind. 2019;107:11-21.
            14.  Gayon-Lombardo  A,  Mosser  L,  Brandon  NP,  Cooper  SJ.      doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2019.01.011
               Pores for thought: Generative adversarial networks for   25.  Zhan Z, Li H. Machine learning based fatigue life prediction
               stochastic reconstruction of 3D multi-phase electrode   with effects of additive manufacturing process parameters
               microstructures with periodic boundaries.  npj Comput   for printed SS 316L. Int J Fatigue. 2021;142:105941.
               Mater. 2020;6(1):82.
                                                                  doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105941
               doi: 10.1038/s41524-020-0340-7
                                                               26.  Wang C, Chandra S, Huang S, Tor SB, Tan X. Unraveling
            15.  Huang S, Kumar P, Lim CWJ, Radhakrishnan J, Ramamurty U.   process-microstructure-property correlations in powder-
               Fracture behavior of PH15-5 stainless steel manufactured via   bed fusion additive manufacturing through information-
               directed energy deposition. Mater Des. 2023;235:112421.
                                                                  rich  surface  features  with deep  learning.  J  Mater Process
               doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2023.112421                  Technol. 2023;311:17804.
            16.  Khanzadeh M, Chowdhury S, Marufuzzaman M,        doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.117804


            Volume 1 Issue 1 (2024)                         60                      https://doi.org/10.36922/ijamd.2355
   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71