Page 31 - IJAMD-2-2

International Journal of AI for
Materials and Design AI-driven material development for AM

doi: 10.1038/s41524-020-0308-7 doi: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.106147
78. Liu S, Kappes BB, Amin-Ahmadi B, Benafan O, Zhang X, 88. Butt J, Mohaghegh V. Combining digital twin and machine
Stebner AP. Physics-informed machine learning for learning for the fused filament fabrication process. Metals.
composition-process-property design: Shape memory alloy 2022;13(1):24.
demonstration. Appl Mater Today. 2021;22:100898.
doi: 10.3390/met13010024
doi: 10.1016/j.apmt.2020.100898
89. Zhang J, Wang P, Gao RX. Deep learning-based tensile
79. Li Z, Pradeep KG, Deng Y, Raabe D, Tasan CC. Metastable strength prediction in fused deposition modeling. Comput
high-entropy dual-phase alloys overcome the strength- Ind. 2019;107:11-21.
ductility trade-off. Nature. 2016;534(7606):227-230. doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2019.01.011
doi: 10.1038/nature17981 90. Lee S, Zhang Z, Gu GX. Generative machine learning
80. Tapia G, Khairallah S, Matthews M, King WE, Elwany A. algorithm for lattice structures with superior mechanical
Gaussian process-based surrogate modeling framework properties. Mater Horiz. 2022;9(3):952-960.
for process planning in laser powder-bed fusion additive doi: 10.1039/D1MH01792F
manufacturing of 316L stainless steel. Int J Adv Manuf
Technol. 2018;94(9-12):3591-3603. 91. He Y, Abdi M, Trindade GF, et al. Exploiting generative
design for 3D printing of bacterial biofilm resistant
doi: 10.1007/s00170-017-1045-z composite devices. Adv Sci. 2021;8(15):2100249.
81. Chen D, Skouras M, Zhu B, Matusik W. Computational doi: 10.1002/advs.202100249
discovery of extremal microstructure families. Sci Adv.
2018;4(1):eaao7005. 92. Goh GD, Sing SL, Lim YF, et al. Machine learning for 3D
printed multi-materials tissue-mimicking anatomical
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aao7005 models. Mater Des. 2021;211:110125.
82. Xue T, Wallin TJ, Menguc Y, Adriaenssens S, Chiaramonte M. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110125
Machine learning generative models for automatic design of
multi-material 3D printed composite solids. Extreme Mech 93. Veerabagu U, Palza H, Quero F. Review: Auxetic polymer-
Lett. 2020;41:100992. based mechanical metamaterials for biomedical applications.
ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2022;8(7):2798-2824.
doi: 10.1016/j.eml.2020.100992
doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c00109
83. Fleisch M, Thalhamer A, Meier G, et al. Functional
mechanical metamaterial with independently tunable 94. Sinha P, Mukhopadhyay T. Programmable multi-physical
stiffness in the three spatial directions. Mater Today Adv. mechanics of mechanical metamaterials. Mater Sci Eng R
2021;11:100155. Rep. 2023;155:100745.
doi: 10.1016/j.mtadv.2021.100155 doi: 10.1016/j.mser.2023.100745
84. Bessa MA, Glowacki P, Houlder M. Bayesian machine 95. Jiao P, Chen T, Xie Y. Self-adaptive mechanical metamaterials
learning in metamaterial design: Fragile becomes (SMM) using shape memory polymers for programmable
supercompressible. Adv Mater. 2019;31(48):1904845. postbuckling under thermal excitations. Compos Struct.
2021;256:113053.
doi: 10.1002/adma.201904845
doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113053
85. Sharma S, Gupta V, Mudgal D, Srivastava V. Predicting
biomechanical properties of additively manufactured 96. Zhang Z, Krushynska AO. Programmable shape-morphing
polydopamine coated poly lactic acid bone plates using deep of rose-shaped mechanical metamaterials. APL Mater.
learning. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 2023;124:106587. 2022;10(8):080701.
doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106587 doi: 10.1063/5.0099323
86. Nasrin T, Pourali M, Pourkamali-Anaraki F, Peterson AM. 97. Chen Y, Wang L. Periodic co-continuous acoustic
Active learning for prediction of tensile properties metamaterials with overlapping locally resonant and Bragg
for material extrusion additive manufacturing. Sci band gaps. Appl Phys Lett. 2014;105(19):191907.
Rep. 2023;13(1):11460. doi: 10.1063/1.4902129
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38527-6 98. Belei C, Pommer R, Amancio-Filho ST. Optimization of
additive manufacturing for the production of short carbon
87. Veeman D, Sudharsan S, Surendhar GJ, Shanmugam R,
Guo L. Machine learning model for predicting the hardness fiber-reinforced polyamide/Ti-6Al-4V hybrid parts. Mater
of additively manufactured acrylonitrile butadiene styrene. Des. 2022;219:110776.
Mater Today Commun. 2023;35:106147. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.110776

Volume 2 Issue 2 (2025) 25 doi: 10.36922/IJAMD025100007