Page 403 - IJB-10-2
P. 403

International Journal of Bioprinting                              Automated bioink mixer improves bioprinting




            Writing – original draft: Jens Kurreck, Dongwei Wu,   based on entangled hydrogel microstrands.  Adv  Sci.
               Shumin Pang                                        2016;7(18):2001419.
            Writing – review & editing:  Jens Kurreck, Dongwei Wu,      doi: 10.1002/advs.202001419
               Shumin Pang, Viola Röhrs, Johanna Berg, Ahmed S.   9.   Karvinen J, Kellomäki M. Design aspects and characterization
               M. Ali, Yikun Mei, Mathias Ziersch, Beatrice Tolksdorf   of hydrogel-based bioinks for extrusion-based bioprinting.
                                                                  Bioprinting. 2023;32:e00274.
            Ethics approval and consent to participate            doi: 10.1016/j.bprint.2023.e00274

            Not applicable.                                    10.  Vu M, Pramanik A, Basak AK, Prakash C, Shankar
                                                                  S. Progress and challenges on extrusion based three
            Consent for publication                               dimensional (3D) printing of biomaterials. Bioprinting. 2022;
                                                                  27:e00223.
            Not applicable.                                       doi: 10.1016/j.bprint.2022.e00223
                                                               11.  Jia R, Zhang M, Yang T, Ma M, Sun Q, Li M. Evolution of
            Availability of data                                  the  morphological,  structural,  and  molecular  properties
            Data  are  available  from  the  corresponding  author  upon   of gluten protein in dough with different hydration levels
            reasonable request.                                   during mixing. Food Chem: X. 2022;15:100448.
                                                                  doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2022.100448
            References                                         12.  Thayer PS, Orrhult LS, Martínez H. Bioprinting of
                                                                  cartilage and skin tissue analogs utilizing a novel passive
            1.   Assad H, Assad A, Kumar A. Recent developments in 3D   mixing unit technique for bioink precellularization. JoVE.
               bio-printing and its biomedical applications. Pharmaceutics.   2018;131(131):e56372.
               2023;15(1):255.                                    doi: 10.3791/56372
               doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15010255
                                                               13.  Li G, Huang K, Deng J, et al. Highly conducting and
            2.   Hagenbuchner J, Nothdurfter D, Ausserlechner MJ. 3D   stretchable double-network hydrogel for soft bioelectronics.
               bioprinting: novel approaches for engineering complex   Adv Mater. 2022;34(15):2200261.
               human tissue equivalents and drug testing. Essays Biochem.      doi: 10.1002/adma.202200261
               2021;65(3):417-427.                             14.  Raja N, Park H, Gal CW, Sung A, Choi Y-J, Yun H-s.
               doi: 10.1042/ebc20200153
                                                                  Support-less  ceramic  3D  printing  of  bioceramic
            3.   Berg J, Kurreck J. Clean bioprinting - fabrication of 3D   structures using a hydrogel bath.  Biofabrication. 2023;
               organ models devoid of animal components.  ALTEX.   15(3):035006.
               2021;38(2):269-288.                                doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/acc903
               doi: 10.14573/altex.2009151                     15.  Zheng Z, Wu J, Liu M, et al. 3D bioprinting of self-standing
            4.   Bhattacharyya A, Janarthanan G, Tran HN, Ham HJ, Yoon   silk-based bioink. Adv Healthc Mater. 2018;7(6):1701026.
               J, Noh I. Bioink homogeneity control during 3D bioprinting      doi: 10.1002/adhm.201701026
               of multicomponent micro/nanocomposite hydrogel for even   16.  Guagliano G, Volpini C, Sardelli L, et al. Hep3Gel: a shape-
               tissue regeneration using novel twin screw extrusion system.   shifting extracellular matrix- based, three-dimensional liver
               Chem Eng J. 2021;415:128971.                       model adaptable to different culture systems. ACS Biomater
               doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.128971                     Sci Eng. 2023;9(1):211-229.
            5.   Wang Y, Yuan X, Yao B, Zhu S, Zhu P, Huang S. Tailoring      doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c01226
               bioinks of extrusion-based bioprinting for cutaneous wound   17.  Dou Z, Tang H, Chen K, et al. Highly elastic and self-healing
               healing. Bioact. Mater. 2022;17:178-194.           nanostructured gelatin/clay colloidal gels with osteogenic
               doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.01.024               capacity for minimally invasive and customized bone
            6.   Ainsworth MJ, Chirico N, de Ruijter M, et al. Convergence   regeneration. Biofabrication. 2023;15(2):025001.
               of melt electrowriting and extrusion-based bioprinting for      doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/acab36
               vascular patterning of a myocardial construct. Biofabrication.   18.  Berg  J,  Hiller  T,  Kissner  MS,  et  al.  Optimization  of  cell-
               2023;15(3):035025.                                 laden bioinks for 3D bioprinting and efficient infection with
               doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ace07f
                                                                  influenza A virus. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):13877.
            7.   Ozbolat IT, Hospodiuk M. Current advances and future      doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-31880-x
               perspectives  in extrusion-based bioprinting.  Biomaterials.   19.  Wu D, Berg J, Arlt B, et al. Bioprinted cancer model
               2016;76:321-343.                                   of neuroblastoma in a  renal microenvironment  as an
               doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.10.076
                                                                  efficiently applicable drug testing platform.  Int J Mol Sci.
            8.   Kessel B, Lee M, Bonato A, Tinguely Y, Tosoratti E, Zenobi-  2022;23(1):122.
               Wong M. 3D bioprinting of macroporous materials      doi: 10.3390/ijms23010122

            Volume 10 Issue 2 (2024)                       395                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.1974
   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408