Page 29 - IJAMD-2-2
P. 29

International Journal of AI for
            Materials and Design                                                  AI-driven material development for AM


               Predicting the evolution of static yield stress with time of   46.  Belsky A, Hellenbrandt M, Karen VL, Luksch P. New
               blended cement paste through a machine learning approach.   developments in the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database
               Constr Build Mater. 2023;371:130632.               (ICSD): Accessibility in support of materials research and
                                                                  design. Acta Crystallogr B. 2002;58(3):364-369.
               doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130632
                                                                  doi: 10.1107/S0108768102006948
            36.  Khurana D, Koli A, Khatter K, Singh S. Natural language
               processing: State of the art, current trends and challenges.   47.  Choudhary K, Garrity KF, Reid ACE,  et al. The joint
               Multimed Tools Appl. 2023;82(3):3713-3744.         automated repository for various integrated simulations
                                                                  (JARVIS) for data-driven materials design.  NPJ Comput
               doi: 10.1007/s11042-022-13428-4
                                                                  Mater. 2020;6(1):173.
            37.  Gu GX, Chen CT, Richmond DJ, Buehler MJ. Bioinspired
               hierarchical composite design using machine learning:      doi: 10.1038/s41524-020-00440-1
               Simulation, additive manufacturing, and experiment. Mater   48.  Talirz L, Kumbhar S, Passaro E,  et  al. Materials cloud,
               Horiz. 2018;5(5):939-945.                          a platform for open computational science.  Sci  Data.
                                                                  2020;7(1):299.
               doi: 10.1039/C8MH00653A
                                                                  doi: 10.1038/s41597-020-00637-5
            38.  Li  J,  Yang  Z, Qian G,  Berto  F.  Machine  learning based
               very-high-cycle fatigue life prediction of Ti-6Al-4V   49.  Draxl C, Scheffler M. NOMAD: The FAIR concept for big
               alloy fabricated by selective laser melting.  Int J Fatigue.   data-driven materials science. MRS Bull. 2018;43(9):676-682.
               2022;158:106764.
                                                                  doi: 10.1557/mrs.2018.208
            39.  Shen SC, Buehler MJ. Nature-inspired architected   50.  Tadmor EB, Elliott RS, Sethna JP, Miller RE, Becker CA. The
               materials using unsupervised deep learning. Commun Eng.   potential of atomistic simulations and the knowledgebase of
               2022;1(1):37.
                                                                  interatomic models. JOM. 2011;63(7):17.
            40.  Lee SY, Byeon S, Kim HS, Jin H, Lee S. Deep learning-based      doi: 10.1007/s11837-011-0102-6
               phase prediction of high-entropy alloys: Optimization,
               generation, and explanation. Mater Des. 2021;197:109260.  51.  Jain A, Ong SP, Hautier G, et al. Commentary: The materials
                                                                  project: A  materials genome approach to accelerating
               doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109260
                                                                  materials innovation. APL Mater. 2013;1(1):011002.
            41.  Buehler MJ. MechGPT, a language-based strategy for      doi: 10.1063/1.4812323
               mechanics and materials modeling that connects knowledge
               across scales, disciplines, and modalities.  Appl Mech Rev.   52.  Saal  JE,  Kirklin  S,  Aykol  M,  Meredig  B,  Wolverton  C.
               2024;76(2):021001.                                 Materials design and discovery with high-throughput
                                                                  density  functional theory: The  open quantum materials
               doi: 10.1115/1.4063843
                                                                  database (OQMD). JOM. 2013;65(11):1501-1509.
            42.  Nazar S, Yang J, Faisal Javed M, Khan K, Li L, Liu QF. An      doi: 10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4
               evolutionary  machine  learning-based  model  to  estimate
               the rheological parameters of fresh concrete.  Structures.   53.  Lakshminarayan K, Harp SA, Goldman R, Samad T.
               2023;48:1670-1683.                                 Imputation of  Missing  Data Using Machine learning
                                                                  Techniques. In:  Simoudis E, Han J, Fayyad UM, editors.
               doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2023.01.019
                                                                              nd
                                                                  Proceedings - 2   International Conference on Knowledge
            43.  Hu  M,  Tan  Q,  Knibbe  R,  et al.  Recent  applications  of   Discovery and Data Mining, KDD 1996. AAAI Press; 1996.
               machine learning in alloy design: A review. Mater Sci Eng R   p. 140-5.
               Rep. 2023;155:100746.
                                                               54.  Mahato V, Chatterjee S, Nyabadza A, Caputo A, Brabazon D.
               doi: 10.1016/j.mser.2023.100746                    Layer porosity in powder-bed fusion prediction using
                                                                  regression  machine  learning  models  and  time-series
            44.  Curtarolo S, Setyawan W, Wang S,  et al. AFLOWLIB.
               ORG: A  distributed materials properties repository from   features. Int J AI Mater Des. 2024;1(3):33-49.
               high-throughput ab initio calculations. Comput Mater Sci.      doi: 10.36922/ijamd.4812
               2012;58:227-235.
                                                               55.  Montazeri M, Nassar AR, Dunbar AJ, Rao P. In-process
               doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.02.002               monitoring of porosity in additive manufacturing using
                                                                  optical emission spectroscopy. IISE Trans. 2020;52(5):500-515.
            45.  Gražulis S, Daškevič A, Merkys A,  et al. Crystallography
               open database (COD): An open-access collection of crystal      doi: 10.1080/24725854.2019.1659525
               structures and platform for world-wide collaboration.   56.  Wasmer  K, Le-Quang  T, Meylan B, Shevchik S. A.  In
               Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(D1):D420-D427.
                                                                  situ quality monitoring in AM using acoustic emission:
               doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr900                            A reinforcement learning approach. J Mater Eng Perform.


            Volume 2 Issue 2 (2025)                         23                        doi: 10.36922/IJAMD025100007
   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34