Page 19 - IJB-3-1

Andy Wen Loong Liew and Yilei Zhang

5. Yeong W Y, Sudarmadji N, Yu H Y, et al. 2010, Porous 17. Krewski D, Acosta Jr D, Andersen M, et al. 2010,
polycaprolactone scaffold for cardiac tissue engineering Toxicity testing in the 21st century: a vision and a
fabricated by selective laser sintering. Acta Biomaterialia, strategy. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health.
vol.6(6): 2028–2034. Part B: Critical Reviews, vol.13(2–4), 51–138.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2009.12.033 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2010.483176
6. Lee P J, Hung P J and Lee L P, 2007, An artificial liver 18. Elliott N T and Yuan F, 2011, A review of three-dimen-
sinusoid with a microfluidic endothelial-like barrier for sional in vitro tissue models for drug discovery and
primary hepatocyte culture. Biotechnology and Bioeng- transport studies. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences,
ineering, vol.97(5): 1340–1346. vol.100: 59–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jps.22257
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bit.21360 19. Naito H, Yoshimura M, Mizuno T, et al. 2013, The
7. Tonsomboon K and Oyen M L, 2013, Composite ele- advantages of three-dimensional culture in a collagen
ctrospun gelatin fiber-alginate gel scaffolds for mechani- hydrogel for stem cell differentiation. Journal of Biome-
cally robust tissue engineered cornea. Journal of the dical Materials Research. Part A, vol.101(10): 2838–2845.
Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, vol.21: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.34578
185–194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.03.001 20. Baker B M and Chen C S., 2012, Deconstructing the third
8. Jungebluth P, Alici E, Baiguera S, et al. 2011, Tracheo- dimension—how 3D culture microenvironments alter
bronchial transplantation with a stem-cell-seeded bioartif- cellular cues. Journal of Cell Science, vol.125(13):
icial nanocomposite: a proof-of-concept study. The 3015–3024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.079509
Lancet, vol.378(9808): 1997–2004. 21. Soucy P A and Romer L H, 2009, Endothelial cell
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61715-7 adhesion, signaling, and morphogenesis in fibroblast-
9. Hasan A, Memic A, Annabi N, et al. 2014, Electrospun derived matrix. Matrix Biology, vol.28(5): 273–283.
scaffolds for tissue engineering of v ascular grafts. Acta http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matbio.2009.04.005
Biomaterialia, vol.10(1): 11–25. 22. Wang R, Xu J, Juliette L, et al. 2005, Three-dimensional
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.08.022 co-culture models to study prostate cancer growth,
10. Atala A, Bauer S B, Soker S, et al. 2006, Tissue- progression, and metastasis to bone. Seminars in Cancer
engineered autologous bladders for patients needing Biology, vol.15(5): 353–364.
cystoplasty. Lancet, vol.367(9518): 1241–1246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2005.05.005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68438-9 23. Burke A S, MacMillan-Crow L A and Hinson J A, 2010,
11. Folkman J and Hochberg M, 1973, Self-regulation of The hepatocyte suspension assay is superior to the
growth in three dimensions. The Journal of Experimental cultured hepatocyte assay for determining mechanisms of
Medicine, vol.138(4): 745–753. acetaminophen hepatotoxicity relevant to in vivo toxicity.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1084/jem.138.4.745 Chemical Research in Toxicology, vol.23(12): 1855–1858.
12. Rouwkema J, Rivron N C and van Blitterswijk C A, 2008, http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/tx1003744
Vascularization in tissue engineering. Trends in Biote- 24. Mingoia R T, Nabb D L, Yang C-H, et al. 2007, Primary
chnology, vol.26(8): 434–441. culture of rat hepatocytes in 96-well plates: effects of
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2008.04.009 extracellular matrix configuration on cytochrome P450
13. Schmeichel K L and Bissell M J, 2010, Modeling enzyme activity and inducibility, and its application in in
tissue-specific signaling and organ function in three vitro cytotoxicity screening. Toxicology in Vitro, vol.21(1):
dimensions. Journal of Cell Science, vol.116(Pt 12): 165–173.
2377–2388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.00503 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2006.10.012
14. Griffith L G and Swartz M A, 2006, Capturing complex 25. Zhang W, Wray L S, Rnjak-Kovacina J, et al. 2015,
3D tissue physiology in vitro. Nature Reviews: Molecular Vascularization of hollow channel-modified porous silk
Cell Biology, vol.7(3): 211–224. scaffolds with endothelial cells for tissue regeneration.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm1858 Biomaterials, vol.56: 68–77.
15. Auger F A, Gibot L and Lacroix D, 2013, The pivotal role http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.03.053
of vascularization in tissue engineering. Annual Review of 26. Mitchell G M and Morrison W A, 2014, In vivo
Biomedical Engineering, vol.15: 177–200. vascularization for large-volume soft tissue-engineering.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071812-152428 Vascularization—Regenerative Medicine and Tissue
16. Baranski J D, Chaturvedi R R, Stevens K R, et al. 2013, Engineering: 343–362.
Geometric control of vascular networks to enhance http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/b16777-23
engineered tissue integration and function. Proceedings 27. Dababneh A B and Ozbolat I T, 2014, Bioprinting
of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States technology: a current state-of-the-art review. Journal of
of America, vol.110(19): 7586–7591. Manufacturing Science and Engineering, vol.136(6):
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1217796110 61016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.4028512
International Journal of Bioprinting (2017)–Volume 3, Issue 1 15