Page 279 - IJB-10-1
P. 279

International Journal of Bioprinting                                    Permeability of NiTi gyroid scaffolds




                 of collected cells on the pore size of scaffolding was   Availability of data
                 observed. The found deviation is mainly attributed to
                 the change in the specific surface area, which provides   All reported data are available upon reasonable request to
                 anchorage for the MSCs during cultivation. Therefore,   the corresponding author.
                 at the initial stage of osteointegration, the increased
                 surface area will be a positive factor for cell adherence   References
                 and proliferation to the scaffold.            1.   Mower TM, Long MJ. Mechanical behavior of additive
                                                                  manufactured, powder-bed laser-fused materials. Mater Sci
            Acknowledgments                                       Eng A. 2016;651: 198-213.
            The authors are thankful to the Ostek-CMT Group Ltd.      doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2015.10.068
            (Moscow, Russisa) for the micro-CT analysis as well as   2.   Yuan L, Ding S, Wen C. Additive manufacturing technology
            consultations on the reconstruction and data quality   for  porous  metal  implant  applications  and  triple  minimal
            analysis. The authors also grateful to Pavel A. Ovchinnikov   surface structures: A review. Bioact Mater. 2019;4: 56-70.
            and Stanislav E. Volchkov from the Medical Center of      doi: 10.1016/J.BIOACTMAT.2018.12.003
            Cellular Technologies Dynasty (Samara, Russia).    3.   Qin Y, Wen P, Guo H,  et al. Additive manufacturing of
                                                                  biodegradable metals: Current research status and future
            Funding                                               perspectives. Acta Biomater. 2019;98: 3-22.
                                                                  doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.04.046
            The reported study was funded by Russian Foundation for
            Basic Research (RFBR), project number 20-51-56011.  4.   Yan C, Hao L, Hussein A, Young P. Ti-6Al-4V triply periodic
                                                                  minimal surface structures for bone implants fabricated via
            Conflict of interest                                  selective laser melting. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2015;51:
                                                                  61-73.
            The authors declare no conflict of interest.          doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.06.024

            Author contributions                               5.   Elahinia  MH,  Hashemi  M,  Tabesh  M,  Bhaduri  SB.
                                                                  Manufacturing and processing of NiTi implants: A review.
            Conceptualization: Igor V. Shishkovsky, Sergey G. Abaimov  Prog Mater Sci. 2012;57: 911-946.
            Data curation: Ivan A. Pelevin, Oleg N. Dubinin, Vladimir      doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.11.001
               Yu. Egorov                                      6.   Shishkovsky IV, Volova LT, Kuznetsov MV,  Morozovc
            Investigation: Stanislav V. Chernyshikhin, Biltu Mahato, Aleksei   YG,  Parkin  IP. Porous biocompatible implants and
               V. Shiverskii, Oleg N. Dubinin, Vladimir Yu. Egorov  tissue scaffolds synthesized by selective laser sintering from
            Methodology: Biltu Mahato, Aleksei V. Shiverskii, Ivan A.   Ti and NiTi. J Mater Chem. 2008;18: 1309.
               Pelevin, Oleg N. Dubinin                           doi: 10.1039/b715313a
            Visualization: Stanislav V. Chernyshikhin, Ivan A. Pelevin,   7.   Hameed P, Liu CF, Ummethala R, Singh N. Biomorphic
               Vladimir Yu. Egorov                                porous Ti6Al4V gyroid scaffolds for bone implant
            Writing – original draft: Stanislav V. Chernyshikhin,    applications fabricated by selective laser melting. Prog Addit
               Biltu Mahato, Aleksei V. Shiverskii, Sergey G. Abaimov,   Manuf. 2021;6: 455-469.
               Igor V. Shishkovsky                                doi: 10.1007/s40964-021-00210-5
            Writing – review & editing: Sergey G. Abaimov, Igor V.   8.   Montazerian H, Davoodi E, Asadi-Eydivand M,
               Shishkovsky                                        Kadkhodapour J, Solati-Hashjin M. Porous scaffold
            All authors approved the final manuscript for publication.  internal architecture design based on minimal surfaces: A
                                                                  compromise  between  permeability  and  elastic  properties.
            Ethics approval and consent to participate            Mater Des. 2017;126: 98-114.
                                                                  doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.04.009
            The MSCs used in this study was obtained from the
            Medical Center of Cellular Technologies Dynasty (License   9.   Ma S, Tang Q, Han X, et al. Manufacturability, mechanical
            number: ЛО-63-01-005395). All protocols were conducted   properties, mass-transport properties and biocompatibility
            according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki   of triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) porous scaffolds
                                                                  fabricated by selective laser melting. Mater Des. 2020;195:
            and relevant regulations.                             109034.
                                                                  doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109034
            Consent for publication
                                                               10.  Ali D, Ozalp M, Blanquer SBG, Onel S. Permeability and
            Not applicable.                                       fluid flow-induced wall shear stress in bone scaffolds with



            Volume 10 Issue 1 (2024)                       271                         https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.0119
   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284