Page 32 - IJAMD-2-2

International Journal of AI for
Materials and Design AI-driven material development for AM

99. Khan ZN, Albalawi HI, Valle-Pérez AU, et al. From 3D doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ad716e
printed molds to bioprinted scaffolds: A hybrid material 107. Qiao Q, Zhang X, Yan Z, et al. The use of machine learning
extrusion and vat polymerization bioprinting approach for to predict the effects of cryoprotective agents on the GelMA-
soft matter constructs. Mater Sci Addit Manuf. 2022;1(1):7. based bioinks used in extrusion cryobioprinting. Bio-Des
doi: 10.18063/msam.v1i1.7 Manuf. 2023;6(4):464-477.
100. Magennis EP, Hook AL, Davies MC, Alexander C, doi: 10.1007/s42242-023-00244-4
Williams P, Alexander MR. Engineering serendipity: High- 108. Ruberu K, Senadeera M, Rana S, et al. Coupling machine
throughput discovery of materials that resist bacterial learning with 3D bioprinting to fast track optimisation of
attachment. Acta Biomater. 2016;34:84-92. extrusion printing. Appl Mater Today. 2021;22:100914.
doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.11.008 doi: 10.1016/j.apmt.2020.100914
101. Groll J, Burdick JA, Cho DW, et al. A definition of bioinks 109. Hashemi A, Ezati M, Zumberg I, et al. Characterization
and their distinction from biomaterial inks. Biofabrication. and optimization of a biomaterial ink aided by machine
2018;11(1):013001. learning-assisted parameter suggestion. Mater Today
Commun. 2024;40:109777.
doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/aaec52
doi: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.109777
102. Chimene D, Lennox KK, Kaunas RR, Gaharwar AK.
Advanced bioinks for 3D printing: A materials science 110. Huang X, Ng WL, Yeong WY. Predicting the number
perspective. Ann Biomed Eng. 2016;44(6):2090-2102. of printed cells during inkjet-based bioprinting process
based on droplet velocity profile using machine learning
doi: 10.1007/s10439-016-1638-y
approaches. J Intell Manuf. 2024;35(5):2349-2364.
103. Zhang Z, Jin Y, Yin J, et al. Evaluation of bioink printability for doi: 10.1007/s10845-023-02167-4
bioprinting applications. Appl Phys Rev. 2018;5(4):041304.
111. Huang X, Wong YX, Goh GL, Gao X, Lee JM, Yeong WY.
doi: 10.1063/1.5053979 Machine learning-driven prediction of gel fraction in
104. Qavi I, Halder S, Tan G. Optimization of printability of conductive gelatin methacryloyl hydrogels. Int J AI Mater
bioinks with multi-response optimization (MRO) and Des. 2024;1(2):61-75.
artificial neural networks (ANN). Prog Addit Manuf. 2024. doi: 10.36922/ijamd.3807
doi: 10.1007/s40964-024-00828-1 112. Bonatti AF, Vozzi G, Chua CK, Maria CD. A deep learning
105. Lee J, Oh SJ, An SH, Kim WD, Kim SH. Machine quality control loop of the extrusion-based bioprinting
learning-based design strategy for 3D printable bioink: process. Int J Bioprinting. 2022;8(4):620.
Elastic modulus and yield stress determine printability. doi: 10.18063/ijb.v8i4.620
Biofabrication. 2020;12(3):035018.
113. Chen B, Dong J, Ruelas M, et al. Artificial intelligence-
doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ab8707 assisted high-throughput screening of printing conditions
106. Xu Y, Sarah R, Habib A, Liu Y, Khoda B. Constraint based of hydrogel architectures for accelerated diabetic wound
Bayesian optimization of bioink precursor: A machine healing. Adv Funct Mater. 2022;32(38):2201843.
learning framework. Biofabrication. 2024;16(4):045031. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202201843

Volume 2 Issue 2 (2025) 26 doi: 10.36922/IJAMD025100007