Page 298 - IJB-10-2
P. 298

International Journal of Bioprinting                              Kidney hydrogel print for renal cancer model






































            Figure  6. Immunofluorescence staining and semi-quantification. (A) Immunofluorescence images for CD44, vimentin, TWIST, CDH2, and CDH1
            proteins of ACHN cells. (B–F) Semi-quantification analysis of CD44, vimentin, TWIST, CDH2, and CDH1 proteins. (g) Responses of ACHN cells to
            sunitinib in 2D, 10% GelMA, and 10% GelMA-2% Kidney.
            the impact of RCC cellular metastasis at the molecular level.   grades; for this reason, it may be a valuable therapeutic
            These  analyses  involved immunofluorescence  staining   marker  for targeted therapies of  RCC. 45,46  The  10%
            and RT-qPCR of key EMT-related markers, including   GelMA-2% Kidney sample also showed higher MMP2 and
            Slug, Snail, MMP2, MMP9, CD44, ZEB1, TWIST, CDH2,   MMP9 gene expression compared with other groups, a fact
            CDH1, and vimentin.  EMT is one of  the most crucial   that is consistent with the finding that the overexpression
            steps in the RCC metastatic process, where the renal   of Snail family can promote matrix metallopeptidase
            epithelial cells acquire the phenotypical characteristics of   (MMP) expression in RCC.  MMPs play important
                                                                                       43
            mesenchymal cells and show enhanced cellular migration,   roles in tumorigenesis and cancer cell progression since
            invasion, plasticity, and chemoresistance.  RCC originates   they degrade the main components of the ECM and
                                            40
            from the epithelial cells of the kidney, and the EMT process   facilitate RCC cellular metastasis. 47,48  The gene and protein
            can promote the migration and metastasis of RCC cells. 41,42    expression of other EMT-related markers, including CD44,
            Our findings showed that the expression of Snail and Slug   vimentin, and ZEB1, was also upregulated in ACHN cells
            gene was increased in ACHN cells assigned to the 10%   exposed to the 10% GelMA-2% Kidney solution; each
            GelMA-2% Kidney treatment compared to other groups.   of these has also been significantly correlated with RCC
            The Snail family transcription factors have been recognized   metastasis, survival, and recurrence. 49-53  The cadherin
            as important mediators of EMT since they regulate the   switch refers to the upregulation of  CDH2 expression
            expression of several other EMT-related markers, including   and the downregulation of CDH1 expression, which was
            CDH1, MMPs, and vimentin.  Higher  Snail expression   observed for ACHN cells cultured in 10% GelMA-2%
                                     43
            has been found to be correlated with worse disease-free   Kidney via immunofluorescence staining and has been
            and disease-specific survival of RCC patients  and may   found to associate with metastasis and poor prognosis. 54,55
                                                 43
            also be an independent adverse prognostic biomarker   Given that culturing in 10% GelMA-2% Kidney
            for the recurrence and survival of patients with localized   significantly promoted ACHN metastasis, it was then used
            clear cell RCC after nephrectomy.  We also found that   in the experiments for the 3D bioprinting of nephron.
                                        44
            ACHN cells had higher TWIST expression when cultured
            with the 10% GelMA-2% Kidney sample. TWIST is a key   The RNAseq was performed for ACHN cells cultured
            transcription factor that confers tumor cells with CSC-like   with 10% GelMA-2% Kidney as well as a 10% GelMA
            characteristics and is also associated with higher tumor   control culture. These results showed that  RUNX1-


            Volume 10 Issue 2 (2024)                       290                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.1413
   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303