Page 335 - IJB-10-1
P. 335

International Journal of Bioprinting                            3D-printed bone scaffolds and biofilm formation




               In  this  study, a  standard  re-entrant  auxetic  (RE)  NPR   Raise3D, Irvine, CA, USA). PLA is produced from renewable
            structure was used due to its ability to be easily constructed   and organic materials such as sugar cane and corn starch.
            into 3D structures with sufficient connectivity between unit   Due to its biodegradability and biocompatibility, PLA has
            cells and to achieve NPR behavior in different principal   shown  its  efficacy  and  excellent  performance  in  diverse
            directions.  According to the literature in tissue engineering,   medical applications of scaffold and stent manufacturing.
                    33
                                                                                                            36
            re-entrant design has essential benefits, such as collagen   Digital CAD models were exported in STL format and
            production,  enhanced neural marker expression,  ability   transferred to IdeaMaker slicing software by Raise3D
                                                    12
                     12
            to sustain cell proliferation,  and capability in emulating   (Raise3D, Irvine, CA, USA). Due to the nature shape of re-
                                  34
            the behavior of native heart tissue.  The RE structure   entrant geometry, the limitations of fabrication process, and
                                          35
            was automatically generated using nTopology software   the need to maintain the unity of the printing parameters
            (nTopology, New York, USA,  https://www.ntop.com/)   for all scaffolds, the scaffolds  were printed  on their side
            through a graph lattice unit cell function. The porosity   (i.e., vertical orientation) without support structures. The
            of TPMS and re-entrant scaffolds was controlled with a   RD scaffolds were printed with a layer height of 0.33 mm,
            thickness parameter “t” that defines each unit cell thickness.   while for other scaffolds’ designs, the layer height was set at
            Table 2 presents the thickness value of each scaffold. The   0.1 mm for better printability. Other printing parameters
            unit cell size was kept at 5 mm due to the fabrication process   were determined according to the manufacturer’s printing
            limitation, which contains four-unit cells each (2 × 2 × 1).
                                                               settings: infill of 100%, printing temperature of 205°C, bed
               Abbreviations: GY, gyroid; RE, re-entrant auxetic; SD,   temperature of 55°C, and printing speed of 60 mm/s. A raft
            Schwarz diamond; SP, Schwarz primitive.            platform addition structure was used in printing all scaffolds.

            2.2. Fabrication process                           2.3. Bacterial biofilm analysis
            Scaffold designs were manufactured using PLA filament
            with a 1.75 mm diameter (obtained from Raise3D; PLA   2.3.1. Crystal violet assay
            Premium;  Raise3D,  Irvine,  CA,  USA)  and  fused  filament   The tissue scaffold samples were immersed in ethanol (70%
            fabrication technique (Raise3D E2 printer; acquired from   v/v) for 1 h, followed by ultrasonic cleaning (Vevor, Rancho

























            Figure 1. Scaffolds geometrical designs. Abbreviations: GY, gyroid; RD, reference design; RE, re-entrant auxetic; SD, Schwarz diamond; SP, Schwarz
            primitive.
            Table 2. Thickness values for each scaffold design
                                             Porosity
             Scaffold design
                                             75% (A)                          45% (B)
             SP                              0.365 mm                         0.8 mm
             GY                              0.647 mm                         1.403 mm
             SD                              0.539 mm                         1.177 mm
             RE                              0.997 mm                         1.639 mm


            Volume 10 Issue 1 (2024)                       327                          https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.1768
   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340