Page 268 - IJB-10-1
P. 268

International Journal of Bioprinting                                    Permeability of NiTi gyroid scaffolds




            Electric, USA). A voxel size of 12.1 μm was achieved during            R 2
                                                                                     0
                                                                      2
                                                                     r
            the analysis indicating the high resolution of the method. The   K   2ln r   1  P       (IV)
                                                                           f
                                                                      f
            reconstruction and segmentation of CT data were performed           4  0  P t
                                                                                      f
            using VG Studio Max (Volume Graphics, USA). Geometry   where u is the velocity of fluid [m/s], K is the permeability
            integrity assessment and pore measurements were done with   coefficient of fluid [mm ],  P is pressure [Pa],  ∇ is del
                                                                                   2
            the built-in algorithms in VG software.            operator, ε is the porosity of a specimen, μ is the dynamic
            2.3. Experimental in-plane permeability            viscosity of the working fluid [Pa.s], Δp =  P  - P  is set
                                                                                                    0
                                                                                                        f
            measurements                                       pressure, r  = R /R , R  is an inlet radius, R  is a front flow
                                                                           f
                                                                                0
                                                                       f
                                                                                                 f
                                                                             0
            To measure the permeability tensor, gyroid samples were   position (matches with circle diameter, obtained from the
            printed in the form of a disk with a diameter of 90 mm, a   experiment for selected time), t is the time of observation.
            height of 3 unit cells, and a hole for an inlet, as shown in   Due to the quasi-isotropy of the porous structure, ellipse
            Figure 1a. NiTi disks were placed into the transparent case   recognition was conducted as circle recognition, with
            to collect the oil from the outlet. For the manufacturing of   the results fitted by Equation IV for isotropic flow front
            the transparent case, digital light processing (DLP) using   propagation.
            Sonic Mini 8K (Phrozen, Taiwan) was employed. White   2.4. Flow characteristics analysis by CFD
            transparent polymer (HARZ Labs, Russia) with 400 nm   Fluid flow modeling was performed to analyze the mass-
            working wavelength was used. Ultraviolet exposure time   transport properties of the gyroid structures. The Navier–
            and layer thickness were set to 1.8 s and 20 μm, respectively.   Strokes equation (Equation V) and conservation of mass
            The prepared sample for the experiment is shown in   equation for incompressible fluid (I) were considered for
            Figure 1b. An in-house-built setup for radial injection   fluid flow simulation as:
            was used for the in-plane permeability measurements,
            as demonstrated in  Figure 1c with main elements        u    u.  u  P   u   f    (V)
                                                                                        2
            designation. Silicone oil (Xiameter PMX-200) with       t
            specified viscosity of 114.6 mPa·s at room temperature of   where ρ is the density of fluid [kg/m ], and f is body force
                                                                                            3
            23°C was used as a working fluid. The pressure difference   [N] (in our case, f=0).
            was created by the pump under the control of a precise
            electronic valve and a pressure gauge. The evolution of the   Water was selected as a working fluid for the
            fluid front during the impregnation of samples by the oil   flow modeling. 17,18  The physical properties of water
                                                                           3
                                                                                         -4
            was recorded by the high-speed cameras. A representative   (ρ = 997 kg/m ; μ = 8.899 × 10  Pa·s at the temperature
            image from  the video  sequence is shown  in  Figure 1d.   of 25°C) were assigned to the fluid domain for analysis.
            The recorded propagation of the fluid front was processed   Mass-transport is characterized in terms of pressure
            with LabView software (Ver. 15.0.1, National Instruments,   distribution,  velocity  distribution  contour  plots,  and
                                                                                                        2
            USA). As a result, an ellipsoidal shape was recognized.   permeability. Permeability is denoted by K [m ] and
            All set-up elements were synchronized using Automated   determined based on Darcy’s law in form (Equation VI).
            Permeability Measurement System (Vitec, Russia) based      mL
                                                                        µ
            on the NI cDAQ-9174 module (National Instruments,     K =− ρ∆                                 (VI)
                                                                        AP
            USA). Three samples  were manufactured  and processed
            by the described protocol for each combination of gyroid   where m˙  is the mass flow rate [kg/s], L is length [m], A is
                                                                                2
            structure parameters (Table 1).                    cross-sectional area [m ], ), and ∆P is pressure difference [Pa].
               According to the conservation of mass equation     Each gyroid model for the fluid flow analysis consisted
            for  incompressible  fluid  (Equation  I),  Darcy’s  equation   of 27 RVEs with 3 RVEs in  x,  y, and  z directions,
            (Equation II), and continuity equation in the polar   respectively. Each of the repeating 9  RVEs in  a gyroid
            coordinate system (Equation III), the permeability   model was designed based on the chosen design parameters
            coefficient can be expressed by Equation IV as follows: 39  of wall thickness and unit cell size; at the next step, the
                                                               fluid domain was obtained by the Boolean subtraction
                  incompressible

               ∇u  0                           (I)    operation of each variation. Next, the 3D models of gyroid
                                                               fluid domains were imported into MATLAB for mesh
                   Kp                                         reconstruction. Afterward, 3D models were transferred
               u                                     (II)
                                                             into ICEM CFD (ANSYS) to add finite volume mesh with
                 isotropic 1  ∂   ∂                          tetrahedral elements. The fluid flow was modeled on thus
                             p
                p          r                         (III)   obtained finite volume mesh to provide the mass-transport
                             r
                      rr    ∂                                 characterization and permeability calculation. Two
                       ∂ 
                ∇
            Volume 10 Issue 1 (2024)                       260                         https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.0119
   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273