Page 389 - IJB-10-1

International Journal of Bioprinting Design of dual-unit porous scaffold

connection performance, all because of the continuous 4. Park S, Park M, Lee B-T. Autologous stromal vascular
distribution of support parts of G unit and the significantly fraction-loaded hyaluronic acid/gelatin-biphasic calcium
different rod diameter of P and D units. phosphate scaffold for bone tissue regeneration. Mater Sci
Eng C. 2022;132:112533.
The connection performance of different units can doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2021.112533
be optimized by the dual-unit continuous transition 5. Kamal M, Ziyab AH, Bartella A, et al. Volumetric comparison
connection strategy.
of autogenous bone and tissue-engineered bone replacement
materials in alveolar cleft repair: A systematic review
Acknowledgments and meta-analysis. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;56(6):
None. 453–462.
doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2018.05.007
Funding 6. Cui Y-W, Chen L-Y, Chu Y-H, et al. Metastable pitting
corrosion behavior and characteristics of passive film of laser
Not applicable. powder bed fusion produced Ti–6Al–4V in NaCl solutions
with different concentrations. Corros Sci. 2023;215:111017.
Conflict of interest doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2023.111017
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. 7. Wang L, Xie L, Lv Y, et al. Microstructure evolution and
superelastic behavior in Ti-35Nb-2Ta-3Zr alloy processed
Author contributions by friction stir processing. Acta Materialia. 2017;131:499–
510.
Conceptualization: Yuting Lv, Liqiang Wang doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.03.079
Investigation: Jia Liu
Methodology: Binghao Wang, Miao Luo 8. Wang L, Lu W, Qin J, Zhang F, Zhang D. Microstructure and
mechanical properties of cold-rolled TiNbTaZr biomedical
Formal analysis: Zheng Shi, Xing Ouyang β titanium alloy. Mater Sci Eng A. 2008;490:421–426.
Writing – original draft: Yuting Lv doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2008.03.003
Writing – review & editing: Zheng Shi, Hao Dong,
Yanlei Sun 9. Guo L, Ataollah Naghavi S, Wang Z, et al. On the
design evolution of hip implants: A review. Mater Des.
Ethics approval and consent to participate 2022;216:110552.
doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.110552
Not applicable. 10. Barba D, Alabort E, Reed RC. Synthetic bone: Design by
additive manufacturing. Acta Biomater. 2019;97:637–656.
Consent for publication doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.07.049

Not applicable. 11. Zadpoor AA. Meta-biomaterials. Biomater Sci. 2019;8(1):
18–38.
Availability of data doi: 10.1039/C9BM01247H
Not applicable. 12 Xiao R, Feng X, Fan R, et al. 3D printing of titanium-coated
gradient composite lattices for lightweight mandibular
References prosthesis. Composites Part B. 2020;193:108057.
doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108057
1. Moiduddin K, Darwish S, Al-Ahmari A, Elwatidy S, 13. Liu C, Wang C-Y, Liu H, Wang Z-H, Lin GY. Mechanical
Mohammad A, Ameen W. Structural and mechanical properties and biocompatibility of 3D printing Ti6Al4V
characterization of custom design cranial implant created titanium alloy scaffolds. Chin J Nonferrous Met. 2018;28:
using additive manufacturing. Electron J Biotechnol. 758–765.
2017;29:22–31. doi: 10.19476/j.ysxb.1004.0609.2018.04.14
doi: 10.1016/j.ejbt.2017.06.005
14. Song C, Liu L, Deng Z, et al. Research progress on the design
2. Gómez S, Vlad MD, López J, Fernández E. Design and and performance of porous titanium alloy bone implants. J
properties of 3D scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Acta Mater Res Technol. 2023;23:2626–2641.
Biomater. 2016;42:341–350. doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.01.155
doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.06.032
15. Kelly CN, Francovich J, Julmi S, et al. Fatigue behavior of
3. Henkel J, Woodruff MA, Epari DR, et al. Bone regeneration As-built selective laser melted titanium scaffolds with sheet-
based on tissue engineering conceptions — A 21st century based gyroid microarchitecture for bone tissue engineering.
perspective. Bone Res. 2013;1(1):216–248. Acta Biomater. 2019;94:610–626.
doi: 10.4248/BR201303002 doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.046

Volume 10 Issue 1 (2024) 381 https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.1263